Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

As the business environment changes, a key element needed for sustaining corporate success is the ability to respond proactively through operational improvement. Corporations are paying increased attention toward improving their operational management practices (Brown & Eisenhardt, 2000). In the last two decades, Six Sigma methodology has evolved with growing momentum, creating billions of dollars of value innovations in various industries. In this paper, a new framework using the Six Sigma methodology is presented that can help companies to better categorize potential projects in a systematic way. This framework maps potential projects in terms of process capability and controllability as its performance indicators. The applicability of this new framework is illustrated in a case study of operational improvement program management at a Fortune 100 company.

Keywords

project management six sigma operational improvement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brown

, & Eisenhardt

(2000). Competing on the edge: Strategy as a structured chaos. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Breyfogle

F. W.

(2003). Implementing Six Sigma: Smarter solutions using statistical methods. New York: Wiley.

Breyfogle

F. W.

, Cupello

J. M.

, & Meadows

(2001). Managing Six Sigma: A practical guide to understanding, assessing, and implementing the strategy that yields bottom-line success. New York: Wiley.

Choi

T. Y.

(1995). Conceptualizing continuous improvement: Implications for organizational change. Omega, International Journal of Management Science, 23(6), 607–624.

Cooper

R. G.

(1993). Winning at new products. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

Eckes

(2001). Six Sigma revolution: How General Electric and others turned process into profits. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Hamel

(2000). Leading the revolution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Henriksen

A. D.

, & Traynor

A. J.

(2000). A practical R&D project selection scoring tool. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2, 158–170.

Holland

, & Kumar

(1995). Getting past the obstacles to successful reengineering. Business Horizons, 38(3), 79–85.

10.

Hoerl

(2004). One perspective on the future of Six-Sigma. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 1(1), 112–119.

11.

Klastorin

(2004). Project management tools and trade-offs. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

12.

Meredith

, & Mantel

(2003). Project management. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

13.

Meredith

, Shafer

, & Turban

(2002). Quantitative business modeling. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.

14.

Montgomery

(1996). Introduction to statistical quality control. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

15.

Smith

, & Reinertsen

(1998). Developing products in half the time. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.

16.

Walleck

, O'Halloran

, & Leader

(1991). Benchmarking world-class performance. McKinsey Quarterly, 1.

17.

Zammuto

R. F.

, & O'Connor

E. J.

(1992). Gaining advanced manufacturing technologies' benefits: The roles of organization design and culture. Academy of Management Review, 17(4), 701–728.

Project Categorization,Prioritization,and Execution Based on Six Sigma Concept: A Case Study of Operational Improvement Project

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References