This investigation used an ABAB withdrawal design to determine the effect of self-monitoring using the MotivAider® (MotivAider, 2000) on percentage of intervals of on-task behavior by an 11-year old male with a moderate intellectual disability who attended a rural middle school. The MotivAider® is a small device, the size of a pager, which can be programmed to vibrate on a variable or fixed interval schedule. The student used the MotivAider® as a tactile prompt to self-record the presence or absence of on-task behavior at 3-min time intervals while completing math assignments independently in a resource setting. During 15-min sessions, the student completed a math assignment requiring computation skills for one- and two-digit addition and subtraction facts. The investigators used a pretest-posttest measure to examine the effects of the self-monitoring intervention on the student's math fluency before and after intervention. To enhance social validity, the instructional assistant implemented the intervention and the design of the investigation supported and monitored the student's Individualized Education Program goals for math computation and self-sufficiency. Results of this investigation demonstrated (a) an increased percentage of time on-task during self-monitoring intervention, (b) the ability of the student to accurately self-monitor his on-task behavior, and (c) a 100% increase in math fluency from the pretest to posttest. Implications of these findings and directions for future research are discussed.
Agran,M., Cavin,M., Wehmeyer,M., & Palmer,S. (2006). Participation of students with moderate to severe disabilities in the general curriculum: The effects of the self-determined learning model of instruction. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 230-241.
2.
Agran,M., Sinclair,T., Alper,S., Cavin,M., Wehmyer,M., & Hughes,C. (2005). Using self-monitoring to increase following-direction skills of students with moderate to severe disabilities in general education. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40(1), 3-13.
3.
Amato-Zech,N. A., Hoff,K. E., & Doepke,K. J. (2006). Increasing on-task behavior in the classroom: Extension of self-monitoring strategies. Psychology in the Schools, 43(2), 211-221. doi: 10.1002/pits.20137
4.
Beicastro,F. P. (2004). Rural gifted students who are deaf or hard of hearing: How electronic technology can help. American Annals of the Deaf, 149, 309-313.
5.
Broer,S. M., Doyle,M. B., & Giangreco,M. F. (2005). Perspectives of students with intellectual disabilities about their experiences with paraprofessional support. Exceptional Children, 71, 415-430.
6.
Carr,S. C., & Punzo,R. P. (1993). The effects of self-monitoring of academic accuracy and productivity on the performance of students with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 18, 241-250.
7.
Cooper,J. O., Heron,T. E., & Heward,W. L. (2007). Applied Behavior Analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle Ridge, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
8.
Dalton,T., Martella,R. C., & Marchand-Martella,N. E. (1999). The effects of a self-management program in reducing off-task behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 9, 157-176.
9.
Flaute,A. J., Peterson,S. M., Van Norman,R. K., Riffle,T., & Eakins,A. (2005). Motivate me! 20 tips for using a MotivAider®for improving your classroom. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 2(2) Article 3. Retrieved from http://habitchange.com/docn/tecarticle.pdf
10.
Gettinger,M., & Ball,C. (2008). Best practices in increasing academic engaged time. In ThomasA. & GrimesJ. (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology V (p. 1043-1058). Bethesda, MD: NASP Publications.
11.
Giangreco,M. F. (2010). One-to-one paraprofessionals for students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms: Is conventional wisdom wrong?Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48(1), 1-13. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-48.1.1
12.
Giangreco,M. F., Broer,S. M., & Suter,J. C. (2011). Guidelines to selecting alternatives to overreliance on paraprofessionals: Field-testing in inclusion-oriented schools. Remedial and Special Education, 32(1), 22-38. doi: 10.1177/0741932509355951
13.
Giangreco,M. F., Edelman,S. W., Broer,S. M., & Doyle,M. (2001). Paraprofessional support of students with disabilities: Literature from the past decade. Exceptional Children, 68(1), 45-64.
14.
Giangreco,M. F., Edelman,S. W., Luiselli,T. E., & McFarland,S. Z. (1997). Helping or hovering? Effects of instructional assistant proximity on students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64(1), 7-18.
15.
Graham-Day,K. J., Gardner,R., & Hsin,Y. (2010). Increasing on-task behavior of high school students with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Is it enough?Education and Treatment of Children, 33, 205-221.
16.
Harris,K. R., Friedlander,B., Saddler,B., Frizzelle,R., & Graham,S. (2005). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of academic performance: Effects among students with ADHD in the general education classroom. Journal of Special Education, 39(3), 145-156.
17.
Holifield,C., Goodman,J., Hazelkorn,M., & Heflin,L. J. (2010). Using self-monitoring to increase attending to task and academic accuracy in children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25, 230-238. doi: 10.1177/1088357610380137
18.
Hughes,C., Copeland,S. R., Agran,M., Wehmeyer,M. L., & Rodi,M. S. (2002). Using self-monitoring to improve performance in general education high school classes. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 262-272.
19.
Keramidas,C. G., & Collins,B. C. (2009). Assistive technology use with birth to three population: A rural perspective. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28, 38-48.
20.
Lee,S., Palmer,S. B., & Wehmeyer,M. L. (2009). Goal setting and self-monitoring for students with disabilities: Practical tips and ideas for teachers. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(3), 139-145. doi: 10.1177/1053451208326053
21.
Legge,D. B., DeBar,R. M., & Alber-Morgan,S. R. (2010). The effects of self-monitoring with a MotivAider® on the on-task behavior of fifth and sixth graders with autism and other disabilities. Journal of Behavior Assessment and Intervention in Children, 1(1), 43-52.
22.
McDougall,D., & Brady,M. P. (1998). Initiating and fading self-management interventions to increase math fluency in general education classes. Exceptional Children, 64(2), 151-166.
23.
MotivAider® (2000). Thief River Falls, MA: Behavioral Dynamics.
Prater,M. A., Joy,R., Chilman,B., Temple,J., & Miller,S. R. (1991). Self-monitoring of on-task behavior by adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14 (3), 164-177.
26.
Puckett,K. S. (2004). Project ACCESS: Field testing an assistive technology toolkit for students with mild disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19 (2), 5-17.
27.
Shinn,M. R. (2008). Best practices in using curriculum-based measurement in a problem-solving model. In ThomasA. & GrimesJ. (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology V (p. 243-261). Bethesda, MD: The National Association of School Psychologists.
28.
Sparrow,S. S., Cicchetti,D. V., & Balla,D. A. (2005). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
29.
Strain,P. S., Kohler,F. W., Storey,K., & Danko,C. D. (1994). Teaching preschoolers with autism to self-monitor their social interactions: An analysis of results in home and school settings. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 2(2), 78-88. doi: 10.1177/106342669400200202
30.
Wechsler,D. (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
31.
Wehmeyer,M. L., Agran,M., & Hughes,C. (2000). A national survey of teachers' promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. The Journal of Special Education, 34(2), 58-68.
32.
Wood,S. J., Murdock,J. Y., Cronin,M. E., Dawson,N. M., & Kirby,P. C. (1998). Effects of self-monitoring on on-task behaviors of at-risk middle school students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 263-279.
