Montana's Big Sky Country: A CSPD Runs through It!

Abstract

Montana, known as Big Sky Country, is a vast, varied, and sparsely populated state. Montana is rural and Montana's educators face the perennial problems of rural educators nationwide–professional isolation, inadequate funding and resources, and few professional development opportunities. In order to restructure and strengthen special education services throughout the state, Montana has supported growth of its Comprehensive System of Personnel Development (CSPD) Council at the state level and has initiated a council in each of the five special education regions. Montana's organizational structure for CSPD and the systems approach used for state and regional strategic planning provide a model for other rural states to consider.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Administrative Rule of Montana (ARM). (1993). 10.16.2719.

Collins,

B. C.

(1992). Identification of the advantages and disadvantages of special education service delivery in rural Kentucky as a basis for generating solutions to problems. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 11(3), 30–34.

Council for Exceptional Children. (1994). National Institute on Comprehensive System of Personnel Development Collaboration: Phase II. Continuation application for grants under training personnel for the Education of Individuals with Disabilities Special Projects, CFDA #84.029K. Reston, VA: Author.

Education of Handicapped Children. (1977, August). Federal Register, 42474–42518.

Elrod,

G. F.

, Insko,

, & Williams,

(1993). A descriptive study of instructional assistants in rural and remote Eastern Oregon: Implications for professional development. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 12(4), 22–30.

Fullan,

M. G.

(1990). Staff development, innovation, and institutional development. In Joyce

(Ed.), Changing school culture through staff development: 1990 yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 3–25). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Helge,

(1983). Images: Issues & trends in rural special education. Paper presented to the U.S. Office of Special Education. Bellingham, WA: Western Washington University.

Hopkins,

(1990). Integrating staff development and school improvement: A study of teacher personality and school climate. In Joyce

(Ed.), Changing school culture through staff development (pp. 41–70). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Joyce,

, & Showers,

(1982). The coaching of teaching. Educational Leadership, 40(1), 4–8.

10.

Joyce,

, & Showers,

(1983). Power in staff development through research on training. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

11.

Joyce,

, & Showers,

(1988). Student achievement through staff development. New York: Longman.

12.

Kelker,

, Garthwait,

, & Seligman,

(1992). Rural special education options. Human Services in the Rural Environment, 15(3), 14–17.

13.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 USCA § 1400 et seq. (LRP 1993).

14.

Minner,

, & Lepich,

(1993). The occupational stress of first-year urban and rural special educational teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 12(3), 33–35.

15.

Senge,

P. M.

(1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday Currency.

16.

Smith-Davis,

, Burke,

P. J.

, & Noel,

M. M.

(1984). Personnel to educate the handicapped in America: Supply and demand from a programmatic viewpoint. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, Institute for the Study of Exceptional Children and Youth (pp. 48–55, abridged). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 244 428)