Instructional leaders must be proficient in their knowledge of effective instructional strategies in order foster an environment that uses what has been identified as “best-practice” for students with disabilities. This role is critical in rural school systems where principals take on more responsibility and the ability to employ highly qualified educators is often more difficult. The purpose of this multiple case study was to provide a detailed description of principals' understanding of effective instruction for students with disabilities in a rural mid-Atlantic school system. Results from three cases indicated that principals have a limited understanding of what effective instruction for students with disabilities encompasses and how to ensure its application.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonK. D. (2008). Transformational teacher leadership in rural schools.Rural Educator, 29(3), 8–17.
2.
AngelleP., & BiltonL. M. (2009). Confronting the unknown: Principal preparation training in issues related to special education.AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 5(4), 5–9.
3.
AshtonB., & DuncanH. E. (2012). A beginning rural principal's toolkit: A guide for success.Rural Educator, 41(1), 19–32.
4.
BarnettC., & Monda-AmayaL. E. (1998). Principals' knowledge of and attitudes toward inclusion.Remedial and Special Education, 19(3), 181–192.
5.
BerryA. B, PetrinR. A., GravelleM. L., & FarmerT. W. (2001). Issues in special education teacher recruitment, retention, and professional development: Considerations in supporting rural teachers.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 30(4), 3–11.
6.
BillingsleyB. S. (2005). Cultivating and keeping committed special education teachers: What principals and district leaders can do.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
7.
BoscardinM. L. (2005). The administrative role in transforming secondary schools to support inclusive evidence-based practices.American Secondary Education, 33, 21–32.
8.
BowersC. T. (2009). Effectiveness of inclusion in an Indiana middle school (Doctoral dissertation). Walden University.
9.
BrownK. M., & AnfaraV. A. (2002). From the desk of the middle school principal: Leadership responsive to the needs of young adolescents.Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, Inc.
10.
Brown-FerrignoT. & AllenL. W. (2006). Preparing principals for high-need rural schools: A central office perspective about collaborative efforts to transform school leadership.Journal of Research in Rural Education, 21(1), 1–16.
11.
BurnsM. K., & YsseldykeJ. E. (2009). Reported prevalence of evidence-based instructional practices in special education. Journal of Special Education, 43(1), 3–11.
12.
CoonerD., TochtermanS., & Garrison-WadeD. (2005). Preparing principals for leadership in special education: Applying ISLLC standards. NASSP document. Retrieved from http://www.nassp.org/Portals/0/Content/49135.pdf
13.
CourtadeG. R., ServilioK., LudlowB. L., & AndersonK. (2010). Highly qualified teacher requirements for special educators: Perceptions of West Virginia stakeholders.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 29(3), 37–49.
14.
CrayM., & MillenE. M. (2010). Rural superintendents' perceptions of principal preparation.Rural Educator, 31(3), 30–37.
15.
CruzeiroP. A., & MorganR. L. (2006). The rural principal's role with consideration for special education. Education, 126(3), 569–579.
16.
DavidsonD. N., & AlgozzineB. (2002). Administrators' perceptions of special education law.Journal of Special Education Leadership, 15(2), 43–48.
17.
DiPaolaM., Tschannen-MoranM., & Walther-ThomasC. (2004). School principals and special education: Creating the context for academic success.Focus on Exceptional Children, 37(1), 1–10.
18.
DiPaolaM., & Walther-ThomasC. (2003). Principals and special education: The critical role of school leaders (COPPSE document no. Ib-7). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education.
19.
EmeryL. (2009). Academic achievement of middle school students with specific learning disabilities in inclusive cotaught classes (Doctoral dissertation). Walden Universtiy.
20.
FlickU. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
21.
FlyvbjergB. (2011). Case study. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 301–316). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publicaitons.
22.
FurneyK. S., AikenJ., HasaziS., & Clark/KeefeK. (2005). Meeting the needs of all students: Contributions of effective school leaders.Journal of School Leadership, 15(5), 546–570.
23.
Garrison-WadeD., SobelD., & FulmerC. L. (2007). Inclusive leadership: Preparing principals for the role that awaits them.Educational Leadership & Administration, 19, 117–132.
24.
GeorgeP. S. (2001). The evolution of middle schools.Educational Leadership, 58(4), 40–45.
25.
GerringJ. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HallT., StrangmanN., & MeyerA. (2003). Differentiated instruction and implications for udl implementation. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum.
27.
HarmonH. L., & SchafftK. (2009). Rural school leadership for collaborative community development.The Rural Educator, 30(3), 4–9.
LaskyB., & KargeB. D. (2006). Meeting the needs of students with disabilities: Experience and confidence of principals.NASSP Bulletin, 90(1)19–36.
30.
LeithwoodK., LouisK. S., AndersonS., & WahlstromK. (2004). How leadership influences student learning.New York, NY: Wallace Foundation.
31.
LynchJ. M. (2012). Responsibilities of today's principal: Implications for principal preparation programs and principal certification policies.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31(2), 40–47.
32.
McHattonP. A., BoyerN. R., ShaunessyE., & TerryP. M. (2010). Principals' perceptions of preparation and practice in gifted and special education content: Are we doing enough?Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 5(1), 1–22.
33.
MillsB. D. (1974). A survey of the elementary school principalship in West Virginia (Doctoral dissertation).West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
34.
MollenkopfD. L. (2009). Creating highly qualified teachers: Maximizing university resources to provide professional development in rural areas.The Rural Educator, 30(3), 34–39.
35.
Murtadha-WattsK., & StoughtonE. (2004). Critical cultural knowledge in special education: Reshaping the responsiveness of school leaders.Focus on Exceptional Children, 37(2), 1–8.
36.
NorS. M., PihieZ. L., & AliS. (2008). Instructional leadership practices of rural school principals.International Journal of Learning, 15(7), 231–238.
37.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
38.
PattersonJ., MarshallC., & BowlingD. (2000). Are principals prepared to manage special education dilemmas?NASSP Bulletin, 84(613), 9–20.
39.
PraisnerC. L. (2003). Attitudes of elementary school principals toward the inclusion of students with disabilities.Exceptional Children, 69(2), 135–145.
40.
RascoeP. A. (2007). An analysis of Virginia's high school principals educational background, knowledge and perceptions related to special education (Doctoral dissertation). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
41.
ReaP. J., McLaughlinV. L., & Walther-ThomasC. (2002). Outcomes for students with learning disabilities in inclusive and pullout programs.Exceptional Children, 68(2), 203–222.
42.
RitterS. J. (2013). An examination of how principals lead instructional change in rural high schools (Doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO.
43.
SantoliS. P., SachsJ., RomeyE. A., & McClurgS. (2008). A successful formula for middle school inclusion: Collaboration, time, and administrative support.Research in Middle Level Education, 32(2), 1–13.
44.
ScholzR. W., & TietjeO. (2002). Embedded case study methods: Integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
45.
StakeR. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
46.
SupovitzJ., SirinidesP., & MayH. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning.Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31–56.
47.
TaylorJ., StecherB., O'DayJ., NaftelS., & Le FlochK. C. (2010). State and local implementation of the “No Child Left Behind Act”. Volume IX–accountability under “NCLB”: Final report. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
48.
TownsellR. (2007). Human resource management in small rural districts: The adminstrator's role in recruitment, hiring, and staff development.National Forum of Applied Educational Resaerch Journal, 20(3), 1–9.
49.
UrbanW. J., & WagonerJ. L. (2009). American education: A history (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics (2011a). The nation's report card: Mathematics 2011.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
52.
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics (2011b). The nation's report card: Reading 2011.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
53.
WagnerM., NewmanL., CametoR., & LevineP. (2006). The academic achievement and functional performance of youth with disabilities.A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2006_07/nlts2_report_2006_07_complete.pdf.
54.
WallinD., & NewtonP. (2013). Instructional leadership of the rural teaching principal: Double the trouble or twice the fun?International Studies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration & Management [CCEAM]), 41(2), 19–31.
55.
WarnerR. J. (2009). A comparison of teaching models that promote academic achievement in an inclusive secondary classroom (Doctoral dissertation). Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX.
56.
WigleS. E., & WilcoxD. J. (1999). The special education competencies of general education administrators.Reading Improvement, 36(1), 4–15.
57.
WoodJ. N., FinchK., & MireckiR. M. (2013). If we get you, how can we keep you? Problems with recruiting and retaining rural administrators.Rural Educator, 34(2), 12-14
58.
YinR. K. (2009). Cast study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
59.
YoungsP., KwakH. S., & PogodzinskiB. (2015). How middle school principals can affect beginning teachers' experiences.Journal of School Leadership, 25(1), 157–189.
