Rural Special Education Quarterly (RSEQ) is a journal that includes articles specific to rural special education and disability services. The journal provides “a forum for presentation of new research findings; description of innovative program models or current best practices; analysis of local, state, and national policies; and discussion of issues and trends for special education and related services personnel working in rural communities.” In keeping with its mission, manuscripts submitted to RSEQ undergo a rigorous peer review process. This article provides an overview of the peer review process and strategies for successfully reviewing manuscripts submitted to RSEQ. The remainder of this paper will provide a description of, and insights into, the review process for RSEQ.
AliP. A.WatsonR. (2016). Peer review and the publication process. Nursing Open, 3(4), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.51
2.
American Psychological Association. (2025, May5). Journal article reporting standards (JARS). APA Style. https://apastyle.apa.org/jars
3.
BillingsleyB.BettiniE. (2019). Special education teacher attrition and retention: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 89(5), 697–744.
4.
BjörkB. C.SolomonD. (2013). The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 914–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.001
5.
ButchardD.RowberryS.SquiresC.TaskerG. (2017). Peer review in practice. In RaynerS.LyonsR. (Eds.), Academic book of the future: BOOC. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781911307679.15
6.
ButtonK. S.BalL.ClarkA.ShipleyT. (2016). Preventing the ends from justifying the means: Withholding results to address publication bias in peer-review. BMC Psychology, 4(1), 59–59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0167-7
7.
ChalmersI.GlasziouP.GodleeF. (2013). All trials must be registered and the results published: Academics and non-commercial funders are just as guilty as industry. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 346(7890), 1–2. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23493534
8.
ChowJ. C.EkholmE. (2018). Do published studies yield larger effect sizes than unpublished studies in education and special education? A meta-review. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 727–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9437-7
9.
CookB.BuysseV.KlingnerJ.LandrumT.McWilliamR.TankersleyM.TestD. (2014). Council for Exceptional Children: Standards for evidence-based practices in special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(6), 206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914531389
10.
FoxK.BurgessA.WilliamsonM. E.MasseyJ.ShalerG.PearsonK.WardM. (2022). Implementation of telehealth services in rural schools: A qualitative assessment. Journal of School Health, 92(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13104
HainesS. T.BakerW. L.DiDomenicoR. J. (2017). Improving peer review: What journals can do. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 74(24), 2086–2089. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp170188
13.
HojatM.GonnellaJ. S.CaelleighA. S. (2003). Impartial judgment by the “gatekeepers” of science: Fallibility and accountability in the peer review process. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 8(1), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022670432373
14.
HottB.BrighamF.PeltierC. (2024). Research methods in special education. Taylor & Francis.
15.
KangJ.HaughneyK. L.VanUitertV. (2023). How to review forThe Journal of Case Learning and Exceptional Learners. The Journal of Case Learning and Exceptional Learners, 1(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.20429/jclel.2023.010103
LongJ. C.DelamaterP. L.HolmesG. M. (2021). Which definition of rurality should I use? The relative performance of 8 federal rural definitions in identifying rural-urban disparities. Medical Care, 59(5), S413–S419. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001612
MohtyM.MeloJ. V. (2025). How to perform a high-quality peer review. Clinical Hematology International, 7(1), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.46989/001c.128601
NelsonK. S.NguyenT. D.BrownsteinN. A.GarciaD.WalkerH. C.WatsonJ. T.XinA. (2021). Definitions, measures, and uses of rurality: A systematic review of the empirical and quantitative literature. Journal of Rural Studies, 82, 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.035
ShowalterD.HartmanS. L.EppleyK.JohnsonJ.KleinR. (2023). Why rural matters 2023: Centering equity and opportunity. National Rural Education Association. https://www.nrea.net/why-rural-matters
24.
SternbergR. J.GhahremaniM.EhsanH. (2023). Combating myside bias in scientific thinking: A special challenge for the gifted. Roeper Review, 45(3), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2023.2212361
25.
SutterC.DemchakM.SundeenT. (2025). Definitional issues of rural settings in special education research. Rural Special Education Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705251323255
26.
ThierM.LonghurstJ. M.GrantP. D.HockingJ. E. (2021). Research deserts: A systematic mapping review of U.S. rural education definitions and geographies. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 37(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.26209/JRRE3702
27.
TomkinsA.ZhangM.HeavlinW. D. (2017). Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(48), 12708–12713. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707323114
What Works Clearinghouse. (2022). What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook, version 5.0. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
