This study examined the effects of sound-field amplification (SFA) use for children who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) with additional diagnosed conditions enrolled in preschool and first and second grades in a rural district. Four focus children who are DHH with additional diagnoses were matched with hearing peers and observed for attending behaviors and latency in compliance to following routine directions with introduction of SFA. The study used a single-case multiple probe across participants design. All participants demonstrated improved attending behaviors and compliance to directions with SFA, with the focus children who are DHH with additional diagnoses showing stronger results than their hearing peers. Teachers indicated SFA was beneficial to the children who are DHH and they would use it again. SFA is an effective strategy to improve access to educational opportunities by increasing attending behaviors and promoting participation for children who are DHH with other diagnoses in special and general education preschool and first and second grades.
AndersonK. (2010, November). Listening and learning in a sea of noise [Paper presentation]. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, San Diego, CA, United States.
4.
AndersonK. L.GoldsteinH. (2004). Speech perception benefits of FM and infrared devices to children with hearing aids in a typical classroom. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35, 169–184.
5.
AndersonK. L.SmaldinoJ. J. (1998). LIFE—Listening Inventory for Education: An efficacy tool: Teacher appraisal of listening difficulty. Educational Audiology Association.
AntiaS. D.RiveraM. C. (2016). Instruction and service time decisions: Itinerant services to deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 21, 293–302.
8.
BennettsL.FlynnM. (2002). Improving the classroom listening skills of children with Down syndrome by using sound-field amplification. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 8(1), 19–24.
9.
BessF.Dodd-MurphyJ.ParkerR. (1998). Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: Prevalence, educational performance, and functional status. Ear and Hearing, 19, 330–354.
10.
BoswellS. (2006). Sound field systems on the rise in schools: Improved test scores cited as a benefit. The ASHA Leader, 11(7), 1–33.
11.
CheckerL. J.RemineM. D.BrownM. (2009). Deaf and hearing impaired children in regional and rural areas: Parent views on educational services. Deafness & Education International, 11, 21–38.
12.
CornwellS.EvansC. (2001). The effects of sound-field amplification on attending behaviors. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 25, 135–144.
13.
CrandellC. (1991). The effects of classroom amplification on children with normal hearing: Implications for intervetnion strategies.Educational Audiology Monograph, 2, 18–38.
14.
CrandellC.BessF. (1986, October). Speech recognition of children in a “typical” classroom setting. ASHA, 82.
15.
CrandellC.CharltonM.KinderM.KreismanB. M. (2001). Effects of portable sound field FM systems on speech perception in noise. Educational Audiology Journal, 9, 7–12.
16.
CrandellC.SmaldinoJ. (2000). Classroom acoustics for children with normal hearing and with hearing impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 362–370.
17.
FlexerC.BileyK. K.HinkleyA.HarkemaC.HolcombJ. (2002). Using sound-field systems to teach phonemic awareness to pre-schoolers. The Hearing Journal, 55(3), 38, 40, 44.
18.
FlexerC.LongS. (2003). Sound-field amplification: Preliminary information regarding special education referrals. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 25, 29–34.
19.
HolstrumW. J.GaffneyM.GravelJ. S.OylerR. F.RossD. S. (2008). Early intervention for children with unilateral and mild bilateral degrees of hearing loss. Trends in Amplification, 12, 35–41.
20.
HornerR.BaerD. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation of the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196.
JohnsonC. E. (2000). Children’s phoneme identification in reverberation and noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 144–157.
24.
Kazmierczak-MurrayS.DownesP. (2015). Classroom sound field amplification systems for language development during early school years in contexts of socio-economic exclusion: The neglected role of classroom contextual dimensions. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 7, 24–50.
25.
KennedyC. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Pearson.
26.
LarsenJ. B.BlairJ. C. (2008). The effect of classroom amplification on the signal-to-noise ratio in classrooms while class is in session. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 451–460.
27.
LeavittR.FlexerC. (1991). Speech degradation as measured by the Rapid Speech Transmission Index (RASTI). Ear and Hearing, 12, 115–118.
28.
LedfordJ. R.LaneJ. D.GastD. L. (2018). Dependent variables, measurement, and reliability. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed., pp. 97–131). Routledge.
29.
LeungS.McPhersonB. (2006). Classrooms for children with developmental disabilities: Sound-field and public address amplification systems compared. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 53, 287–299.
30.
MaagJ.AndersonJ. (2006). Effects of sound-field amplification to increase compliance of students with emotional and behavior disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 31, 378–393.
31.
MaagJ.AndersonJ. (2007). Sound field amplification to increase compliance to directions in students with ADHD. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 238–254.
32.
MassieR.DillonH. (2006). The impact of sound-field amplification in mainstream cross-cultural classrooms: Part I educational outcomes. Australian Journal of Education, 50, 62–77.
NelsonL. H.PooleB.MuñozK. (2013). Preschool teachers’ perceptions and use of hearing assistive technology in educational settings. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 239–251.
36.
PalmerC. (1998). Quantification of the ecobehavioral impact of a soundfield loudspeaker system in elementary classrooms. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 819–833.
37.
PrestonJ. P.JakubiecB. A. E.KooymansR. (2013). Common challenges faced by rural principals: A review of the literature. The Rural Educator, 35(1), 1–12.
WilsonW. J.MarinacJ.PittyK.BurrowsC. (2011). The use of sound-field amplification devices in different types of classrooms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42, 395–407.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
