Reinforcing and facilitating learning communities is a strategy that has been used to decrease attrition rates in traditional campus-based programs, and it has been hypothesized that applying principles of learning communities in distance education programs could have similar positive outcomes. To facilitate the development and maintenance of regional learning communities within the Mild/Moderate Distance Degree and Licensure Program at Utah State University, highly successful graduates of the program are employed as mentors within each broadcast locality to engineer regional opportunities for studying and socialization. Program evaluation respondents indicate that mentoring experiences were very helpful as they progressed through the courses and practica. Moreover, graduation rates increased from 53% to 75% since the inception of this approach.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndradeM. S. (2008). Learning communities: Examining positive outcomes.Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 9(1), 1-20.
2.
BradfordP., PorcielloM., BalkonN., & BachusD. (2007). The Blackboard learning system: The be all and end all in educational instruction?Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(3), 301-314.
3.
BraunT. (2008). Making a choice: The perceptions and attitudes of online graduate students.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(1), 63-93.
4.
BrownellM. T., BishopA. M., & SindelarP. T. (2005). NCLB and the demand for highly qualified teachers: Challenges and solutions for rural schools.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24(1), 9-15.
5.
BuchK., & SpauldingS. (2008). A longitudinal assessment of an initial cohort in a psychology learning community.Teaching of Psychology, 35(3), 189-193.
6.
CarmelA., & GoldS. S. (2007). The effects of course delivery modality on student satisfaction and retention and GPA in onsite vs. hybrid courses. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED496527).
7.
CarrS. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students.Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(23), A39.
8.
CollinsM. P., & BergeZ. L. (1998). Using web-conferencing with primary interactive television courses. Proceeding of the 14th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, Madison, WI. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. 422849).
9.
ConradD. (2002). Deep in the hearts of learners: Insights into the nature of online community.Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 1-19.
10.
CoxG., CarrT., & HallM. (2004). Evaluating the use of synchronous communication in two blended courses.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3), 183-193.
DeNeuiD. L., & DodgeT. L. (2006). Asynchronous learning networks and student outcomes: The utility of online learning components in hybrid courses.Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33(4), 256-259.
13.
DiRamioD. & WolvertonM. (2006). Integrating learning communities and distance education: Possibility or pipedream?Innovative Higher Education, 31(2), 99-113.
14.
EverhartR. L. (1999). Creating Virtual Communities.Syllabus, 12(8), 12-16.
15.
FosterA. (2007). Professor avatar: In the digital universe of second life, classroom instruction also takes on a new personality.Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(4), 24.
16.
KatsiyannisA., ZhangD., & ConroyM. A. (2003). Availability of special education teachers: Trends and tests.Remedial and Special Education, 24(4), 246-53.
17.
LudlowB.L. & BrannonS.A. (1999). Distance education programs preparing personnel for rural areas: Current practices, emerging trends, and future practices.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 18(3), 5-20.
18.
MenloveR., & Lignugaris/KraftB. (2004). Preparing rural distance education preservice teachers to succeed.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 23(2), 18-26.
19.
McSporranM. & YoungS. (2002). Community Building: Facilitating Successful Online Courses. E-learn-2002, Oct 15-19. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. 478591).
20.
MisanchukM. & AndersonT. (2001). Building community in an online learning environment: Communication, cooperation and collaboration. Proceedings of the Annual Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference, Murfreesboro, TN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED463-725).
21.
MorrisL. V., & FinneganC. L. (2008). Best practices in predicting and encouraging student persistence and achievement online.Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 10(1), 55-64.
22.
MotteramG. & ForresterG. (2005). Becoming and online distance learner: What can be learned from students' experiences of induction to distance programmes?Distance Education, 26(3), 281-298.
23.
ParsadB. & LewisL. (2008). Distance education at postsecondary institutions: 2006-7. First Look.National Center for Education Statistics. 2009-044. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED503770).
24.
RiffellS. K., & SibleyD. F. (2004). Can hybrid course formats increase attendance in undergraduate environmental science courses?Journal of Natural Resources and Life Science Education, 33, 16-20.
25.
RovaiA. P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks.Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319-332.
26.
SchrumL., BurbankM. D., & CappsR. (2007). Preparing future teachers for diverse schools in an online learning community: Perceptions and practice.Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 204-211.
27.
ShapiroN. (1998). Learning communities: Moving beyond classroom walls.Metropolitan Universities: An International Forum, 9(1), 25-34.
28.
ShenR., WangM., & PanX. (2008). Increasing interactivity in blended classrooms through a cutting-edge mobile learning system.British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 1073-1086.
29.
Smith CanterL. L., VoyteckiK. S., & RodriguezD. (2007). Increasing online interaction in rural special education teacher preparation programs.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 26, 23-27.
30.
SmithS. B., SmithS. J., & BooneR. (2000). Increasing access to teacher preparation: The effectiveness of traditional instructional methods in an online learning environment.Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(2), 37-46.
31.
SpoonerF., JordanL, AlgozzineB., & SpoonerM. (1999). Student ratings of instruction in distance learning and on-campus classes.Journal of Educational Research, 92(3), 132-140.
32.
SpoonerF., SpoonerM., AlgozzineB., & JordanL. (1998). Distance education and special education: Promises, practices, and potential pitfalls.Teacher Education and Special Education, 14, 121-131.
33.
SteinwegS. B., DavisM. L., & ThomsonW. S. (2005). A comparison of traditional and online instruction in an introduction to special education course.Teacher Education and Special Education, 28(1), 62-73.
34.
SundeenT. H., & WienkeW. D. (2009). A model for recruiting and preparing new rural special educators: Mining an untapped potential.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28, 3-10.
35.
TengT., & TaverasM. (2004). Combining live video and audio broadcasting, synchronous chat, and asynchronous open forum discussions in distance education.Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 33(2), 121-129.
36.
WilliamsJ. M., MartinS. M., & HessR. K. (2002). Personnel preparation and service delivery issues in rural areas: The state of the art.Rural and Special Education Quarterly, 21(4), 3-11.
37.
YudkoE., HirokawaR., & ChiR. (2008). Attitudes, beliefs, and attendance in a hybrid class.Computers & Education, 50(4), 1217-1227.
