This article identifies unique problems associated with developing gifted programs in rural settings. In examining the issue of planning, the article discusses the importance of making effective use of limited time and personnel, sensitivity during the identification procedure, creativity in financing and transportation, and commitment to a program specifically designed to meet local needs. In regard to people management, the article suggests dealing sensitively with community feelings, involving a broad range of local residents, and screening written material for understandability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonR. B. (1979). Rural education for the gifted: Activities of the University of Maine at Presque Isle.Presque Isle, Maine: University of Maine. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 171 025)
2.
BirnbaumM. J. (1978). Educational problems of rural education for the gifted in Ideas for urban/rural gifted/talented: Case histories and program plans.Los Angeles National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and Talented.
3.
McCuneA. D. (1980). Planning, implementing and evaluating a program in gifted education in small rural school districts.Halstead, KS: Halstead Rural High School District 1. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 164 805)
4.
MilneB. G. (1976). Programs for the gifted in rural areas.NASSP Bulletin, 55, pp. 60-66.
5.
NewlandT. E. (1976). The gifted in socio-educational perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Program design and development for gifted and talented students. (1980). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
6.
TuttleF. Jr., & BeckerL.A. (1980). Characteristics and identification of gifted and talented students.Washington, DC: National Education Association.
7.
Washington Association of Educators of the Talented and Gifted. (1985). Essentials for creating curriculum for the gifted.Seattle: Author.
