The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of special education and general education teachers working together to develop and implement story-based lessons on the academic engaged time of students with moderate intellectual disability and autism. A multiple probe across participants' design was used to measure teacher implementation of steps of task analyses as well as student academic engaged time. Results of this study indicate special education teachers can follow a 12-step task analysis to adapt books for students with moderate intellectual disability and autism and that general education teachers can reliably implement a task analysis that incorporates an adapted book in their reading instruction for students with moderate intellectual disability and autism. Furthermore, this study provides evidence that may offer an effective way to increase engagement for students with moderate intellectual disability and autism in general education classrooms during literacy instruction.
Berry,A. B., Petrin,R. A., Gravelle,M. L., & Farmer,T. W. (2011). Issues in special education teacher recruitment, retention, and professional development: Considerations in supporting rural teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 30(4), 3-11.
2.
Browder,D., Gibbs,S., Ahlgrim-Delzell,L., Courtade,G. R., Mraz,M., & Flowers,C. (2009). Literacy for students with severe disabilities: What should we teach and what should we hope to achieve?Remedial and Special Education, 30, 269-282.
3.
Browder,D. M., Mims,P. J., Spooner,F., Ahlgrim-Delzell,L., & Lee,A. (2009). Teaching elementary students with multiple disabilities to participate in shared stories. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33(1-2), 3-12.
4.
Browder,D. M., & Spooner,F. (2006). Teaching language arts, math and science to students with severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Company.
5.
Browder,D. M., Trela,K., & Jimenez,B. (2007). Training teachers to follow a task analysis to engage middle school students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities in grade-appropriate literature. Focus On Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 206-219.
6.
Data Accountability Center (2010). Table 2.2: Number and percentage of students ages 6 through 21 served under IDEA, Part B, by educational environment and state: Fall 2008. Retrieved from https://www.ideadata.org/arc_toc10.asp#partbLRE
7.
Downing,J. E., & Peckham-Hardin,K. (2007). Supporting inclusive education for students with severe disabilities in rural areas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 26(2), 10-15.
8.
Erickson,K. A., & Koppenhaver,D. A. (1995). Developing a literacy program for children with severe disabilities. Reading Teacher, 48, 676-684.
9.
Houghton Mifflin Reading K-6 (2005). New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
10.
Hudson,M. E., & Test,D. W. (2011). Evaluating the evidence base of shared story reading to promote literacy for students with extensive support needs. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(1-2), 34-35.
11.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, PL 101-476, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq.
12.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, PL 108-466, 20 U. S. C. §1400, H. R. 1350.
13.
Jameson,J. M., McDonnell,J., Polychronis,S., Riesen,T., & Taylor,S. J. (2008). Embedded, constant time delay instruction by peers without disabilities in general education classrooms. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 346-363.
14.
Jimenez,B., & Kemmery,M. (2013). Story-based lessons for students with severe intellectual disability: Implications for research-to-practice. Education Matters, 1(1), 80-96.
15.
Johnson,J. W., McDonnell,J., Holzwarth,V. N., & Hunter,K. (2004). The efficacy of embedded instruction for students with developmental disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 214-227.
16.
Kliewer,C., & Landis,D. (1999). Individualizing literacy instruction for young children with moderate to severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 66, 85-100.
17.
Ludlow,B., Conner,D., & Schechter,J. (2005). Low incidence disabilities and personnel preparation for rural areas: Current status and future trends. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24(3), 15-22.
18.
McDonnell,J., Mathot-Buckner,C., Thorson,N., & Fister,S. (2001). Supporting the inclusion of students with moderate and severe disabilities in junior high school general education classes: The effects of classwide peer tutoring, multielement curriculum, and accommodations. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 141-160.
19.
McDonnell,J., Thorson,N., McQuivey,C., & Kiefer-O'Donnell,R. (1997). Academic engaged time of students with low-incidence disabilities in general education classes. Mental Retardation, 35(1), 18-26.
20.
Mims,P. J., Browder,D. M., Baker,J. N., Lee,A., & Spooner,F. (2009). Increasing comprehension of students with significant intellectual disabilities and visual impairments during shared stories. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 409-420.
21.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110.
22.
Rossenkoetter,S. E., Irwin,J. D., & Saceda,R. G. (2004). Addressing personnel needs for rural areas. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 276-291.
23.
Ryndak,D. L., Morrison,A. P., & Sommersein,L. (1999). Literacy before and after inclusion in general education settings: A case study. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 5-22.
