Understanding the contexts in which young children develop is essential for promoting positive outcomes. In this study, the researchers used focus groups to investigate the perspectives of 14 parents across rural North Carolina concerning ecocultural features that enhanced or prevented sustained engagement with their infants and toddlers with disabilities or delays. Parents perceived ecocultural features as having either a positive influence or no influence on their engagement. They also reported actively making accommodations to interrupt potential barriers to engagement. Results highlight the adaptive capacities of families in rural communities and delineate community resources that might contribute to sustainable intervention practices.
BernheimerL. P.WeisnerT. S. (2007). “Let me just tell you what I do all day . . .”: The family story at the center of intervention research and practice. Infants & Young Children, 20, 192–201.
2.
ButeraG.MaughanG. (2001). Seeing through the fence rows: Early intervention, children and families in rural places. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 20, 12–19.
3.
ByersP. Y.WilcoxJ. R. (1991). Focus groups: A qualitative opportunity for researchers. Journal of Business Communication, 28, 63–78.
4.
CampbellP. H.SawyerL. B. (2007). Supporting learning opportunities in natural settings through participation-based services. Journal of Early Intervention, 29, 287–305.
5.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
DarlingS. M.GallagherP. A. (2004). Needs of and supports for African American and European American caregivers of young children with special needs in urban and rural settings. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 24, 98–109.
DunstC. J. (2012). Parapatric speciation in the evolution of early intervention for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31, 208–215. doi:10.1177/0271121411426904
9.
ElfordL. M. (2015). Mothers’ lived experience of parenting an infant/young child with special needs in a rural context (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from University of Western Ontario Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. (2688)
10.
FantuzzoJ.McWayneC.PerryM. A.ChildsS. (2004). Multiple dimensions of family involvement and their relations to behavioral and learning competencies for urban, low-income children. School Psychology Review, 33, 467–480.
11.
GallimoreR.WeisnerT. S.KaufmanS. Z.BernheimerL. P. (1989). The social construction of ecocultural niches: Family accommodation of developmentally delayed children. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 94, 216–230.
12.
GraceC.ShoresE. F.ZaslowM.BrownB.AufseeserD.BellL. (2011). Rural disparities in baseline data of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study: A chartbook (Rural Early Childhood Report No. 3). National Center for Rural Early Childhood Learning Initiatives, Mississippi State University Early Childhood Institute. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED495855.pdf
13.
HaringK. A.LovettD. L. (2001). Early intervention and early childhood services for families in rural areas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 20, 3–11.
14.
HwangA. W.ChaoM. Y.LiuS. W. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of routines-based early intervention for children with or at risk for developmental delay. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 3112–3123.
15.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
16.
JungL. A.McCormickK.JolivetteK. (2004). Early intervention in rural natural environments: Making the most of your time. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 23(3), 30–35.
17.
Kellar-GuentherY.RosenbergS. A.BlockS. R.RobinsonC. C. (2014). Parent involvement in early intervention: What role does setting play?Early Years, 34, 81–93.
18.
KeoghB. K.GarnierH. E.BernheimerL. P.GallimoreR. (2000). Models of child-family interactions for children with developmental delays: Child-driven or transactional?American Journal on Mental Retardation, 105, 32–46.
19.
LichterD. T.JohnsonK. M. (2007). The changing spatial concentration of America’s rural poor population. Rural Sociology, 72, 331–358.
20.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
SchleeB. M.MullisA. K.ShrinerM. (2009). Parents social and resource capital: Predictors of academic achievement during early childhood. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 227–234.
25.
SeltzerM. M.GreenbergJ. S.FloydF. J.PetteeY.HongJ. (2001). Life course impacts of parenting a child with a disability. Journal Information, 106, 265–286.
26.
StonemanZ.Gavidia-PayneS. (2006). Marital adjustment in families of young children with disabilities: Associations with daily hassles and problem-focused coping. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 111, 1–14.
27.
TracyS. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 837–851.
28.
WeisnerT. S. (1984). Ecocultural niches of middle childhood: A cross-cultural perspective. In CollinsW. A. (Ed.), Development during middle childhood: The years from six to twelve (pp. 335–369). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
29.
WeisnerT. S.MathesonC.CootsJ.BernheimerL. P. (2005). Sustainability of daily routines as a family outcome. In MaynardA.MartiniM. (Eds.), The psychology of learning in cultural context (pp. 41–73). New York, NY: Kluwer.
