Federal law mandates that all teachers, including special educators, must be highly qualified by meeting standards for licensure in the academic content areas they teach. This provision has an impact on prospective and practicing teachers, on schools and school systems, and on colleges and universities, especially those in rural areas. This study surveyed special education teachers, school administrators, and faculty members in a rural state to identify their perspectives on the benefits and drawbacks of the highly qualified teacher requirement and its effect on the field of special education. The results reveal that stakeholders' perceptions of the impact of the highly qualified teacher requirements are positive as well as negative and reflect both their respective roles in special education and the rural contexts in which they work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BillingsleyB. S. (2004). Special education teacher retention and attrition: A critical analysis of the research literature.The Journal of Special Education, 38, 39-55.
2.
BoeE. E., & CookL. H. (2006). The chronic and increasing shortage of fully certified teachers in special and general education.Exceptional Children, 72, 443-460.
3.
BoeE., ShinS., & CookL. (2007). Does teacher preparation matter for beginning teachers in either special or general education?The Journal of Special Education, 41, 158-170.
4.
BoeE. E., Cook,L M., & SunderlandR. J. (2008). Teacher turnover, examining exit attrition, teaching area transfer, and school migration.Exceptional Children, 75, 7-31.
5.
BrownellM. T. (2009). Reconsidering the preparation of special education teachers: Why a background in general and special education is necessary. Retrieved from http://www.cec.sped.org
6.
BrownellM. T., BishopA. M., & SindelarP. T. (2005). NCLB and the demand for highly qualified teachers: Challenges and solutions for rural schools.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24(1), 9-15.
7.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2009). Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2008-2009 edition. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/oco
8.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010). Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2010-2011 edition. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/oco
9.
CarlsonE. S. (2001). SPeNSE.OSEP briefing on the study of personnel needs in special education. Retrieved from http://www.spense.org/results.html
Council for Exceptional Children. (n.d.). Passion vs. compulsion: National board certification and federal “highly qualified” teacher mandates. Retrieved from http://www.cec.sped.org
12.
Darling-HammondL., & SykesG. (2003). Wanted: A national teacher supply policy for education: The right way to meet the “highly qualified teacher” challenge.Education Policy Analysis Archives, 17(33). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n33/v11n33.pdf
HirschE., FreitasC., ChurchK., & VilarA. (2009). West Virginia's vision for improving teaching and learning: Creating supportive environments for student success. Santa Cruz, CA: New Teacher Center, University of California at Santa Cruz. Retrieved from http://www.westvirginiavital.org/library/attachments/WV_VITALfinalreport.pdf
20.
IngersollR. (2003). Out-of-field teaching and the limits of teacher policy. Seattle: Center for the study of teaching and policy, University of Washington.
21.
IngersollR. (2005). The problem of under qualified teachers: A sociological perspective.Sociology of Education, 78(2), 175-178.
22.
JimersonL. (2003). Special challenges of the “No Child Left Behind” Act for rural schools and districts. Washington, DC: The Rural School and Community Trust. Retrieved from http://www.ruraledu.org/publications.html#research
23.
King-SearsM. (2005). Are you highly qualified? The plight of effective special educators for students with learning disabilities.Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(3), 187.
24.
KossarK., MitchemK., & LudlowB. (2005). No Child Left Behind: A national study of its impact on special education in rural schools.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24(1), 3-8.
25.
LudlowB. (Ed). (2005). Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24(4).
26.
McLeskeyJ., TylerN., & FlippinS. (2004). The supply and demand of special education teachers: A review of research regarding the chronic shortage of special education teachers.The Journal of Special Education, 38(1), 5-21.
27.
MitchemK., KossarK., & LudlowB. L. (2006). Finite resources, increasing demands: Rural children left behind? Educators speak out on issues facing rural special education.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 25(3), 13-23.
National Education Association. (n.d.). NEA position on ‘highly qualified effective teacher’ mandate. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/home/18018.htm
33.
PurcellL., EastB., & RudeH. (2005). Administrative perspectives on the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) for students with disabilities in rural settings.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24(1), 27-31.
34.
ReeseS. (2004). The highly qualified teacher under NCLB.Techniques, 79(8), 33-35.
35.
RoellkeC., & King RiceJ. (2008). Responding to teacher quality and accountability mandates: The perceptive of school administrators and classroom teahcers.Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7(1), 264-295.
36.
Rural Policy Research Institute (RUPRI). (2006, June). Demographic and economic profile: West Virginia. Columbia, MO: Author. Retrieved from http://www.rupri.org/Forms/WestVirginia.pdf
37.
Rural School and Community Trust. (2009). Why rural matters 2009: State and regional challenges and opportunities. Retrieved from http://files.ruraledu.org/wrm09/WRM09.pdf
38.
SafierK. L., (2007). Improving teacher quality in Ohio: The limitations of the highly qualified teacher provision of the no child left behind act of 2001.Journal of Law & Education, 36(1), 65-87.
39.
SkrticT. H. (2005). Special education: Policy and practice. Denver: Love Publishing Company.
United States Government Accountability Office. (2004). No Child Left Behind Act: Additional assistance and research on effective strategies would help small rural districts. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04909.pdf
42.
WayneA. M., & YoungsP. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review.Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89-122.
