Project teams carrying out innovation projects are investigated during critical incidents. Earlier, a Team Innovation Resilience Behavior (IRB)-scale was successfully applied to quantitative survey data (Oeij, 2017). Team IRB is the team's capacity to effectively deal with possible incidents and ensure the project's continuation. This study uses qualitative data to validate the Team IRB concept. Methodologically, it is concluded that the concept of Team IRB allows for its application to both qualitative and qualitative data. The content conclusion is that teams that score highly for Team IRB are better in recovering from critical incidents than they are in preventing critical incidents.
AlligerG. M., CerasoliC. P., TannenbaumS.I., & VesseyW.B. (2015). Team resilience: How teams flourish under pressure.Organizational Dynamics, 44(3), 176–184.
2.
CastellionG., & MarkhamS. K. (2013). Perspective: New product failure rates: Influence of argumentum ad populum and self-interest.Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), 976–979.
3.
FlanaganJ. C. (1954). The critical incident technique.Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358.
4.
MulderN. (2016). Value-based project management. How to bring focus into complex projects.Elst, Belgium: Mulder Project Management.
RayJ. L., BakerL. T., & PlowmanD. A. (2011). Organizational mindfulness in business schools.Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10(2), 188–203.
7.
SilvermanD. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook (4th ed., 1st ed. 2000). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
8.
SutcliffeK. M., VogusT. J., & DaneE. (2016). Mindfulness in organizations: A cross-level review.Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 55–81.
9.
VogusT., & IacobucciD. (2016). Creating highly reliable health care: How reliability-enhancing work practices affect patient safety in hospitals.ILR Review, 69(4), 911–938.
10.
VogusT. J., & SutcliffeK. M. (2007). The safety organizing scale: Development and validation of a behavioral measure of safety culture in hospital nursing units.Medical Care, 45(1), 46–54.
11.
VogusT. J., & WelbourneT. M. (2003). Structuring for high reliability: HR practices and mindful processes in reliability-seeking organizations.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(7), 877–903.
12.
WeickK. E., & SutcliffeK. M. (2007). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
WeickK. E., SutcliffeK. M., & ObstfeldD. (1999). Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. In: SuttonR. S., and StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, Volume 1 (pp. 81–123). Stanford, CA: Jai Press.
