Enhancing your potential for publication of a manuscript in the Rural Special Education Quarterly is the focus of this article. The executive editor of the RSEQ presents information regarding historical themes of the Quarterly; the intended audience; the process for manuscript review and acceptance; and hints for enhancing acceptance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HelgeD. (1980). National research comparing rural special education delivery systems before and after implementation of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975.Murray, KY: Murray Sate University. National Education Center.
2.
HelgeD. (1983). Images: Issues and trends in rural special education.Murray KY: Murray State University, National Rural Research and Personnel Preparation Project.
3.
HensonK. T. (1995, June). Writing for publication: Messages from editors.Phi Delta Kappan. 76(10)801–803.
4.
HensonK. T. (1997, June). Writing for publication: Some perennial mistakes.Phi Delta Kappan. 78(10)781–784.
5.
HepburnE. (1993, March). Meta-analysis of RSEQ publications (1982–19921Paper presented at the RSEQ editorial board meeting of the American Council on Rural Special Education.Savannah, GA
6.
MetzC. L. (1997, March). Meta-analysis of RSEQ publications (1993–1996). Paper presented at the RSEQ editorial board meeting of the American Council on Rural Special Education. San Antonio, TX.