Two case studies were utilized to teach math skills while embedding the constant time delay teaching strategy. The study targeted children who were at risk for having mathematic difficulty in school due to disabilities, socioeconomic status, and living in a rural area. Four 3- to 5-year-old children with disabilities who attended rural inclusive preschool programs participated. Results indicated that early math skills were acquired with high levels of accuracy when compared with baseline data. Due to the end of the school year, one of the four children did not participate in maintenance or generalization data sessions. However, of the three children who participated, skills were maintained and/or generalized with 100% accuracy.
AldemirO.GurselO. (2014). The effectiveness of the constant time delay procedure in teaching pre-school academic skills to children with developmental disabilities in a small group teaching arrangement. Education Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14, 733–740.
2.
ArnoldD. H.FisherP. H.DoctoroffG. L.DobbsJ. (2002). Accelerating mathematics development in Head Start classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 762–770.
3.
Artman-MeekerK.FettigA.BartonE.PenneyA.ZengS. (2015). Applying an evidence-based framework to the early childhood coaching literature. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35, 183–196.
4.
BrickerD., & (Series Ed.). (2002). Assessment, evaluation, and programming for infants and children (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
5.
ClarkC.McDonnellA. (2008). Teaching choice making to children with visual impairments and multiple disabilities in preschool and kindergarten classrooms. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102, 397–409.
6.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2008). Experimental evaluation of the effects of a research-based preschool mathematics curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 443–494.
7.
CollinsB. (2012). Systematic instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
8.
Craig-UnkeferL. A.KaiserA. (2002). Improving the social communication skills of at-risk preschool children in a play context. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22, 3–13.
9.
CrawfordR. V. (2014). Training teaching assistants to implement systematic teaching strategies in preschool classrooms with reliability (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Kentucky, Lexington.
10.
DaughertyS.Grisham-BrownJ.HemmeterM. L. (2001). The effects of embedded skill instruction on the acquisition of target and nontarget skills in preschoolers with developmental delays. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21, 213–221.
11.
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP.. . . JapelC. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446.
12.
EpsteinA. S. (2009). Numbers plus preschool mathematics curriculum. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
13.
GarfinkleA. N.SchwartzI. S. (2002). Peer imitation: Increasing social interactions in children with autism and other developmental disabilities in inclusive preschool classrooms. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22, 26–29.
14.
GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (2014). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
15.
GrahamS. E.ProvostL. E. (2012, Summer). Mathematics achievement gaps between suburban students and their rural and urban peers over time (Issue Brief No. 52). Durham, NH: Carsey Institute.
16.
Grisham-BrownJ. L.HemmeterM. L. (2017). Blended practices for teaching young children in inclusive settings (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
17.
Grisham-BrownJ. L.Pretti-FrontczakK.BachmanA.GannonC.MitchellD. (2014). Delivering individualized instruction during ongoing classroom activities and routines: Three success stories (YEC Monograph 16: Blended Practices for All Children). Los Angeles, CA: Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children.
18.
Grisham-BrownJ. L.Pretti-FrontczakK.HawkinsS.WinchellB. (2009). Addressing early learning standards for all children within blended preschool classrooms. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 131–142.
19.
Grisham-BrownJ. L.RidgleyR.Pretti-FrontczakK.LittC.NielsonA. (2006). Promoting positive learning outcomes for young children in inclusive classrooms: A Preliminary study of children’s progress toward pre-writing standards. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 3, 171–190.
20.
Grisham-BrownJ. L.SchusterJ. W.HemmeterM. L.CollinsB. C. (2000). Using an embedding strategy to teach preschoolers with significant disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 139–162.
21.
HardyJ. K.Hawkins-LearS.HemmeterM. L.Grisham-BrownJ. (2017). Blended practices for promoting mathematics skills. In Grisham-BrownJ.HemmeterM. L. (Eds.), Blended practices for teaching young children in inclusive settings (2nd ed., pp. 311–338). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
22.
HornE.LieberJ.LiS.SandallS.SchwartzI. (2000). Supporting young children’s IEP goals in inclusive settings through embedded learning opportunities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 208–223.
23.
JohnstonS.NelsonC.EvansJ.PalazoloK. (2003). The use of visual supports in teaching young children with autism spectrum disorder to initiate interactions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 86–103.
KohlerF. W.AnthonyL. J.SteighnerS. A.HoysonM. (2001). Teaching social interaction skills in the integrated preschool: An examination of naturalistic tactics. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21, 93–103.
MacyM. G.BrickerD. D. (2007). Embedding individualized social goals into routine activities in inclusive early childhood classrooms. Early Child Development and Care, 177, 107–120.
28.
National Association for the Education of Young Children & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2010). Early childhood mathematics: Promoting good beginnings (A joint positive statement of NAEYC and NCTM). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
29.
OdluyurtS. (2011). The effects of constant time delay embedded into teaching activities for teaching the names of clothes to preschool children with developmental disabilities. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11, 1457–1460.
30.
OdomS. L.FlemingK.DiamondK.LieberJ.HansonM.ButeraG.. . . MarquisJ. (2010). Examining different forms of implementation and in early childhood curriculum research. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 314–328.
31.
Office of Head Start. (2015). Head start early learning outcomes framework: Ages birth to five. Arlington, VA: Office of Head Start, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
32.
Pretti-FrontczakK.Grisham-BrownJ.HawkinsS. R.JacksonS. (2012). An activity-based approach to intervention: Meeting the diverse needs of young children with special needs. In YuenJ.LyenK.PoonK.HinL.PathnapuramM. (Eds.), Rainbow dreams (3rd ed., pp. 209–223). Singapore: Rainbow Centre.
33.
RakapS. (2017). Impact of coaching on preservice teachers’ use of embedded instruction in inclusive preschool classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 68, 125–139.
34.
RamaniG. B.SieglerR. S.HittiA. (2012). Taking it to the classroom: Number board games as a small group learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 661–672.
35.
SnyderP.HemmeterM. L.FoxL. (2015). Supporting implementation of evidence-based practices through practice-based coaching. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35, 133–143.
36.
StarkeyP.KleinA.WakeleyA. (2004). Enhancing young children’s mathematical knowledge through a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 99–120.
37.
ToelkenS.MiltenbergerR. G. (2012). Increasing independence among children diagnosed with autism using a brief embedded teaching strategy. Behavioral Interventions, 27, 93–104.
38.
WoleryM.AnthonyL.CaldwellN. K.SnyderE. D.MorganteJ. D. (2002). Embedding and distributing constant time delay in circle time and transitions. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22, 14–25.
