The authors of this study compared the adult adjustment of a statewide random sample of 399 graduates and dropouts from high schools in rural areas with the adjustment of a statewide random sample of 541 of their counterparts from high schools in urban areas. These individuals were classified as learning disabled, behaviorally disordered, or mentally disabled. Information is provided on their employment, fringe benefits, living arrangements, and postsecondary education one and three years out of school. An overall composite delineating the level of successful adjustment of these individuals three years after leaving school is also provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
de Bettencourt,L., Zigmond,N., & Thornton,H. (1989). Follow-up of postsecondary-age rural learning disabled graduates and dropouts. Exceptional Children,56, 40-49.
Hasazi,S., Gordon,L., & Roe,C. (1985). Factors associated with the employment status of handicapped youth exiting high school from 1979 to 1983. Exceptional Children,51, 455-469.
4.
Reiss,A., Duncan,O., Hatt,P., & North,C. (1961). Occupations and social status.New York: Free Press
5.
Schalock,R., Holl,C., Elliott,B., & Ross,I. (1992). A longitudinal follow-up of graduates from a rural special education program. Learning Disability Quarterly,15, 29-38.
6.
SPSS-X User's Guide (2nd ed.) [Computer program manual]. (1986). Chicago: SPSS, Inc.
7.
Wagner,M., D'Amico,R., Marder,C., Newman,L., & Blackorby,J. (1992). What happens next? Trends in postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities. The second comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students.Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
8.
Wagner,M., Newman,L., D'Amico,R., Jay,E., Butler-Nalin,P., Marder,C., Cox,R. (1991). Youth with disabilities: How are they doing? The first comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students.Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
