Transdisciplinary (TD) teaming appears to be an effective and appropriate approach to providing educational programming to students with disabilities in rural schools. This approach may contribute to special educators experiencing less isolation and to increased skill acquisition and maintenance by students. The purpose of this article is to provide practitioners with guidelines to consider when evaluating their approach to teaming for delivery of services to students with disabilities. An evaluation checklist is provided to assist practitioners in evaluating their teams and in implementing a TD approach to teaming.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baumgart,D., & Ferguson,D. L. (1991). Personnel preparation: Directions for the next decade. In MeyerL. H., PeckC. A., & BrownL. (Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp. 313–352). Baltimore: Brookes.
2.
Brown,L., Branston-MacLean,M. B., Baumgart,D., Vincent,L., Falvey,M., & Schroeder,J. (1979). Using the characteristics of current and future least restrictive environments in the development of curricular content for severely handicapped students.AAESPH Review, 4, 407–424.
3.
Campbell,P. H. (1987). The integrated programming team: An approach for coordinating professionals of various disciplines in programs for students with severe and multiple handicaps. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 107–116.
4.
Campbell,P. H., McInerney,W. F., & Cooper,M. A. (1984). Therapeutic programming for students with severe handicaps.The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 38, 594–602.
5.
Downing,J., & Bailey,B. R. (1990). Sharing the responsibility: Using a TD team approach to enhance the learning of students with severe disabilities. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 1, 259–278.
6.
Dunn,W. (1990). A comparison of service provision models in school-based occupational therapy services: A pilot study. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 10, 300–320.
7.
Fox,W., & Williams,L. (1991). Implementing best practices for all students in their local school. Burlington, VT: Center for Developmental Disabilities, University Affiliated Program of Vermont.
8.
Gold,V., Russell,S. C., & Williams,E. U. (1993). Special education in northwest Ohio: A case study of rural service delivery problems. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 12(3), 42–46.
9.
Landerholm,E. (1990). The TD team approach in infant programs.Teaching Exceptional Children, 22(2), 1–11.
10.
Lyon,S., & Lyon,G. (1980). Team functioning and staff development. A role release approach to providing integrated educational services for severely handicapped students.The Journal of The Association for the Severely Handicapped, 5, 250–263.
11.
Magrun,W. M., & Tigges,K. N. (1982). A TD mobile intervention program for rural areas.The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36(2), 90–94.
12.
Marvin,C. A. (1987). Consultation services: Changing roles for SLPs. Journal of Communication Disorders, 11, 1–15.
13.
McCormick,L., & Goldman,R. (1979). The TD model: Implications for service delivery and personnel preparation for the severely and profoundly handicapped. AAESPH Review, 4, 152–161.
14.
Minner,S., & Lepich,J. (1993). The occupational stress of first-year urban and rural special educational teachers.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 12(3), 33–35.
15.
Orelove,F. P., & Sobsey,D. (1991). Educating children with multiple disabilities: A TD approach (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes.
16.
Rainforth,B., Macdonald,C., York,J., & Dunn,W. (1992). An ecological model of curriculum: A natural context for therapy. In RainforthB., YorkJ., & MacdonaldC. (Eds.), Collaborative teams for students with severe disabilities: Integrating therapy and educational services (pp. 105–156). Baltimore: Brookes.
17.
Rainforth,B., & York,J. (1987). Integrating related services in community instruction.The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 190–198.
18.
Sears,C. J. (1981). The TD approach: A process for compliance with Public Law 94–142.The Journal of The Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6(1), 22–29.
19.
Smith,P. D. (1990). Integrating related services into programs for students with severe and multiple disabilities. Lexington, KY: Kentucky Systems Change Project.
20.
Sternat,J., Messina,R., Nietupski,J., Lyon,S., & Brown,L. (1977). Occupational and physical therapy services for severely handicapped students. In SontagE., SmithJ., & CertoN. (Eds.), Educational programming for the severely and profoundly handicapped (pp. 263–287). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
21.
Wolery,M., & Dyke,L. (1984). Arena assessment: Description and preliminary social validity data. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 178–185.
22.
York,J., Rainforth,B., & Giangreco,M. F. (1990). TD teamwork and integrated therapy: Clarifying the misconceptions. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 2(2), 73–39.
