Desktop Videoconferencing: Examples of Applications to Support Teacher Training in Rural Areas

Abstract

This article presents examples of desktop videoconferencing used as a tool for supporting teacher training, particularly in rural settings. The accessibility of videoconferencing desktop systems makes it possible to directly observe and supervise students in actual teaching situations. Videoconferencing presents unique opportunities for working with students in rural settings, as well as other students with limited access to university programs. The benefits and challenges of using desktop videoconferencing are discussed. The discussion section addresses the need for additional research to determine the appropriate application of desktop videoconferencing systems as the technology becomes more available for school use.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Binner,

(1998). The perceived benefits and limitations of using two-way conferencing technology to supervise pre-service teachers in a remote teacher training program. Unpublished master's thesis, Utah State University, Logan.

Clawson,

B. N.

, & Weaver,

A. M.

(1993). Two-way, interactive a/v applied to the supervision of student teachers. T.H.E. Journal, 6, 67–69.

Collins,

B.C.

, Schuster,

J.W.

, & Grisham-Brown,

(1999). So you're a distance learner? Tips and suggestions for rural special education personnel involved. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 18, 3/4,66–72.

Day,

J. N.

, & Sebastian,

J. P.

(2002). Preparing vision specialists at a distance: A qualitative study on computer-enhanced learning. Journal of Visual impairment & Blindness, 96(11), 796–808.

Fetterman,

D. M.

(1996). Videoconferencing on-line: Enhancing communication over the Internet. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 23–27.

Heimbecker,

, Minner,

, & Prater,

(2000). Canadian and American community based Native teacher education programs: A personal perspective. In Reyher

(Ed.), Learn in beauty: Indigenous education for a new century (pp. 35–44). Flagstaff: Northern Arizona University.

Ludlow,

B. L.

, & Duff,

M. C.

(2001). Guidelines for selecting telecommunications technologies for distance education. In Ludlow

& Spooner

(Eds). Distance education applications in teacher education in special education (pp. 33) Arlington, VA: Teacher Education Division Council for Exceptional Children.

Ludlow,

B.L.

, Foshay,

J.D.

, Brannan,

S.A.

, Duff,

M.C.

, & Dennison,

K.E.

(2002). Updating knowledge and skills of practitioners in rural areas: A web-based model. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 21(2), 33–44.

Spooner,

, Spooner,

, Algozzine,

, & Jordan,

(1998). Distance education and special education: Promises, practices, and potential pitfalls. Teacher Education and Special Education, 21, 121–131.

10.

Van Horn,

(1999). The electronic classroom and videoconferencing. Phi Delta Kappan, 80 (5), 111–112.

11.

Westling,

D. L.

, & Whitten,

T. M.

(1996). Rural special education teachers' plans to continue or leave their teaching positions. Exceptional Children, 62 (4), 319–335.

12.

Willis,

B.D.

(1992). Effective distance education: A primer for faculty and administrators. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Statewide, Distance Education.