Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Past research indicates that effective communication is one of the keys to successful project management. Unfortunately, because it involves people, communication is a complex and continually changing subject that is difficult to measure. Communication on today's projects is becoming increasingly complex. Technological complexity, multiple stakeholders, and compressed time frames are inundating project managers with a sea of information. While most project managers agree that good communication is vital to project success, there are few tools that are available for measuring project performance. This paper presents a social network analysis (SNA) approach that has been used widely in the social sciences to analyze and measure how communication occurs between individuals and groups. The discussion includes a review of the basic concepts of SNA, provides background on data collection and analysis, and describes a case study where SNA was used to understand project communication performance.

Keywords

social network analysis project communications Internet/intranet applications communication networks

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

CII. (January 1997). An assessment tool for improving project communications. Publication 105-11, University of Texas at Austin.

Back

W.E.

, & Bell

(1994). Quantifying benefits attributable to electronic technology proceedings. 1994 American Association of Cost Engineers (AACE) Transactions, SI (1), 1–5.

Baldwin

A.N.

, Thorpe

, & Carter

(1996). The construction alliance and electronic information exchange: A symbiotic relationship. CIB-65. Glasgow, UK: Strathclyde University.

Basu

(1996). Impact of information technologies on construction project management. American Association of Cost Engineers Transactions. IT4.

Garton

, Haythornthwaite

, & Wellman

(1997). Studying online social neworks. Journal of Computer Mediated Construction, 3(1), 1–21.

Goldhaber

G.H.

(1986). Organizational communication. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.

Guevara

J.M.

, & Boyer

L.T.

(1981). Communication problems within construction. Journal of Construction Engineering, 107(4), 552–557.

Kochen

(Ed.). (1989). The small world. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Monge

P.R.

, & Eisenberg

E.M.

(1987). Emergent communication networks. In Jablin

F.M.

, Putnam

L.L.

, Roberts

K.H

(Eds.). Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.

10.

Rice

(1994). Network analysis and computer mediated communication systems. In Wasserman

, & Galaskiewicz

(Eds.), Perspectives on social network research, pp. 119–136. New York: Academic Press.

11.

Roberts

K.H.

, & O'Reilly

C.A.

(1978). Organizations as communication structures: An empirical approach. Human Communication Research, 4, 283–293.

12.

Rwelamila

P.D.

(1994, March). Group dynamics and construction project management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 120(1), 3–10.

13.

Sanvido

, Grobler

, Parfitt

, Guvenis

, & Coyle

(1992, March). Critical success factors for construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(1), 94–111.

14.

Thamhain

H.J.

(1992). Engineering management: Managing effectively in technology based organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

15.

Tichy

N.M.

, & Fombrun

(1979). Network analysis in organizational settings. Human Relations, 32, 923–965.

16.

Wasserman

, & Faust

(1994). Social network analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Wellman

(1982). Studying personal communities. In Marsden

, & Lin

Y.N.

(Eds.), Social Structure and Network Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.

Using Social Network Analysis to Visualize Project Teams

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References