Theorists and practitioners agree that involving families in the education of a child with a disability is beneficial to all concerned. Unfortunately, initiating and sustaining that involvement is often difficult, particularly in rural communities where distance factors may impede school involvement. In this article, a rationale for and challenges to family involvement are briefly reviewed. Finally, 21 already-been-tried practical strategies for involving rural families with disabled children are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anastasiow,N. (1986). The research base for early intervention. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 10, 99–105.
2.
Callahan,J. P., & Olson,J. (1994). Parent satisfaction with professionals having a family systems orientation to early intervention. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 13(2), 12–18.
3.
Collins,B. C. (1992). Identification of the advantages and disadvantages of special education service delivery in rural Kentucky as a basis for generating solutions to problems. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 11(3), 30–34.
4.
Constantine,L. L. (1986). Family paradigms: The practice of theory in family therapy. New York: Guilford.
5.
Correa,V. I. (1992). Cultural accessibility of services for culturally and linguistically diverse clients with disabilities and their families. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 11(2), 6–12.
6.
Garner,A. (1979). An examination of two-delivery models with regard to program effectiveness and extent of parent involvement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces.
7.
Hardman,M. L., Drew,C. J., Egan,M. W., & Wolf,B. (1993). Human exceptionality: Society, school, and family, 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
8.
Hill,J. (1993). The rural school principalship: Unique challenges, opportunities. NASSP Bulletin, 77(555), 77–81.
9.
Huebner,E. S., & Wise,P. S. (1992). Training preservice school psychologists to facilitate the implementation of the regular education initiative. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 11(3), 20–29.
10.
Jones,E. D., & Southern,J. W. (1992). Programming, grouping, and acceleration in rural school districts: A survey of attitudes and practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 112–118.
11.
Seligman,M., & Meyerson,R. (1982). Group approaches for parents of exceptional children. In SeligmanM. (Ed.), Group psychotherapy and counseling with special populations (pp. 99–116). Baltimore: University Park.
12.
Turnbull,A. P., & Turnbull,H. R.III., (1990). Families, professionals and exceptionality: A special partnership, 2nd ed. Columbus: Merrill.
