Megaprojects can be perceived as modern symbols, crucial for the encapsulation of ideas, attitudes, and beliefs. This study explores the exegetical meanings, or meanings derived from local interpretation, that a megaproject can encapsulate and how those meanings shape the megaproject's process. A longitudinal study of the Dutch High-Speed Train megaproject was executed. The findings show three exegetical meanings of the megaproject, which were used for strategic goals, leading to power struggles, delays, and cost overrun, and finally resulting in a negative symbol of a failed megaproject. This article contributes to the megaproject literature with an anthropological perspective on symbolism.
ValvasAd (2003). Hansje Brinker has a finger in the soup [Hansje Brinker heeft een vinger in de pap].Vrije Universiteit Magazine, 27 November 2003, p. 7.
2.
AD newspaper (2007). Completion HST has been suspended again [Oplevering HSL Zuid opnieuw uitgesteld]. November 2007, p. 9
3.
AltshulerA., & LuberoffD. (2003). Megaprojects: The changing politics of urban public investiments.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
BarleyS. R. (1990). Images of imaging: Notes on doing longitudinal field work.Organization Science, 1(3), 220–247.
8.
BresnenM., GoussevskaiaA., & SwanJ. (2005). Managing projects as complex social settings.Building Research and Information, 33(6), 487–493.
9.
BrownA. D. (1994). Politics, symbolic action and myth making in pursuit of legitimacy.Organization Studies, 15(6), 861–878.
10.
CicmilS., & GaggiottiaH. (2014). The “slippery” concept of “culture” in projects: Towards alternative theoretical possibilities embedded in project practice.Engineering Project Organization Journal, 4(2), 134–146.
11.
CicmilS., & HodgsonD. (2006). New possibilities of project management theory: A critical engagement.Project Management Journal, 37(3), 111–122.
12.
CleggS. R., & KreinerK. (2013). Power and politics in construction projects. In DrouinN., MullerR., & SankaranS. (Eds.), Novel approaches to organizational project management research; Translational and transformational (pp. 268–293). Copenhagen, Denmark: Liber/ Copenhagen Business School Press.
13.
Commission-Duijvensteijn. (2004). Research on infrastructures [Onderzoek naar Infrastructuurprojecten].The Hague, Netherlands: SDU.
14.
CorvellecH. (2001). Talks on tracks— Debating urban infrastructure projects.Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, 7(2), 25–53.
15.
CzarniawskaB. (1992). Exploring complex organizations: A cultural perspective.London, England: Sage.
16.
DaviesA., & MackenzieI. (2014). Project complexity and systems integration: Constructing the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics Games.International Journal of Project Management, 32(5), 773–790.
17.
DeweyO. F., & DavisD. E. (2013). Planning, politics and urban mega-projects in developmental context: Lessons from Mexico City's airport controversy.Journal of Urban Affairs, 35(5), 531–551.
18.
Diaz OruetaF., & FainsteinS. S. (2008). The new mega-projects: Genesis and impacts.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4), 759–767.
19.
Dutch Auditing Institute. (2014). Highspeed train-south: A report in picture [HSL Zuid: een onderzoek in beeld].The Hague, Netherlands: SDU.
20.
DuursmaM., & VerlaanJ. (2015). From the start it is wrong with the high speed train [Vanaf't begin zit het fout met de hogesnelheidstrein].28th of October, NCR Handelsblad. Amsterdam, 4–5.
21.
FirthR. (1973). Symbols, public and private.London, England: Routledge.
22.
FlormanS. C. (1996). The existential pleasure of engineering.New York, NY: St. Martin's Griffin.
23.
FlyvbjergB. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview.Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19.
24.
FlyvbjergB., BruzeliusN., & RothengatterW. (2003). Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25.
GagliardiP. (1990). Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape.New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
26.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures.London, England: Fontana Press.
GrueningG. (2001). Origin and theoretical basis of New Public Management.International Public Management Journal, 4(1), 1–25.
29.
HarveyP., & KnoxH. (2015). Roads: An anthropology of infrastructure and expertise.London, England: Cornell University Press.
30.
HSL (2009). Highlights, no. 18, 2009.
31.
KendraK., & TaplinT. (2004). Project success: A cultural framework.Project Management Journal, 35(1), 30–45.
32.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data.Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.
33.
LöfgrenO. (2015). Catwalking a bridge. A longitudinal study of a transnational project and its ritual life. In Van MarrewijkA. H. (Ed.), Inside mega-projects: Understanding cultural practices in project management.Copenhagen, Denmark: Liber/ Copenhagen Business School, pp. 33–68.
34.
MalinowskiB. (1939). The group and individual in functional analysis.The American Journal of Sociology, 44(6), 938–954.
35.
NautaR. (1991). Symbolics in organizations [Symboliek in Organisaties]. In Van GrumbkowJ. (Ed.), Culture in organizations [Cultuur in organisaties] (pp. 55–80). Assen, Netherlands: van Gorkum.
36.
NRC Handelsblad (2016). More high-speed trains in 2016; a false promise [Meer hogesnelheidstreinen in 2016: vooral mooie belofte] 20 December 2016, p. E7.
37.
Parliamentary Commission. (2015). Fyraeport. Year 2015–2016.The Hague, Netherlands: Tweede Kamer.
38.
PettigrewA. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice.Organization Science, 1(3), 267–292.
39.
PitsisT. S., CleggS. R., MarosszekyM. (2003). Constructing the Olympic dream: A future perfect strategy of project management.Organization Science, 14(5), 574–590.
40.
RafaeliA., & PrattM. (2006). Artifacts and organizations: Beyond mere symbolism.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41.
SchwartzH. S. (1990). The symbol of the space shuttle and the degeneration of the American dream. In GagliardiP. (Ed.), Symbols and artefacts (pp. 303–321). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
42.
ScrantonP. (2015). Projects as a focus for historical analysis: Surveying the landscape.History and Technology: An International Journal, 30(4), 354–373.
43.
SminiaH. (2011). Institutional continuity and the Dutch construction industry fiddle.Organization Studies, 32(11), 1559–1585.
44.
SmircichL. (1983). Concepts of culture and organization analysis.Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 339–358.
45.
SmitsK., & Van MarrewijkA. H. (2012). Chaperoning: Practices of collaboration in the Panama Canal expansion program.International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(3), 440–456.
46.
SöderlundJ. (2004). Building theories of project management: Past research, questions for the future.International Journal of Project Management, 22(3), 183–191.
47.
SöderlundJ., & LenfleS. (2013). Making project history: Revisiting the past, creating the future.International Journal of Project Management, 31(5), 653–662.
TennekensJ. (1982). Symbols and their meaning: An introduction in the symbolic anthropology [Symbolen en hun boodschap. Een inleiding in de symbolische antropologie]. Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
50.
TurnerV. (1967). The Forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
51.
TurnerV. (1973). Symbols in African ritual.Science, 179(4078), 1100–1105.
52.
Van den EndeL., & Van MarrewijkA. H. (2014). The ritualization of transitions in the project life cycle: A study of transition rituals in construction projects.International Journal of Project Management, 32(7), 1134–1145.
53.
Van den EndeL., Van MarrewijkA. H., & BoersmaK. (2015). Machine baptisms and heroes of the underground: Performing sociomateriality in an Amsterdam metro project.Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 4(3), 260–280.
54.
Van den HeuvelG. (2005). The parliamentary enquiry on fraud in the Dutch construction industry collusion as concept between corruption and state-corporate crime.Crime, Law & Social Change, 44(2), 133–151.
55.
Van MarrewijkA. H. (2007). Managing project culture: The case of Environ Megaproject.International Journal of Project Management, 25(3), 290–299.
56.
Van MarrewijkA. H. (2015). Inside megaprojects: Understanding cultural practices in project management. In CleggS. R. (Ed.), Advances in organization studies (p. 209). Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press.
57.
Van MarrewijkA. H., YbemaS., SmitsK. (2016). Clash of the titans: Temporal organizing and collaborative dynamics in the Panama Canal megaproject.Organization Studies, 37(12), 1745–1769.
58.
VeenswijkM., MarrewijkA. H., & BoersmaK. (2010). Developing new knowledge in collaborative relationships in megaproject alliances: Organizing reflection in the Dutch construction sector.International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 4(2), 216–232.
59.
WorsleyP. (1957). The trumpet shall sound: A study of “cargo” cults in Melanesia.London, England: London: MacGibbon & Kee.
60.
YanowD., & Schwartz-SheaP. (2006). Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretative turn.Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
