This paper provides a summary of the design, development, and evaluation of a mobile distance supervision system for teacher interns in their field-based teaching experiences. Developed as part of the University of Florida's Restructuring and Improving Teacher Education 325T grant project, the prototype system streams video of teachers in rural classrooms using iPad Minis equipped with a variety of peripheral devices to provide enhanced optics and multi-source audio. A description of the prototype, including hardware and software components, is provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BillingsleyB., GriffinC. C., SmithS. J., KammanM., & IsraelM. (2009). A review of teacher induction in special education: Research, practice, and technology solutions. NCIIP Document Number RS-1. National Center to Inform Policy and Practice in Special Education Professional Development.
2.
BoltonM. (2010). Fly on the wall: Using teleconferencing to supervise student teacher performance.Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 14 (1), 62–76.
BrownellM. T., BishopA. M., & SindelarP. T. (2005). NCLB and the demand for highly qualified teachers: Challenges and solutions for rural schools.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24(1), 9–15.
EppleyK. (2009). Rural schools and the highly qualified teacher provision of No Child Left Behind: A critical policy analysis.Journal of Research in Rural Education, 24, 1–11.
7.
GronnD., RomeoG., McNamaraS., TeoY. H., GronnD., RomeoG., … TeoY. H. (2013). Web conferencing of pre-service teachers' practicum in remote schools.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 21 (2), 247–271.
8.
HagerK. D., BairdC. M., & SpriggsA. D. (2012). Remote teacher observation at the University of Kentucky.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31 (4), 3–8.
9.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
10.
JonesT. S., & RicheyR. C. (2000). Rapid prototyping methodology in action: A developmental study.Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 63–80. doi: 10.1007/BF02313401
11.
KellyL., & BishopJ. (2013). Remote video supervision in adapted physical education.Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 84(1), 26–29. doi: 10.10 80/07303084.2013.744945
12.
McAdamsC. R., & WyattK. L. (2010). The regulation of technology-assisted distance counseling and supervision in the United States: An analysis of current extent, trends, and implications.Counselor Education and Supervision, 49(3), 179–192.
13.
RockM., GreggM., GableR., ZigmondN., BlanksB., HowardP., & BullockL. (2012). Time after time online: An extended study of virtual coaching during distant clinical practice.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277–304.
14.
RockM., GreggM., TheadB. K., AckerS. E., GableR. A., & ZigmondN. P. (2009). Can you hear me now? Evaluation of an online wireless technology to provide real-time feedback to special education teachers-in-training.Teacher Education and Special Education, 32(1), 64–82.
15.
RoutierW., & Otis-WilbornA. (2013). Supervision in distance education: Technology for reflecting, evaluating and learning in teacher education. In World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2013, pp. 2251–2256. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/112285
