This review summarizes field studies of responsiveness to intervention (RTI) models. Eleven studies were located that met inclusion criteria. Studies were classified as either district/state implemented or researcher implemented. Outcomes demonstrated improved academic performance and a slight overall decrease in special education referral and placement rates. These findings must be met with some reservation however due to research designs and procedures used in the studies. Implications for rural special education and directions for future research are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
*Ardoin,S. P., Witt,J. C., Connell,J. E., & Koenig,J. L. (2005). Application of a three-tiered response to intervention model for instructional planning, decision making, and the identification of children in need of services.Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 362-380.
2.
Billingsley,B.S. (2004). Special education teacher retention and attrition: A critical analysis of the research literature.The Journal of Special Education, 38, 39-55.
3.
*Bollman,K. A., Silberglitt,B., & Gibbons,K. A. (2007). The St. Croix River education district model: Incorporating systems-level organization and a multi-tiered problem-solving process for intervention delivery. In JimersonS. R., BurnsM. K., & VanDerHeydenA. M. (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 319-330). New York: Springer.
4.
Bowen,S.K. & Rude,H. A. (2006). Assessment and students with disabilities: Issues and challenges with educational reform.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 25, 24-30.
5.
BrownellM., Bishop,A. & Sindelar,P. (2005). NCLB and the demand for high quality teachers: Challenges and solutions for rural schools.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24, 9-15.
6.
Burns,M.K., Appleton,J. J., & Stehouwer,J. D. (2005). Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention: Examining field-based and research-implemented models.Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 381-394.
7.
*Callender,W.A. (2007). The Idaho results-based model: Implementing response to intervention statewide. In JimersonS. R., BurnsM. K., & VanDerHeydenA. M. (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention:The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 331-342). New York: Springer.
8.
Division for Learning Disabilities. (2007). Thinking about response to intervention and learning disabilities: A teacher's guide.Arlington, VA: Author.
9.
Farmer,T.W., Leung,M.-C., Banks,J. B., Schaefer,V., Andrews,B, & Murray,R. A. (2006). Adequate yearly progress in small rural schools and rural low-income schools.Rural Educator, 1-7.
10.
Farmer,T.W., Vernon-Feagans,L., & Hannum,W. H. (2008). Educational issues in diverse rural communities: The research agenda of the National Research Center on Rural Education Support. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Fuchs,D., & Deshler,D.D. (2007). What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn't be afraid to ask).Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 129-136.
13.
Fuchs,D., & Fuchs,L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93-99.
14.
Fuchs,D., Fuchs,L. S., & Compton,D. L. (2004). Identifying reading disabilities by responsiveness-to-instruction: Specifying measures and criteria.Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 216-227.
15.
Fuchs,D., Mock,D., Morgan,P.L., & Young,C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157-171.
16.
Fuchs,D., & Young,C. L. (2006). On the irrelevance of intelligence in predicting responsiveness to reading instruction.Exceptional Children, 73, 8-30.
17.
Gehrke,R.S. & McCoy,K. (2007). Considering the context: Differences between the environments of beginning special educators who stay and those who leave.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 26, 32-40.
18.
Gersten,R., Keating,T., Yovanoff,P., & Harniss,M. (2001). Working in special education: Factors that enhance special educators' intent to stay.Exceptional Children, 67, 549-567.
19.
Ikeda,M.J., Tilly,W. D.III, Stumme,J., Volmer,L., & Allison,R. (1996). Agency-wide implementation of problem solving consultation: Foundations, current implementation, and future directions.School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 228-243. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
20.
*Kovaleski,J. F., Tickling,E. E., Morrow,H., & Swank,H. (1999). High versus low implementation of instructional support teams: A case for maintaining program fidelity.Remedial and Special Education, 20, 170-183.
21.
Lemke,J.C. (1995). Attracting and retaining special educators in rural and small schools: Issues and solutions.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 14, 25-30.
22.
Marston,D., Muyskens,P., Lau,M., & Canter,A. (2003). Problem-solving model for decision making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 187-200.
23.
Miller,D.M., Brownell,M. T., Smith,S. W. (1999). Factors that predict teachers staying in, leaving of transferring from the special education classroom.Exceptional Children, 65, 201-218.
24.
Monk,D.H. (2007) Recruiting and retaining high-quality teachers in rural areas. The Future of Children, 17, 155 – 174.
25.
National Joint Commission on Learning Disabilities (2005). Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities.Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 249-260.
26.
*O'Connor,R.E., Harty,K.R., & Fulmer,D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in kindergarten through third grade.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 532-538.
27.
*Peterson,D. W., Prasse,D. P., Shinn,M. R., Swerdlik,M. E. (2007). The Illinois flexible service delivery model: A problem-solving model initiative. In JimersonS. R., BurnsM. K., & VanDerHeydenA. M. (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 300-318). New York: Springer.
28.
Rosenkoetter,S., Irwin,J., & Saceda,R. (2004). Addressing personnel needs for rural areas.Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 276-291.
29.
Rural School and Community Trust (2007). Why rural matters 2007: The facts about rural education in the 50 states. Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://www.ruraledu.org/whyruralmatters/.
Shadish,W.R., Cook,T. D., & Campbell,D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference.Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
32.
*Telzrow,C. F., McNamara,K., & Hollinger,C. L. (2000). Fidelity of problem-solving implementation and relationship to student performance.School Psychology Review, 29, 443-461.
33.
*Torgesen,J. K., Alexander,A. W., Wagner,R. K., Rashotte,C. A., Voeller,K., & Conway,T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33-58.
34.
*VanDerHeyden,A. M., Witt,J. C., & Gilbertson,D. (2007). A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a response to intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education.Journal of School Psychology, 45, 225-256.
35.
*Vaughn,S., Linan-Thompson,S., & Hickman,P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities.Exceptional Children, 69, 391-409.
36.
Vellutino,F.R., Scanlon,D. M., Sipay,E. R., Small,S. G., Chen,R., Pratt,A., & Denckla,M. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experimental deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability.Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
