Teacher shortages in special education have been a source of longstanding concern for professionals and parents involved in the education of students with disabilities. Because of their geographic location, culture, and lack of resources, rural administrators have always struggled to staff their schools with qualified special education teachers. No Child Left Behind and its definition of highly qualified teacher present new challenges to rural district administrators attempting to secure adequate numbers of special education teachers. In this paper, we outline the challenges rural administrators face in reducing special education teacher shortages, present strategies being used nationally and regionally to reduce strategies, and critique those strategies. We conclude our paper by advocating for a more comprehensive approach to solving teacher supply and demand problems, one that is driven by personnel data.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Becker,G. (1975). Human capital (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
2.
Benner,A. D. (2000). The cost of teacher turnover. Austin: Texas Center for Educational Research.
3.
Boe,E. (2004). [Table 1. Shortage of highly-qualified teachers instructing self-contained classes in four core academic areas by first, second, and third teaching assignments]. Unpublished raw data.
4.
Boyd,D.Hamilton,L., Loeb,S., & Wyckoff,J. (2003). The draw of home: How teachers' preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools. Working Paper 9953. Cambridge. MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
5.
Brownell,M. T., Sindelar,P. T., Bishop,A. G., Langley,L. K., & Seo,S.(2002). Special education teacher supply and teacher quality: The problems, the solutions.Focus on Exceptional Children, 35, 1–16.
6.
Carlson,E., & Billingsley,B. S.(2001, July). Working conditions in special education: Current research and implications for the field. Paper presented at OSEP Project Director's Conference: Washington, D. C.
7.
Clewell,B., & Villegas,A.(2001) Absence unexcused: Ending teacher shortages in high need schools.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
8.
Collins,T. (1999). Attracting and retaining teachers in rural areas. Retrieved October 2004, from Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools, ERIC Digest website: http://www.ael.org/page.htm?&pv=x&pd=abo6721&id=396
9.
Darling-Hammond,L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
Hanushek,E. A., Kain,J. F., & Rivkin,S. G.(2004a). The revolving door: Factors affecting teacher turnover. In Fowler,W.J.Jr. (Ed.), Developments in school finance: 2003. Fiscal proceedings from the annual state data conference of July2003 (pp. 7–15). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
12.
Hanushek,E. A., Kain,J. F., & Rivkin,S. G.(2004b). Why public schools lose teachers.The Journal of Human Resources, 39, 326–354.
Hirsch,E. (2004). NCLB teaching quality mandates findings and themes from the field.Teacher Quality in the Southeast: Best practices and policies, (3)1–3.
15.
Hirsch,E., Koppich,J. E., & Knapp,M. S.(2001). Revising what states are doing to improve the quality of teaching: An update on patterns and trends. Seattle: University of Washing, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. Retrieved August 2002, from http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/pdfs/states-hkk-02-2001.pdf
16.
Jimerson,L., (n. d.) Special challenges of the “No Child Left Behind” Act for rural schools and districts. The Rural School and Community Trust Washington, D.C. Retrieved on November 2004 from www.ruraledu.org/docs/nclb/jimerson.pdf
17.
Ludlow,B. L. (1998) Preparing Special Education Personell For Rural Schools: Current Practices and Future Directions. Journal of Resarch in Rural Education. 14(2), 57–75.
18.
McLeskey,J., Tyler,N. C., & Flippin,S. S. (2004). The supply of and demand for special education teachers: A review of research regarding the chronic shortage of special education teachers.The Journal of Special Education, 38(1), 5–21.
19.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (2003, January). No dream denied: A pledge to America's children.Washington, D. C.: Author.
North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (n.d.). Implementing the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for rural schools and districts. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory: Naperville, IL. Retrieved on November 2004 from http://www.ncrel.org/policy/pubs/html/implicate/challenge.htm
23.
Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory (2003). Challenges and opportunities of NCLB for small, rural, and isolated schools.Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved October 2004, from www.nwrel.org/planning/reports/nclb/nclb.pdf
24.
Pecheone,R. (2002, July). Developing a performance-based licensure system. Paper presented at the National Council of State Legislators/National Governors Association seminar, San Francisco, CA.
25.
Pogodzinski,J. M. (2002) The teacher shortage: Cause and recommendations for change. San Jose, CA: California Senate Office of Research.
26.
Prince,C. (2002) Higher pay is hard-to-staff schools: The case for financial incentives. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
27.
Reeves,C. (2002) Implementing the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for rural schools and districts, Napersville, IL North Central Regional.
28.
Rosenkoetter,S. E., Irwin,J.D., & Saceda,R. G.(2004)Addressing personnel needs for rural areas. Teacher Education and Special Education,27(3), 276–291.
29.
Ryan,S. (1999). Alaska's rural early intervention preservice training program.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 18(3/4), 21–28.
30.
Schwartzbeck,T. T., & Prince,C. D.(2003). How are rural districts meeting the teacher quality requirements of No Child Left Behind. Charleston, VA: Appalachia Educational Laboratory. Retrieved October 2004, from http://www.ael.org/snaps/aasa-aelreport4.pdf
31.
Sindelar,P. T., Rennells,M. S., Daunic,A., Austrich,C., & Eisele,M.(1999). Systematic evaluation of alternative routes to teaching competence: Project SEART-C final report. Gainesville, FL: Center for School Improvement (Technical Rep. No. 10).
Southeast Center for Teaching Quality (2003). Recruitment and retention in a regional and national context. Chapel Hill, NC: Southeast Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved November 2004, from http://www.teachingquality.org/policyhtss.htm
35.
Smith,T. M., & Ingersoll,R. M.(2004, April). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
36.
Turnbull,R., Turnbull,A., Shanks,M., Smith,S., & Leal,D.(2002). Exceptional lives: Special education in today's schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
37.
Tyler,N.C., Cantou-Clarke,C.D., Easterling,J., & Klepper,T.(2003). Recruitment and Retention and Special Education Teacher Preparation In Rural Areas: Diversity, Federal Funding, and Technical Assistance Consideration.Rural Special Education Quaterly22(3)3–12.
38.
United States Department of Education (2002). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Data. Available at www.ideadata.org.
39.
United States Department of Education (1998). Special education teachers: National trends and demand and shortage (Section III, pp. 1–23). In USDOE (Ed), Twentieth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Washington, DC: Author.
40.
University of Washington, Center for The Study of Teaching Policy (October, 2004). Teacher Turnover, Teacher Shortages, and The Organization of Schools. Retrieved on December 11, 2004, from The Center for The Study of Teaching Policy Web Site: http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/Turnover-Ing-01-2001.pdf
41.
Westling,D.L., & Whitten,T. M.(1996). Rural special education teachers' plans to continue or leave their teaching position.Exceptional Children, 62(4), 319–335.
