AppelbaumM.CooperH.KlineR. B.Mayo-WilsonE.NezuA. M.RaoS. M. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 3–25.
2.
BagozziR. P. (2011). Measurement and meaning in information systems and organizational research: Methodological and philosophical foundations. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 261–292.
3.
BeckerT. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3), 274–289.
4.
BonoJ. E.McNamaraG. (2011). Publishing in AMJ—Part 2: Research design. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 657–660.
5.
ChangJ. Y. (2017). Mutual monitoring of resources in an enterprise systems program. Project Management Journal, 48(1), 100–115.
6.
DiegmannP.BastenD.PankratzO. (2017). Influence of communication on client satisfaction in information system projects: A quantitative field study. Project Management Journal, 48(1), 81–99.
7.
GeorgeG.HaasM. R.PentlandA. (2014). Big data and management. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 321–326.
8.
GregorS.KleinG. (2014). Eight obstacles to overcome in the theory testing genre. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(11), I–XIX.
9.
LanceC. E. (2011). More statistical and methodological myths and urban legends. Organizational Research Methods, 14(2), 279–286.
10.
MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffP. M.PodsakoffN. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 293–334.
11.
MakadokR.BurtonR.BarneyJ. (2018). A practical guide for making theory contributions in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 39(6), 1530–1545. doi:10.1002/smj.2789
12.
MarcoulidesG. A.ChinW. W. (2013). You write, but others read: Common methodological misunderstandings in PLS and related methods. In AbdiH.ChinW. W.Esposito VinziV.RussolilloG.TrincheraL. (Eds.), New perspectives in partial least squares and related methods (pp. 31–64). New York, NY: Springer.
13.
SaundersM.LewisP.ThornhillA. (2009). Research methods for business students. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.
14.
SemadeniM.WithersM. C.Trevis CertoS. (2014). The perils of endogeneity and instrumental variables in strategy research: Understanding through simulations. Strategic Management Journal, 35(7), 1070–1079.
15.
WilliamsL. J.O’BoyleE. H. (2015). Ideal, nonideal, and no-marker variables: The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) marker technique works when it matters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1579–1602.
16.
ZhangL.ChengJ. (2015). Effect of knowledge leadership on knowledge sharing in engineering project design teams: The role of social capital. Project Management Journal, 46(5), 111–124.