National- and state-level education policies are evolving to address teacher shortages that are pervasive across the United States and are particularly problematic in rural special education. In this article, we describe a policy we call “endorsement by exam” in which teachers certified in one subject area can become certified in other areas by passing a content knowledge test. Although such add-on endorsements are not uncommon in some content areas (e.g., chemistry teachers adding certification in biology), some states have extended this practice to include special education certification. The purpose of this article is to explore what state agencies have adopted endorsement by exam for special education. Despite difficulties in obtaining reliable information, we determined approximately eight states have adopted some form of this policy. We discuss results in terms of rurality and conclude by explaining our position that endorsement by exam is a potentially harmful quick fix that may in fact exacerbate teacher shortages in the long term and thus is ill advised.
AngristJ.GuryanJ. (2003). Does teacher testing raise teacher quality? Evidence from state certification requirements. The National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w9545
AssoulineS. G.ColangeloN.VanTassel-BaskaJ.ShoplikA. (2014). A nation empowered: Evidence trumps beliefs that hold back America’s brightest students. Iowa City, IA: Belin-Blank Center.
4.
BillingsleyB. (2004). Special education teacher retention and attrition: A critical analysis of the research literature. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 39–55.
5.
BlanchardM. R.LePrevostC. E.TolinA. D.GutierrezK. S. (2016). Investigating technology-enhanced teacher professional development in rural, high-poverty middle schools. Educational Researcher, 45, 207–220. doi:10.3102/0013189X16644602
6.
BrownellM. T.BishopA. M.SindelarP. T. (2018). Republication of “NCLB and the demand for highly qualified teachers: Challenges and solutions for rural schools.”Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37, 4–11. doi:10.1177/8756870517749604
7.
CameronD. L.CookB. G. (2007). Preservice teachers enrolled in an infusion preparation program regarding planning and accommodations for included students with mental retardation. Education Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 353–363.
8.
Darling-HammondL.ChungR.FrelowF. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach?Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 286–302. doi:10.1177/0022487102053004002
9.
DavisG. A.RimmS. B.SiegleD. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
10.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95 § 114 Stat. 1177. (2015–2016).
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (1995). What’s “special” about special education?Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 522–530.
14.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.SteckerP. M. (2010). The “blurring” of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children, 76, 301–323.
15.
HagerK. D. (2011). Web conferencing with distance alternative certification students. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 30, 49–55.
16.
HagerK. D.BairdC. M.SpriggsA. D. (2012). Remote teacher observation at the University of Kentucky. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31, 3–8.
17.
HawleyL. R.KoziolN. A.BovairdJ. A.McCormickC. M.WelchG. W.ArthurA. M.BashK. (2016). Defining and describing rural: Implications for rural special education research and policy. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 35(3), 3–11.
18.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
19.
KerchevalH. (2017, February20). Teacher vacancies reach crisis level. MetroNews. Available from http://wvmetronews.com
McFarlandJ.HussarB.WangX.ZhangJ.WangK.RathbunA.. . . Bullock MannF. (2018). The condition of education 2018 (NCES 2018-144). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2018144
22.
McLeskeyJ.TylerN. C.FlippinS. S. (2004). The supply of and demand for special education teachers: A review of research regarding the chronic shortage of special education teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 5–21.
23.
National Education Association. (2017). Research spotlight on alternative routes to teacher certification: NEA reviews of the research on best practices in education. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/tools/16578.htm
24.
NewmanL.WagnerM.HuangT.ShaverD.KnokeyA. M.YuJ.. . . CametoR. (2011). Secondary school programs and performance of students with disabilities. A special topic report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2012-3000). Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research, U.S. Department of Education.
25.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002).
ReddingC.SmithT. M. (2016). Easy in, easy out: Are alternatively certified teachers turning over at increased rates?American Educational Research Journal, 53, 1086–1125. doi:10.3102/0002831216653206
29.
RosenbergM. S.SindelarP. T. (2005). The proliferation of alternative routes to certification in special education: A critical review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 117–127.
30.
RudeH.MillerK. J. (2018). Policy challenges and opportunities for rural special education. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37, 21–29. doi:10.1177/8756870517748662
31.
SauterM. B.StebbinsS.ComenE. (2018, August27). 24/7 Wall Street: Which state tops list for having the best and worst economies?USA Today. Available from https://www.usatoday.com
ShipC. R. (2014). Teacher certification routes and their relationship to teacher attrition (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (Accession No. 10157925)
SindelarP. T.PuaD. J.FisherT.PeytonD. J.BrownellM. T.Mason-WilliamsL. (2018). The demand for special education teachers in rural schools revisited: An update on progress. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37, 12–20. doi:10.1177/8756870517749247
36.
SutcherL.Darling-HammondL.Carver-ThomasD. (2016). Coming crisis in teaching? Teacher supply, demand, and shortages in the U.S. (Research brief). Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Recent trends in mean scores and characteristics of test-takers on Praxis II licensure tests. Washington, DC: Office of planning, evaluation and policy development, policy and program studies service. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/teaching/praxis-ii/report.pdf
39.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). Rural education in America: Publications and products (Table A.1.a.-1: Number of public school districts by district urban-centric 12-category locale and state or jurisdiction: 2013–14). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ruraled/
WehrsD. L. (2018). Ease or accuracy: Examining the relationship between observational evaluation or Praxis II (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (Accession No. 10817626)
West Virginia Department of Education. (2017). Regulations for the education of students with exceptionalities effective August 14, 2017. Retrieved from https://wvde.state.wv.us/osp/policy2419.html
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
