Project management maturity models are important assessment tools for the profession. Maturity models identify organizational strengths and weaknesses as well as provide benchmarking information. They capture explicit, codified practice (know-what), but do not include the intangible assets of project management (know-how). Some have made the claim that project management maturity models (MMs) can lead to a competitive advantage for firms. This paper uses four resource-based frameworks to assess whether or not maturity models lead to a sustained competitive advantage. In the context of the strategy domain, the authors conclude that MMs can result in a temporary competitive advantage but not a sustained competitive advantage. Clearly, a sustained competitive advantage is rooted in a combination of know-what and know-how.
Australian Institute of Project Management. (2000). National competency standards for project management. Retreived 15 May 2001 from http://www.prince2.org.uk/introduction.htm
5.
BarneyJ.B. (1986). Types of competition and the theory of strategy: Toward an integrative framework. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 791–800.
6.
BarneyJ.B. (1989). Asset stocks and sustained competitive advantage: A comment. Management Science, 35(12), 1511–1514.
7.
BarneyJ.B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
8.
BarneyJ.B. (1998). On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 37(1), 31–46.
9.
BarneyJ.B. (2002). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
10.
BarneyJ.B., & ZajacE.J. (1994). Competitive organizational behavior: Toward an organizationally based theory of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(1), 5–9.
11.
BelassiW., & TukelO.I. (1996). A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 14(3), 141–152.
BoundsG. (1998). The last word on project management. Institute of Industrial Engineers Solutions, 30(11), 41–43.
14.
BrushC.G., GreeneP.G., HartM.M., & HallerH.S. (2001). From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. The Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 64–78.
15.
CabanisJ. (1998). Show me the money: A panel of experts dissects popular notions of measuring project management maturity. PM Network, 12(9), 53–60.
16.
Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute. (2002). Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute: Capability maturity models. Carnegie Mellon University. Retrieved 15 May 2002, from http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/
17.
ChandlerA.D. (1962). The concept of corporate strategy. In FossN. (Ed.). Resources, firms, and strategies: A reader in the resource-based perspective (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 52–59). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
CollisD.J. (1994). Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities?Strategic Management Journal, 15(1), 143–152.
19.
CollisD.J., & MontgomeryC.A. (1995). Competing on resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 118–128.
Cooke-DaviesT. (2002). Establishing the link between project management practices and project success. Paper presented at the Frontiers of Project Management Research and Application Conference, Seattle, WA.
22.
DinsmoreP.C. (1998). How grown-up is your organization?PM Network, 12(6), 24–26.
23.
DorlingA. (1993). SPICE: Software process improvement and capability determination. Software Quality Journal, 2(4), 209–224.
24.
DuncanW.J., GinterP.M., & SwayneL.E. (1998). Competitive advantage and internal organizational assessment. The Academy of Management Executive, 12(3), 6–16.
25.
DymondK.M. (1995). A guide to the CMM: Understanding the capability maturity model for software.Annapolis, MD: Process Transition International Inc.
26.
FloydS.W., & LaneP.J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Management role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management, 25(1), 154–177.
27.
FloydS.W., & WoolridgeB. (1992a). Managing strategic consensus: The foundation of effective implementation. The Executive, 6(4), 27–42.
28.
FloydS.W., & WoolridgeB. (1992b). Middle management involvement in strategy and its association with strategic type: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 13(Special Issue), 153–167.
29.
FloydS.W., & WoolridgeB. (1994). Dinosaurs or dynamos? Recognizing middle management's strategic role. The Academy of Management Executive, 8(4), 47–59.
30.
FloydS.W., & WoolridgeB. (1997). Middle management's strategic influence and organizational performance. The Journal of Management Studies, 34(3), 465–485.
31.
FossN.J. (Ed.). (1997). Resources, firms, and strategies: A reader in the resource-based perspective (1st ed., Vol. 1). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32.
GrantR.M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.
33.
HamelG. (1995). Reinventing the company. Executive Excellence, 12(10), 9–13.
JonkerJ. (2000). Organizations as responsible contributors to society: Linking quality, sustainability and accountability. Total Quality Management, 11(4.6), S741–S748.
41.
Jugdev, K., & Thomas, J. (14–17 July 2002a). Blueprint for value creation: Developing and sustaining a project management competitive advantage through the resource based view. Paper presented at the Project Management Institute Research Conference 2002: Frontiers of Project Management Research and Application, Seattle, WA.
42.
Jugdev, K., & Thomas, J. (3–10 October 2002b). From operational process to strategic asset: The evolution of project management's value in organizations. Paper presented at the Project Management Institute 33rd Annual Symposium and Conference, San Antonio, TX.
43.
KerznerH. (2001). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (7th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
44.
KujalaJ., & ArttoK. (2000). Criteria for project performance in business context. Project Management, 6(7), 46–53.
45.
LambertsonL. (2001). Personal communication.Arlington, VA: ESI-International.
MarkidesC.C., & WilliamsonP.J. (1994). Related diversification, core competences, and corporate performance. In FossN. (Ed.). Resources, firms, and strategies: A reader in the resource-based perspective (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 327–344). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48.
MataF.J., FuerstW.L., & BarneyJ.B. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 487–507.
49.
NonakaI. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.
50.
PennypackerJ. (2001). Project management maturity benchmark: A Center for Business Practices (CBP) research report (Published manuscript). Havertown, PA: Project Management Solutions Inc.
51.
PenroseE.T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. In FossN. (Ed.). Resources, firms, and strategies: A reader in the resource-based perspective (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 27–39). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
52.
PeterafM. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. In FossN. (Ed.). Resources, firms, and strategies: A reader in the resource-based perspective (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 187–203). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
53.
PMI Standards Committee. (2000). A guide to the project management body of knowledge.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
54.
PorterM.E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12(Winter Special Issue), 97–117.
55.
PorterM.E. (1996). What is strategy?Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–78.
56.
PrahaladC.K., & HamelG. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. In FossN. (Ed.). Resources, firms, and strategies: A reader in the resource-based perspective (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 235–256). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
57.
PriemR.L., & ButlerJ.E. (2001a). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research?Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 26–40.
58.
PriemR.L., & ButlerJ.E. (2001b). Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: Further comments. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 57–66.
59.
ReedR., & DeFillippiR.J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88–102.
60.
RumeltR.P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In FossN. (Ed.). Resources, firms, and strategies: A reader in the resource-based perspective (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 131–145). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
61.
RumeltR.P., SchendelD.E., & TeeceD.J. (1994). Fundamental issues in strategy. In RumeltR.P., SchendelD.E., & TeeceD.J. (Eds.). Fundamental issues in strategy (pp. 9–47). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
SchlichterJ. (2000). Personal communication with Kam Jugdev.Upper Darby, PA: Project Management Institute.
64.
SchulzeW.S. (1994). Two resource-based theories of the firm: Definitions and implications. In SchrivistavaP., HuffA., & DuttonJ.E. (Eds.). Advances in Strategic Management, (Vol. 10, pp. 127–151). New York: JAI Press.
65.
SelznickP. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. In FossN. (Ed.). Resources, firms, and strategies: A reader in the resource-based perspective (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 21–26). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
TeeceD.J. (1980). Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. In FossN. (Ed.). Resources, firms, and strategies: A reader in the resource-based perspective (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 103–116). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
70.
ThomasH., PollockT., & GormanP. (1999). Global strategic analysis: Frameworks and approaches. The Academy of Management Executive, 13(1), 70–82.
71.
ThomasJ., DelisleC., & JugdevK. (2002). Framing the moves that matter: Selling project management to senior executives: A research monograph (1st ed., Vol. 1). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
UlriB., & UlriD. (2000). Project management in North America: Stability of the concepts. Project Management Journal, 31(3), 33–43.
74.
WernerfeltB. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. In FossN. (Ed.). Resources, firms, and strategies: A reader in the resource-based perspective (1st ed., Vol.1, pp. 117–130). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
