AltshulerA., & LuberoffD. (2003). Mega-projects: The changing politics of urban public investment.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
2.
AngK., & KillenC. (2016). Multi-stakeholder perspectives of value in project portfolios. EURAM 2016, Paris, France, June 1–4.
3.
BiesenthalC., CleggS. D., MahalingamA., & SankaranS. (2017). Applying institutional theories to managing megaprojects, International Journal of Project Management. (In Press)
4.
BookK., EskilssonL., & KhanJ. (2010). Governing the balance between sustainability and competitiveness in urban planning: The case of the Orestad model.Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(6), 382–396.
5.
ChiC. S. F., ChenY., & ShiW. (2014). Managing institutional change in international infrastructure projects. Engineering Project Organization Conference, Colorado, USA, July 29–31.
6.
CleggS. R., & KreinerK. (2013). Power and politics in construction projects. In DrouinN., MüllerR., & SankaranS. (Eds.), Novel approaches to organizational project management research: Translational and transformational.Copenhagen, Denmark: CBS Press, 268–293.
7.
CleggS., SankaranS., BiesenthalC., & PollackJ. (2017). Power and sensemaking in megaprojects. In FlyvbjergB. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of megaproject management.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 238–258.
8.
CohenM. D., MarchJ. G., & OlsenJ. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice.Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.
9.
DaviesA., DodgsonM., GannD. M., & MacAulayS. (2017). Five rules for managing large, complex projects.MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(1). (In Press)
10.
DesjardinsJ. (2017). Nine of the world's largest megaprojects that are under construction.Business Insider, January 11, 2017.
11.
DilleT., & SöderlundJ. (2011). Managing inter-institutional projects: The significance of isochronism, timing norms and temporal misfits.International Journal of Project Management, 29(4), 480–490.
12.
EisenstadtS. N. (1995). The order-transforming and order-maintaining dimensions of culture. In EisenstadtS. N., Power, trust, and meaning.Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
13.
FlyvbjergB. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview.Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19.
14.
FlyvbjergB. (2017). Introduction: The iron law of megaproject management. In FlyvbjergB. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of megaproject management.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1–18.
15.
FlyvbjergB., BruzeliusN., & RothengatterW. (2003). Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
GaremoN., MatzingerS., & PalterR. (2015). Megaprojects: The good, the bad, and the better.New York, NY: McKinsey & Company.
18.
GellertP. K., & LynchB. D. (2003). Megaprojects as displacements.International Social Science Journal, 55(175), 15–25.
19.
GeraldiJ., & MorrisP. W. G. (2011). Managing the institutional context for projects.Project Management Journal, 42(6), 20–32.
20.
GeraldiJ., & SöderlundJ. (2018). Project studies: What it is, where it is going.International Journal of Project Management. (In Press)
21.
GrabherG. (2004). Temporary architectures of learning: Knowledge governance in project ecologies.Organization Studies, 25(9), 1491–1514.
22.
GrabherG., & ThielJ. (2014): Coping with a self-induced shock: The heterarchic organization of the London Olympic Games 2012.Social Science, 3, 527–548.
23.
HirschmanA. O. (1967). Development projects observed.Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
24.
HolmP. (1995). The dynamics of institutionalism: Transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries.Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 398–422.
25.
JiaG., YangF., WangG., HongB., & YouR. (2011). A study of megaprojects from a perspective of social conflict theory.International Journal of Project Management, 29, 817–827.
26.
JoslinR., & MüllerR. (2013). A natural sciences comparative to develop new insights for project management research. In DrouinN., MüllerR., & SankaranS. (Eds.), Novel approaches to organizational project management research: Translational and transformational.Copenhagen, Denmark: CBS Press, 320–347.
27.
KusumaI. (2014). The cultural ecosystems of megaprojects: The interconnectedness of organizational elements and their wider institutional contexts.International Journal of Architecture, Engineering and Construction, 3(2) 82–97.
28.
LenfleS., & LochC. (2017). Has megaproject management lost its way? Lessons from history. In FlyvbjergB. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of megaproject management.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 21–38.
29.
LevittR. E., & ScottW. R. (2017). Institutional challenges and solutions for megaprojects. In FlyvbjergB. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of megaproject management.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 96–117.
30.
MahalingamA., & LevittR. E. (2007). Institutional theory as a framework for analyzing conflicts on global projects.Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(7), 517–528.
31.
MarchJ. G., SproullL. S., & TamuzM. (1991). Learning from samples of one or fewer.Organization Science, 12(1), 1–13.
32.
MerrowE.W. (2011). Industrial megaprojects: Concepts, strategies and practices for success.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
33.
MirabileM., MarchalV., & BaronR. (2017). Technical notes on estimates of infrastructure investment needs: Background note to the report.Investing in Climate, Investing in Growth, OECD, Paris, France.
34.
RasagamG., EngmanM., GurcanlarT., & FernandesE. (2014). Mozambique's development corridors: Platforms for shared prosperity. In RossD. C. (Ed.), Mozambique rising: Building a new tomorrow.Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 87–97.
35.
PrencipeA., & TellF. (2001). Inter-project learning: Processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms.Research Policy, 30, 1373–1394.
36.
SankaranS. (2018) Megaproject management and leadership: A narrative analysis of life stories—past and present.International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. (In Press)
37.
ScrantonP. (2014), Projects as a focus for historical analysis: Surveying the landscape.History and Technology, 30(4), 354–373.
38.
SiemiatyckiM. (2017). Cycles in megaproject development. In FlyvbjergB. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of megaproject management.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 39–59.
39.
SimonH. A. (1976). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization.New York, NY: Free Press.
40.
SöderlundJ. (2004). Building theories of project management: Past research, questions for the future.International Journal of Project Management, 22, 183–191.
41.
SöderlundJ. (2011a). Pluralism in project management: Navigating the crossroads of specialization and fragmentation.International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 153–176.
42.
SöderlundJ. (2011b). Theoretical foundations of project management: Suggestions for a pluralistic understanding. In MorrisP., PintoJ., & SöderlundJ. (2011) (Eds.): Oxford Handbook of Project Management.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43.
SöderlundJ., & LenfleS. (2013). Making project history: Revisiting the past, creating the future.International Journal of Project Management, 31, 653–662.
TurnerR., & ZolinR. (2014). Forecasting success on large projects: Developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames.Project Management Journal, 43(5), 87–99.
46.
Van MarrewijkA. (2015). (Ed.) Inside megaprojects: Understanding the cultural practices in project management.Copenhagen, Denmark: CBS Press.
47.
Van MarrewijkA., YbemaS. B., SmitsK. C. M., CleggS. R., & PitsisT. (2016). Clash of the Titans: Temporal organizing and collaborative dynamics in the Panama Canal Megaproject.Organization Studies, 37(12), 1745–1769.
48.
WesthuzienJ. V. (2007). Glitz, glamour and the Gautrain: Megaprojects as political symbols.Politikon, 34(3), 333–351.
49.
ZhaiL., XinY., & ChengC. (2009). Understanding the value of project management from a stakeholder's perspective: Case study of megaproject management.Project Management Journal, 40(1), 99–109.