In a technological society, demands for higher literacy are ever increasing, creating grievous consequences for those who fail to meet these demands (National Research Council, 1998). Both legislative mandates, such as NCLB, and developments in the provision of reading instruction, such as RtI, have increased the demand for high quality tutoring services. However, the U.S. Department of Education (USDOE, 2005) and state officials (Richard, 2005) report that access to intensive supplemental tutoring may be limited in rural areas due to limited availability of qualified providers. One way to overcome this obstacle is to supplement classroom instruction with live systematic, comprehensive, and explicit online reading tutoring. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe and discuss a preliminary investigation of the effects of live online reading tutoring on 4th grade students in a high minority, high poverty school in Philadelphia, PA. Although this study was not conducted in a rural location, the implications are great for rural schools where qualified tutors may be nonexistent or inaccessible. Using a distance teleconferencing system, trained and supervised undergraduate students located at Utah State University delivered tutoring. The researchers employed a multiple-baseline across participants design to determine, the effects of 1:1 online reading tutoring on reading fluency scores for 3 students. In addition, they compared data on tutors' face-to-face and online tutoring behaviors. Data collected from parents, teachers, tutees, and tutors evaluating the effectiveness, efficiency, and feasibility of online tutoring for remediating students' skill deficiencies are presented and discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams,G.L., & Engelmann,S. (1996). Research on Direct Instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.
2.
American Federation of Teachers (AFT). (1999). Building one the best, learning from what works: Five Promising remedial reading intervention programs. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Barker,S., Gersten,R., & Keating,T. (2000). When less may be more: A 2-year longitudinal evaluation of a volunteer tutoring program requiring minimal training.Reading Research Quarterly, 35(4), 494-519.
4.
Bernard,R.M., Abrami,P.C., Lou,Y., Borokhovski,E., Wade,A., Wozney,L., Wallet,P.A., Fiset,M., & Huang,B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature.Review of Educational Research, 74, 379-439.
5.
Beth-Marom,R., Saporta,K., & Caspi,A. (2005). Synchronous vs. asynchronous tutorials: Factors affecting students' preferences and choices.Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 245-262.
6.
Blackman,B. (1996). Preventing early reading failure. In CramerS. C. & EllisW. (Eds.), Learning disability: Lifelong issues (pp. 113-118). Baltimore, MD: Paul C. Brookes.
7.
Blackman,B. (1997). Early intervention and phonological awareness: A cautionary tale. In Blackman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 347-379). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Campbell,J.R., Hombo,C.M., & Mazzeo,J. (2000). NAEP 1999 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
10.
Campbell,M.L. (1988). Corrective Reading program evaluated with secondary students in San Diego.ADI News, 7(4), 15-17.
11.
Catts,H.W., Fey,M.E., Tomblin,J.B., & Zhang,X. (2002). A longitudinal investigation of reading outcomes in children with language impairments.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,45, 1142-1157.
12.
Collins,B.C., & Galyon Keramidas,C. (2006). Planning and delivering online instruction. In LudlowB. L., CollinsB. C., & MenloveR.R. (Eds.), Online instruction for distance education delivery: Preparing special educators in and for rural areas. Victoria, BC: Trafford.
13.
Delquadri,J.C., Greenwood,C.R., Stretton,K., & Hall,R.V. (1983). The peer tutoring spelling game: A classroom procedure for increasing opportunity to respond and spelling performance.Education and Treatment of Children, 6, 225-239.
14.
Engelmann,S., Carnine,L., Johnson,G. (1999). Corrective reading decoding level A: Word attack basics. Columbus, OH: Science Research Associates (SRA).
Felton,R.H. (1993). Effects of instruction on the decoding skills of children with phonological-processing problems.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 583-589.
18.
Fletcher,J.M., & Lyon,G.R. (1998). Reading: A research-based approach. In EversW. M. (Ed.), What's wrong in America's classrooms? (pp. 49-90). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
19.
Forbush,D.E., Stenhoff,D. M., Vasquez,E., Furzland,M., & Alexander,M. (2007). Evaluation of an online tool for assessing competence in achievement testing.Teacher Education and Special Education,30(3), 142-154.
20.
Good,R.H., Simmons,D.C., & Kame'enui,E. J. (2001). The importance of decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high states outcomes.Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 257-288.
21.
Greenwood,C. R., Carta,J. J. & Kamps,D. (1990). Teacher-mediated versus peer-mediated instruction: A review of educational advantages and disadvantages. In FootH. C., MorganM. M., & ShuteR.H. (Eds.), Children helping children (pp. 177-205). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
22.
Greenwood,C.R., Delquadri,J.C., & Hall,R.V. (1989). Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring.Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 151-160.
23.
Greenwood,C.R., Dinwiddie,G., Bailey,V., Carta,J.J., Dorsey,D., Kohler,F., Nelson,C., Rotholz,D., & Schulte,D. (1987). Field replication of classwide peer tutoring.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 521-538.
24.
Gregory,R.P., Hackney,C., & Gregory,N.M. (1982) Corrective reading programme: An evaluation.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52(1), 33-50.
25.
Haisley,F.B., Tell,C.A., & Andrews,J.A. (1981). Peers as tutors in the mainstream: Trained “teachers” of handicapped adolescents.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 224-226.
Johnson,D.W., & Johnson,R.T. (1984). The effects of intergroup cooperation and intergroup competition on ingroup and outgroup cross-handicap relationships.The Journal of Social Psychology, 124, 85-94.
Lyon,G.R. (2001). Measuring success: Using assessments and accountability to raise student achievement. Subcommittee on education reform committee on education and the workforce U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC [Online]. Available: http://www.nrrf.org/lyon_statement3-01.htm
31.
Maheady,L., & Harper,G. (1987). A classwide peer tutoring program to improve the spelling test performance of low-income, third- and fourth-grade students. Education and Treatment of Children, 14, 177-189.
32.
Marchand-Martella,N. E., Blakely,M., & Schaefer,E. (2004). Aspects of schoolwide implementations. In Marchand-MartellaN. E., SlocumT.A., & MartellaR.C. (Eds.), Introduction to direct instruction (pp. 304-334). Boston, MA: Pearson/ Allyn & Bacon.
33.
Meyer,K.A. (2002). Quality in distance education: Focus on on-line learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2007). The nation's report card. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
35.
National Reading Panel (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy.
36.
National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
37.
Nelson,J.R., Johnson,A., & Marchand-Martella,N. (1996). Effects of direct instruction, cooperative learning and independent learning practices on the classroom behavior of students with behavioral disorders: A comparative analysis.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders,4, 53-62.
38.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002)
39.
Odom,S.L., Brantlinger,E., Gersten,R., Horner,R.H., Thompson,B., & Harris,K.R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices.Exceptional Children, 71(2), 137-148.
40.
Richard,A. (2005). Supplemental help can be hard to find for rural students.Education Week, 25(14), 1-3.
41.
Schacter,J. (1999). Reading programs that work: A review of programs for pre-kindergarten to 4th grade. [Online]. Available: http://www.mff.org/pubs/ME279.pdf
42.
Snow,C., Burns,S., & Griffen,P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Stein,M., & Kinder,D. (2004). Reading. In Marchand-MartellaN. E., SlocumT. A., & MartellaR.C. (Eds.), Introduction to direct instruction (pp. 100-139). Boston, MD: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
45.
Thomson,B. (1992). A field report: Specific learning disabilities Corrective Reading pilot study 1989-90.ADI News,11(2), 11-13.
46.
Thorne,M.T. (1978). Payment for reading: The use of the corrective reading scheme' with junior maladjusted boys.Remedial Education,13(2), 87-90.
47.
Torgesen,J.K. (1997). The prevention and remediation of reading disabilities: Evaluating what we know from research.Journal of Academic Language Therapy, 1, 11-47.
48.
United States Department of Education. (2005) Supplemental educational services non-regulatory guidance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
49.
Watkins,C.L., & Slocum,T.A. (2004). The components of Direct Instruction. In Marchand-MartellaN. E., SlocumT. A., & MartellaR.C. (Eds.), Introduction to direct instruction (pp. 28-65). Boston, MA: Pearson/ Allyn & Bacon.
