The purpose of this study was to determine if differences existed across rural, urban, and suburban environments when special education teachers reported perceived levels of student and parent involvement and participation during IEP meetings. The investigators surveyed special education teachers (N = 159) across a Southwest state and applied log linear analyses to show possible differences in groups. Special education teachers in rural environments reported significantly higher rates of parent and student involvement and participation in IEP meetings than their counterparts in urban and suburban environments. Results are discussed and suggestions and implications for practitioners are provided.
BardJ., GardenerC., & WielandR. (2006). Rural school consolidation: History, research, summary, conclusions, and recommendations.The Rural Educator, 27(2), 40–48.
2.
BennettM. L., ShaddochA. J., & BennettA. J. (1992). Teachers' perceptions of individualized education plans.Australian Journal of Remedial Education, 23(1), 25–28.
3.
BerryA. B. (2012). The relationship of perceived support to satisfaction and commitment for special education teachers in rural areas.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31(1), 3–14.
4.
BerryA. B., PetrinR. A., GravelleM. L., & FarmerT. W. (2011). Issues in special education teacher recruitment, retention, and professional development: Considerations in supporting rural teachers.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 30(4), 3–11.
5.
BoylanC. R. (2004). The state of rural education in pre-service teacher education courses. In BoylanC. & HemmingsB. (Eds.), WA District High School Administrators' Association and Society for the Provision in Rural Australia (pp. 85–93). Fremantle, WA: Society for the Provision of Education in Rural Australia.
6.
BrownellM., AdamsA., SindelarP., WaldronN., & VanhoverS. (2006). Learning from collaboration: The role of teacher qualities.Exceptional Children, 72(2), 169–185.
7.
CarlsonE., ChenL., & SchrollK. (2002). SpeNSE: Study of personnel needs in special education.Final report of the paperwork substudy (pp. 1–33. Washington, DC: Special Education Programs (ED/OSERS).
8.
CaspeM., LopezM. E., & WolosC. (2007). Family involvement in elementary school children's education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project. Available at www.hfrp.html
9.
ClarkS. G. (2000). The IEP process as a tool for collaboration.Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(2), 55–66.
10.
CollinsT. (1999). Attracting and retaining teachers in rural areas. Charleston, WV: Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. EDO-RC-99-7).
11.
CottonK. (1996). Affective and social benefits of small-scale schooling. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction service No. ED401088)
12.
D'AmicoJ., MatthesW., SankarA., MerchantB., & ZuritaM. (1996). Young voices from the rural Midwest.Journal of Research in Rural Education, 12, 142–149.
13.
D'AmicoJ., & NelsonV. (2000). How on earth did you hear about us? A study of exemplary rural school practices in the upper Midwest.Journal of Research in Rural Education, 16(3), 182–192.
14.
Darling-HammondL., & Baratz-SnowdenJ. (Eds.) (2005). A good teacher in every classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
GallagherJ., & DesimoreL. (1995). Lessons learned from implementation of the IEP: Applications to the IFSP.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15(3), 353–378.
18.
GoodmanL.A. (1961). Snowball sampling.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148–170.
19.
GuskeyT. (2002). Professional development and teacher change.Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381–391.
20.
HardreP. L. (2010). Examining rural high school teacher characteristics and motivating strategies.Teacher Education and Practice, 23(2), 226–252.
21.
HardreP. L., CrowsonH. M., DebackerT. K., & WhiteD. (2007). Predicting the academic motivation of rural high school students.The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(4), 247–270.
22.
HardreP. L., & SullivanD. (2008). Teachers' perceptions and individual differences: How they influence teachers' motivating strategies.Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2059–2075.
23.
HopkinsT. M. (2005). If you are poor, it is better to be rural: A study of mathematics achievement in Tennessee.The Rural Educator, 27(1), 21–28.
24.
HowleyC., & BickelR. (1999). The Matthew project: National report (RC 022 082). Randolph, VT.: Rural Challenge Policy Program. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED433174).
25.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) of 2004, 20 United States Congress1412 (a) (5), Pub. L. No. 108-466.
26.
Irinaga-BistolasC., SchalockM., MarvinR., & BeckL. (2007). Bridges to success: A developmental induction model for rural early career special educators.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 26(1), 13–22.
27.
JohnsonJ., & StrangeM. (2009). Why rural matters opportunities: State and rural challenges and opportunities.A Report of the Rural School and Community Trust Policy Program. Retrieved from http://files.ruraledu.org/wrm09.pdf
28.
KhattriN., RileyK. W., & KaneM. B. (1997). Students at risk in poor, rural areas: A review of the research.Journal of Research in Rural Education, 13(2), 79–100.
29.
LehmannJ. P., BassettD. S. & SandsD. J. (1999). Students' participation in transition-related actions: A qualitative study.Remedial and Special Education, 20(3) 160–169.
30.
LeonardL. & LeonardP. (2003, September 17). The continuing trouble with collaboration: Teachers talk.Current Issues in Education [On-line], 6(15). Available: http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume6/number15/
31.
LevinsonE. M. & PalmerE. J. (2005). Preparing students with disabilities for school-to-work transition and postschool life.Principal Leadership, 5(8), 11–15.
32.
LysonT.A. (2002). What does a school mean to a community? Assessing the social and economic benefits of schools to rural villages in New York.Journal of Rural Research in Education, 17(3), 131–137.
MartinJ. E., Van DyckeJ. L., GreeneB.A., GardnerJ.E., ChristensenW. R., & WoodsL.L. (2006). Direct observation of teacher-directed IEP meetings: Establishing the need for student IEP meeting instruction.Exceptional Children, 72, 187–200.
35.
MenloveR. R., HudsonP. J., & SuterD. (2001). A field of IEP dreams: Increasing general teacher participation in the IEP development process.Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(5), 28–33.
36.
MuellerT. G. (2009). IEP facilitation: A promising approach to resolving conflicts between families and schools.TEACHING Exceptional Children, 41(3), 60–67.
Office of Management and Budget (2000). Standards for defining metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; Notice.Federal Register, 65(249).
39.
PenningtonR., HornC., & BerrongA. (2009). An evaluation of the differences between big city and small town special education services for students with low incidence disabilities in Kentucky.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28(4), 3–9.
40.
PeshkinA. (1978). Growing up American: Schooling and the survival of community. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
41.
PowersL. E., TurnerA., WestwoodD., MatuszewskiS., WilsonR. & PhillipsA. (2001). TAKE CHARGE for the Future: A controlled field-test of a model to promote student involvement in transition planning.Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 89–104.
42.
RainforthB., & York-BarrJ. (1997). Collaborative teams for students with severe disabilities: Integrating therapy and educational services. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
43.
RiceJ. (1992). Loglinear analysis: Analysis of categorical variables in the logit setting. In ThompsonB. (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology (Vol. 2, pp. 152). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
44.
RosenkoetterJ. D., IrwinJ. D., & SacedaR. G. (2004). Addressing personnel needs for rural areas.Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(3), 83–96.
45.
RudeH., JacksonL., CorreaS., LucknerF., MuirS., & FerrellK. (2005). Perceived needs of students with low-incidence disabilities in rural areas.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24(3), 3–14.
46.
ShaddockA. J. (2002). An unplanned journey into the individualized planning.International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 49(2), 191–200.
47.
SmithS. W. (1990). Individualized education programs (IEPs) in special education: From intent to acquiescence.Exceptional Children, 57, 6–14.
48.
StewartL. (2009). Achievement differences between large and small schools in Texas.The Rural Educator, 30(2), 20–28.
49.
StrangeM., JohnsonJ., ShowalterD., & KleinR. (2012). Why Rural Matters 2011–12: The condition of rural education in the 50 states. A Report of the Rural School and Community Trust Policy Program. Washington, DC.
50.
StroggilosV., & XanthacouY. (2006). Collaborative IEPs for the education of pupils with profound and multiple learning difficulties.European Journal of Special Needs Education, 21(3), 339–349.
51.
TestD.W., MasonC.HughesC., KonradM., NealeM., & WoodW.M. (2004). Student involvement in individualized education program meetings.Exceptional Children, 70(4), 391–412.
52.
ThompsonB. (2006). Some logistic models: Model fitting in a logistic context. In ThompsonB. (2006), Foundations of behavioral statistics (pp. 393 – 426). New York: Guilford.
WarinS. (1995). Implementing the code of practice: Individual education plans. Stoke-on-Trent, NASEN.
56.
WehmeyerM. L. (1996). Self-determination as an educational outcome: Why is it important to children, youth and adults with disabilities? In SandsD.J. & WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 17–36). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
57.
WehmeyerM.L., PalmerS.B., ShogrenK., Williams-DiehmK., SoukupJ. (2013). Establishing a causal relationship between interventions to promote self-determination and enhanced student self-determination.Journal of Special Education, 46(4), 195–210.
