Students with severe disabilities often experience limited social participation and few friendships at school. We describe a project to equip school teams to implement peer support arrangements and peer networks focused on friendships, inclusion, and learning. We adopted a phenomenological qualitative approach to learn how participants viewed these interventions within their schools, issues emerging during implementation, and the impact of these interventions. We discuss themes surrounding (a) the impact of the context and structure of the school on implementation, (b) participants’ views on professional development related to these interventions, and (c) impact on students, peers, and the broader school community.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2015). Efficacy of teachers training paraprofessionals to implement peer support arrangements. Exceptional Children, 82, 354–371. doi:10.1177/0014402915585564
2.
BrooksB. A.FloydF.RobinsD. L.ChanW. Y. (2015). Extracurricular activities and the development of social skills in children with intellectual and specific learning disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 59, 678–687. doi:10.1111/jir.12171
3.
BrownL.BranstonM.Hamre-NietupskiS.JohnsonF.WilcoxB.GruenewaldL. (1979). A rationale for comprehensive longitudinal interactions between severely handicapped students and nonhandicapped students and other citizens. AAESPH Review, 4, 3–14.
CarterE. W.AsmusJ.MossC. K.AmiraultK. A.BiggsE. E.BoltD.. . . WierK. (2015). Randomized evaluation of peer support arrangements to support the inclusion of high school students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 82, 209–233. doi:10.1177/0014402915598780
6.
CarterE. W.AsmusJ.MossC. K.CooneyM.WeirK.VincentL.. . . FespermanE. (2013). Peer network strategies to foster social connections among adolescents with and without severe disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46, 51–59. doi:10.1177/004005991304600206
7.
CarterE. W.Bottema-BeutelK.BrockM. E. (2014). Social interactions and friendships. In AgranM.BrownF.HughesC.QuirkC.RyndakD. (Eds.), Equity and full participation for individuals with severe disabilities: A vision for the future (pp. 197–216). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
8.
CarterE. W.CushingL. S.ClarkN. M.KennedyC. H. (2005). Effects of peer support interventions on students’ access to the general curriculum and social interactions. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30, 15–25. doi:10.2511/rpsd.30.1.15
9.
CarterE. W.CushingL. S.KennedyC. H. (2009). Peer support strategies for improving all students’ social lives and learning. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
10.
CarterE. W.KennedyC. H. (2006). Promoting access to the general curriculum using peer support strategies. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 31, 284–292. doi:10.1177/154079690603100402
11.
CarterE. W.MossC. K.HoffmanA.ChungY.SiscoL. G. (2011). Efficacy and social validity of peer support arrangements for adolescents with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 78, 107–125. doi:10.1177/001440291107800107
12.
CarterE. W.SiscoL. G.MelekogluM. A.KurkowskiC. (2007). Peer supports as an alternative to individually assigned paraprofessionals in inclusive high school classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 32, 213–227. doi:10.2511/rpsd.32.4.213
13.
CarterE. W.SwedeenB.KurkowskiC. (2008). Friendship matters: Fostering social relationships in secondary schools. TASH Connections, 34(6), 9–14.
14.
CopelandS. R.HughesC.CarterE. W.GuthC.PresleyJ.WilliamsC. R.. . . FowlerS. E. (2004). Increasing access to general education: Perspectives of participants in a high school peer support program. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 342–352. doi:10.1177/07419325040250060201
15.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
16.
CushingL. S.KennedyC. H. (1997). Academic effects of providing peer support in general education classrooms on students without disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 139–151.
17.
Del ValleJ. F.BravoA.LopezM. (2010). Parents and peers as providers of support in adolescents’ social network: A developmental perspective. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 16–27. doi:10.1002/jcop.20348
18.
FentyN. S.MillerM. A.LampiA. (2008). Embed social skills instruction in inclusive settings. Intervention in School & Clinic, 43, 186–192. doi:10.1177/1053451207312922
19.
GardnerK.CarterE. W.GustafsonJ. R.HochmanJ. M.HarveyM. N.MullinsT. S.. . . FanH. (2014). Effects of peer networks on the social interactions of high school students with autism spectrum disorders. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 39, 100–118. doi:10.1177/1540796914544550
20.
HanK. G.ChadseyJ. G. (2004). The influence of gender patterns and grade level on friendship expectations of middle school students toward peers with severe disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19, 205–214. doi:10.1177/10883576040190040201
21.
HochmanJ. M.CarterE. W.Bottema-BeutelK.HarveyM. N.GustafsonJ. R. (2015). Efficacy of peer networks to increase social connections among high school students with and without autism. Exceptional Children, 82, 96–116. doi:10.1177/0014402915585482
22.
Human Development Institute. (2015). Kentucky Peer Support Network Project. Retrieved from www.kypeersupport.org
23.
KempC.CarterM. (2002). The social skills and social status of mainstreamed students with intellectual disabilities. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 22, 391–411. doi:10.1080/0144341022000003097
24.
KleinertH.MiracleS.Sheppard-JonesK. (2007a). Including students with moderate and severe intellectual disabilities in school extracurricular and community recreation activities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 46–55. doi:10.1352/1934-9556(2007)45[46:ISWMAS]2.0.CO;2
25.
KleinertH.MiracleS.Sheppard-JonesK. (2007b). Including students with moderate and severe disabilities in extracurricular and community recreation activities: Steps to success!Teaching Exceptional Children, 39, 33–38.
26.
KramerJ. M.OlsenS.MermelsteinM.BalcellsA.LiljenquistK. (2012). Youth with disabilities’ perspectives of the environment and participation: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38, 763–777. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2012.01365.x
27.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
28.
LindsayS.McPhersonA.AslamH.McKeeverP.WrightV. (2013). Exploring children’s perceptions of two school-based social inclusion programs: A pilot study. Child & Youth Care Forum, 42, 1–18. doi:10.1007/s10566-012-9183-9
29.
LindsayS.McPhersonA. C. (2012). Strategies for improving disability awareness and social inclusion of children and young people with cerebral palsy. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38, 809–816. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01308.x
30.
LittleL. M.SiderisJ.AusderauK.BaranekG. T. (2014). Activity participation among children with autism spectrum disorder. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, 177–185. doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2460-3
31.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
Shokoohi-YektaM.HendricksonJ. M. (2010). Friendships with peers with severe disabilities: American and Iranian secondary students’ ideas about being a friend. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 23–37.
33.
SimeonssonR. J.CarlsonD.HuntingtonG. S.McMillenJ. S.BrentJ. L. (2001). Students with disabilities: A national survey of participation in school activities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23, 49–63. doi:10.1080/096382801750058134
34.
SymesW.HumphreyN. (2010). Peer-group indicators of social inclusion among pupils with autistic spectrum disorders (ASD) in mainstream secondary schools: A comparative study. School Psychology International, 31, 478–494. doi:10.1177/0143034310382496
35.
TodresL. (2005). Clarifying the life-world: Descriptive phenomenology. In HollowayI. (Ed.), Qualitative research in health care (pp. 104–124). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
36.
WagnerM.CadwalladerT. W.GarzaN.CametoR. (2004). Social activities of youth with disabilities. NLTS2 Data Brief, 3(1), 31–34.
37.
WhitehurstT.HowellsA. (2006). “When something is different people fear it”: Children’s perceptions of an arts-based inclusion project. Support for Learning: British Journal of Learning Support, 21, 40–44. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9604.2006.00399.x
