Co-teaching may be a promising strategy to improve inclusive secondary mathematics education in rural schools. Professional development (PD) aids in special and general education teachers’ co-teaching implementation, yet little empirical research examines how to effectively train and support co-teachers. In this study, we describe one U.S. state’s PD model for secondary mathematics co-teaching, evaluate outcomes of the PD on co-teachers’ behaviors and beliefs, and examine the impact of co-teaching on students’ mathematics achievement. We examined data from observations, surveys, and students’ pre/post assessments across nine classes within seven U.S. school districts, including three rural school districts, over 3 years. We report data from a total of 19 teachers and 281 students in sixth through ninth grades. The PD participants implemented effective co-teaching strategies and reported positive viewpoints toward co-teaching. Additionally, students with and without disabilities improved their mathematics scores. We present key findings for rural schools to guide future implementation and research.
BarrioB. L.HollingsheadA. (2017). Reaching out to paraprofessionals: Engaging professional development aligned with universal design for learning framework in rural communities. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 36(3), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870517721693
2.
BerryA. B. (2021). Understanding shared responsibility between special and general education teachers in the rural classroom. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 40(2), 95–105.
3.
BoalerJ. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass.
4.
BoudahD. J.SchumacherJ. B.DeschlerD. D. (1997). Collaborative instruction: Is it an effective option for inclusion in secondary classrooms?Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 20(4), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511227
ColsonT.XiangY.SmothersM. (2021). How professional development in co-teaching impacts self-efficacy among rural high school teachers. The Rural Educator, 42(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v42i1.897
7.
CookL.FriendM. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v28i3.6852
8.
CookS. C.McDuffie-LandrumK. (2020). Integrating effective practices into co-teaching: Increasing outcomes for students with disabilities. Intervention in School & Clinic, 55(4), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451219855739
9.
CookS. G.McDuffie-LandrumK. A.OshitaL.CookS. C. (2011). Co-teaching and students with disabilities. A critical analysis of the empirical literature. In HallahanD. P.KauffmanJ. P. (Eds.), The handbook of special education (pp. 147–159). Routledge.
FriendM.CookL.Hurley-ChamberlainD.ShambergerC. (2010). Co-teaching: An illustration of the complexity of collaboration in special education. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20, 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410903535380
12.
HangQ.RabrenK. (2009). An examination of co-teaching: Perspectives and efficacy indicators. Remedial and Special Education, 30(5), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508321018
13.
HoffmanJ. A.Anderson-ButcherD.FullerM.BatesS. (2017). The school experiences of rural youths: A study in Appalachian Ohio. Children and Schools, 39(3), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdx010
14.
HottB. L.DibbsR.NaizerG.RaymondL.CampbellC. R.MartinA. (2019). Practitioner perceptions of algebra strategy and intervention use to support students with mathematics difficulty or disability in rural Texas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 38(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870518795494
15.
HottB. L.MoranoS.PeltierC.PulosJ.PeltierT. (2020). Are students with mathematics learning disabilities receiving FAPE? Insights from a descriptive review of individualized education programs. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 35(4), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12231
16.
IndrisanoR.BirminghamN.GarnickS.MarescoD. K. (1999). A co-teaching model for literacy education. Journal of Education, 181(1), 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205749918100106
17.
IsherwoodR. S.Barger-AndersonR. (2008). Factors affecting the adoption of co-teaching models in inclusive classrooms: One school’s journey from mainstreaming to inclusion. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 2, 121–128.
18.
MagieraK.SmithC.ZigmondN.GebauerK. (2005). Benefits of co-teaching in secondary mathematics classes. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37(3), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990503700303
19.
MagieraK.ZigmondN. (2005). Co-teaching in middle school classrooms under routine conditions: Does the instructional experience differ for students with disabilities in co- taught and solo-taught classes?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(2), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00123.x
20.
MarzanoR. J.BoogrenT. H.HeflebowerT.Kanold-McIntyreJ.PickeringD. J. (2012). Becoming a reflective teacher. Marzano Resources.
21.
MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E.GraetzJ.NorlandJ.GardiziW.McDuffieK. (2005). Case studies in co-teaching in the content areas: Successes, failures, and challenges. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40(5), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512050400050201
22.
MuellerT. G.BrewerR. D. (2013). Rethinking professional development in rural communities for students with autism spectrum disorder. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 32(3), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051303200303
MurawskiW. W.SwansonH. L. (2001). A meta-analysis of co-teaching research: Where are the data?Remedial & Special Education, 22(5), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250102200501
NicholsJ.DowdyA.NicholsC. (2010). Co-teaching: An educational promise for children with disabilities or a quick fix to meet the mandates of no child left behind?Education, 130(4), 647–651.
30.
NierengartenG. (2013). Supporting co-teaching teams in high schools: Twenty research-based practices. American Secondary Education, 42(1), 73–83.
31.
OyenK. A.Wollersheim-ServeyS. (2018). An examination of critical features of positive frameworks: Impact in rural environments for school-based practitioners. Contemporary School Psychology, 23(4), 388–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-018-0198-6
32.
PancsofarN.PetroffJ. G. (2016). Professional development experiences in co-teaching: Associations with teacher confidence, interests, and attitudes. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406412474996
33.
PearlC.DiekerL. A.KirkpatrickR. M. (2012). A five-year retrospective on the Arkansas department of education co-teaching project. Professional Development in Education, 38(4), 571–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.668858
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.McDuffieK. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 392–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707300401
36.
ShafferL.Thomas-BrownK. (2015). Enhancing teacher competency through co-teaching and embedded professional development. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(3), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i3.685
SolisM.VaughnS.SwansonE.McculleyL. (2012). Collaborative models of instruction: The empirical foundations of inclusion and co-teaching. Psychology in the Schools, 49(5), 498–510. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21606
WischnowskiM. W.SalmonS. J.EatonK. (2004). Evaluating co-teaching as a means for successful inclusion of students with disabilities in a rural district. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 23(3), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687050402300302
