Scientifically Based Research and Students with Severe Disabilities: Where do Educators Find Evidence-Based Practices?

Abstract

No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requires that all teachers use scientifically based research (SBR) in their classrooms. Teachers are referred to the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC), which has developed standards to review and rate research to identify evidence-based practices. This article defines SBR under NCLB, summarizes current evidence standards, provides questions to help educators identify SBR and evidence-based practices, discusses the implications of evidence-based practices for rural schools, and briefly discusses why students with severe disabilities need to be included in SBR. It seems that the methodologies preferred by the WWC to determine if a practice is scientifically based are problematic for educators of students with severe disabilities, and even more so for small schools in rural communities.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Algozzine,

(2003). Scientifically based research: Who let the dogs out? Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28 (3), 156–160.

Browder,

D. M.

& Cooper-Duffy,

(2003). Evidenced-based practices for students with severe disabilities and the requirement for accountability in “No Child Left Behind”. The Journal of Special Education, 37 (3), 157–163.

Hardman,

M. L.

(2003). Put me in coach: A commentary on the RPSD exchange. Research and Practice for persons with Severe Disabilities, 28 (3), 153–155.

Hardman,

& Mulder,

(2004). Federal education reform: Critical issues in public education and their impact on students with disabilities. Quality Personnel Preparation in Emotional/Behavioral Disorders: Current Perspectives and Future Directions, 12–35.

Horner,

R. D.

, Carr,

E. G.

, Halle,

, McGee,

, Odom,

, & Wolery,

(2004). The use of single subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71 (2), 165–179.

Lewis,

T. J.

, Hudson,

, Richter,

, & Johnson,

(2004). Scientifically supported practices in emotional and behavioral disorders: A proposed approach and brief review of current practices. Behavioral Disorders, 29 (3), 247–259.

McDonnell,

& O'Neill,

(2003). A perspective on single/within subject research methods and “scientifically based research.” Research and Practice for Persons with severe Disabilities, 28 (3), 138–142.

Odom,

S. L.

, Brantlinger,

, Gersten,

, Horner,

R. D.

, Thompson,

, & Harris,

(2004). Quality indicators for research in special education and guidelines for evidence-based practices: Executive summary. Division for Research, Council for Exceptional Children, 1–11.

Pettersson,

, Mootz,

, & Anderson,

(2004). Clearing the air for education research: The devil is in the details. The Utah Special Educator, 25 (1), 20–21.

10.

Simpson,

R. L.

(2004). Another look at critical issues in public education and their impact on students with disabilities: A response to Hardman and Mulder. Quality Personnel Preparation in Emotional/Behavioral Disorders: Current Perspectives and Future Directions, 44–50.

11.

Smith,

(2003). Scientifically based research and evidence-based education: A federal policy context. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28 (3), 126–132.

12.

U.S. Department of Education. (2002). No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Retrieved September 22, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/edpicks.jhtml

13.

U.S. Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences. (n.d.). What Works Clearinghouse: A trusted source of scientific evidence of what works in education. Retrieved October 5, 2004, from http://www.w-w-c.org

14.

Viadero,

Debra.

(2004). ‘What Works' Research Site Unveiled. Education Week. Retrieved November 10, 2004, from http://www.w-w-c.org/info/edweek_article.pdf

15.

Watkins,

C. L.

& Slocum,

T. A.

(2004). The components of direct instruction. In Marchand-Martella,

N. E.

, Slocum,

T. A.

, & Martella,

R. C.

(Eds.), Introduction to Direct Instruction (pp. 29–65). Boston: Pearson.