This article analyzes deviations in an automation project. The article develops a more holistic view of the project organization, focusing on how deviations are managed. The case study demonstrates that the tools and methods suggested in the literature are rarelyused, and shows the importance of the context of the project in terms of gathering information and sharing knowledge that is required to manage deviations. Furthermore, the case shows that there are a number of deviation-management tactics that are applied to different deviations, dependent on whether they are uncertain and/or ambiguous.
AlsakiniW., WikströmK., & KiirasJ. (2004). Proactive schedule management of industrial turnkey projects in developing countries. International Journal of Project Management, 22(1), 75–85.
2.
BarkleyB. T. (2004). Project risk management.New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
BengtssonM., MüllernT., SöderholmA., & WâhlinN. (in press). A grammar of organizing.London: Edward Elgar.
4.
BrymanA. (2001). Social research methods.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5.
CicmilS. (2005). Reflection, participation and learning in project environments: A multiple perspective agenda. In LoveP., FongP. S. W., & IraniZ. (Eds.), Management of knowledge in project environments (pp. 156–179). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
6.
DvirD., & LechlerT. (2004). Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: The impact of changes on project success. Research Policy, 33(1), 1–15.
7.
De MeyerA., LochC., & PichM.(2002). Managing project uncertainty: From variation to chaos. Sloan Management Review, 43(2), 60–68.
8.
EisenhardtK.M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
9.
EkstedtE., SöderholmA., & WirdeniusH. (1999). Neo-industrial organizing: Renewal by action and knowledge formation in a project-intensive econ-omy.London: Routledge.
10.
EngwallM., & WestlingG. (2004). Peripety in an R&D drama: Capturing a turnaround in project dynamics. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1557–1578.
11.
GherardiS. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7(2), 211–223.
12.
HällgrenM. (2004). (In Swedish) Mellan plan och kaos: En studie av avvikelser i projektintensiva organisationer (Between plan and chaos: A study of deviations in project intensive organ-izations). Licentiate thesis, Department of Business Administration, Umeâ University, Umeâ, Sweden.
13.
HislopD., NewellS., ScarbroughH., & SwanJ. (2000). Networks, knowledge and power: Decision making, politics and the process of innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 12(3), 399–411.
14.
KreinerC. (1995). In search of relevance: Project management in drifting environments. ScandinavianJournal of Management, 11(4), 335–346.
15.
LevittB., & MarchJ. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology.14, 319–340.
16.
LindahlM. (2003). (In Swedish) Produktion till varje pris: Om planering och improvisation i anläggning-sprojekt (Production at any price: About planning and improvisation in construction projects). Doctoral thesis, Department of Industrial Management, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
17.
Maaninen-OlssonE. (2004). (In Swedish) Det gränslösa projektet-en studie om förmedling och skapande av kunskap i tid och rum (The boundary-less project-A study about transfer and creation of knowledge in time and space). Licentiate thesis, Department of Business Administration, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
18.
MarchJ. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
19.
MerriamS. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
20.
NicholasJ.M. (2001). Project management for business and technology. (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
PavlakA. (2004). Project troubleshooting: Tiger teams for reactive risk management. Project Management Journal, 35(4), 5–14.
22.
PenderS. (2001). Managing incomplete knowledge: Why risk management is not sufficient. International Journal of Project Management, 19(2), 79–87.
23.
Project Management Institute. (2004). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (3rd ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Author.
24.
ScarbroughH., SwanJ., LaurentS., BresnenM., EdelmanL., & NewellS. (2004). Project-based learning and the role of learning boundaries. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1579–1600.
25.
TaylorS. J., & BogdanR. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resources.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
26.
YinR. K. (1989). Case study research-Design and methods. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
