Learning Disabilities or Difference: A Critical Look at Issues Associated with the Misidentification and Placement of Hispanic Students in Special Education Programs
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2003
Learning Disabilities or Difference: A Critical Look at Issues Associated with the Misidentification and Placement of Hispanic Students in Special Education Programs
A new generation of Hispanic students are at risk due to inadequacies in our educational system. The inadequacies which include lack of prepared teachers and misuse of testing and assessment procedures impact special education programs, in particular, when one examines practices relative to Latino students in the area of learning disabilities. The article addresses problems in the definition of learning disabilities, learner variability, and the effects of race, poverty, culture, and language on educational outcomes. The authors call for a new assessment paradigm that would require the restructuring of professional development programs and institutional practices in public schools that are not in line with current research on topics related to this population including second language acquisition and cognitive development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adelman,H. (1970). An interactive view of causality. Academic Therapy, 6, 43–52.
2.
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (1994). Teacher education pipeline III:: Schools, colleges, and departments of education enrollments by race, ethnicity and gender.Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
3.
Arnold,M. L. (2000, May). Rural schools: Diverse needs call for flexible policies [policy brief]. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
4.
Artiles,A.J., Rueda,R., Salazar,J.J, & Higareda,I. (2002, November). Factors associated with English learner representation in special education in California Urban School Districts, 117–136. In LosenDaniel. J & OrfieldGary (Eds). Racial Inequity in Special Education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Baca,L. (2000, November). The status and future of bilingual education. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Multicultural Education, Orlando, FL.
6.
Baca,L., & Valenzuela,L. (1998). Background and rationale for bilingual special education. In CervantesL. (Ed.), The Bilingual Special Education Interface (pp. 2–25). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Baumeister,A. A., Kupstas,F., & Klindworth,J. M. (1990). The new morbidity: A national plan of action. In ThompsonT. & HuppS. C. (Eds.), Saving children at risk.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Bond,G., Tinker,M. A., & Wasson,B. B. (1979). Reading difficulties: Their diagnosis and correction (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10.
Bos,C. S., & Fletcher,T. V. (1997). Sociocultural considerations in learning disabilities research: Knowledge gaps and future directions. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,12 (2), 92–99.
11.
Bronfenbrenner,U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Collier,V. P. (1995). Promoting academic success for ESL students: Understanding second language acquisition for school.Elizabeth, NJ: NJTESOL-BE, Inc.
13.
Council of Economic Advisors. (1998, September). The President's initiative on race.Beacon Journal, p. AS.
14.
Cartes,C. (1999, May). The accelerating change of American diversity.The School Administrator, 12–14.
15.
Coutinho,Oswald, & Best. (2002). The influence of sociodemographics and gender on the disproportionate identification of minority students as having learning disabilities. Remedial & Special Education, 23(1), 49–60.
16.
Cummins,J. (2001). BICS and CALP. In ByramM. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching and learning. London: Rutledge.
17.
Cummins,J. (2000). Language power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire.Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
18.
Cummins,J. (1985). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy.San Diego: College Hill.
19.
Cushner,K., McClelland,A., & Safford,P. (2003). Human diversity in education: An integrative approach (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
20.
Darling Hammond,L. & McLaughlin,M.W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597–604.
21.
Darling-Hammond,L., & Post,L. (2000). Inequality in teaching and schooling: Supporting high quality teaching and leadership in low income school. In KahlenbergR. D. (Ed.), A nation at risk: Preserving Public Education as an Engine for Social Mobility (pp. 127–168). New York: Century Foundation Press.
22.
Dunn,L. (1968). Special Education for the mildly retarded: Is much of it justifiable? Exceptional Children, 35, 5–22.
23.
Fattah,Chaka. (2002). Racial inequity in special education. [Review of the book Racial inequity in special education.] Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Figueroa,R. A., & Ruiz,N. (1993). Bilingual pupils and special education: A reconceptualization. In ReavesR. C. & McLaughlinP. J. (Eds.), Recent Advances in Special Education and Rehabilitation (pp. 73–87). Boston: Andover Medical Publishers.
25.
Gersten,R., & Baker,S. (2000). What we know about effective instructional practices for English language learners. Exceptional Children, 66(4), 454–470.
26.
Harris,J. D., Gray,B. A., Davis,J. E., Zaremba,E. T., & Argulewicz,E. N. (1997). The exclusionary clause and the disadvantaged: Do we try to comply with the law? Journal of Learning Disabilities,21, 581–583.
27.
Harry,B., Klingner,J.K., Sturges,K.M., & Moore,R.F. (2002). Of rocks and soft places: Using qualitative methods to investigate disproportionality. In LosenD. J. & OrfieldG., (Eds.), Racial Inequity in Special Education (pp. 71–92). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
Harry,B. (1994). The disproportionate representation of minority student in special education: Theories and recommendations.Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
29.
Heller,KA., Holtzman,W.H., & Messick,S. (Eds.). (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
30.
Hill,R., Carjuzaa,J., Aramburo,D., & Baca,L. (1993). Culturally and linguistically diverse teachers in special education: Repairing or Redesigning the leaky pipeline? Teacher Education and Special Education, I6, 258–269.
31.
Horn,W. F., & Tynn,D. (2001). Time to make special education special again. In FinnC. & RothmanA. J. & CharlesJ.HokansonR. (Eds.), Rethinking Special Education for a New Century (pp. 23–51). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation and the Progressive Policy Institute.
32.
Hosp,J. & Reschly,D. (2003). Referral rates for intervention or assessment: A meta-analysis of racial differences. The Journal of Special Education,37 (2), 67–80.
33.
IDEA. (1997). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105–17 (1997)
34.
IDEA. (1990). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101–476 (1990)
35.
Kea,C.D., & Utley,C.A. (1998). To teach me is to know me. The Journal of Special Education, 32(1), 44–47.b
36.
Ladner,M. & Hamons,C. (2001). Special but unequal: Race and special education. In Rethinking special education for the 21st century.Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation and the Progressive Policy Institute.
37.
Lambert,M.C., Puig,M., Rowan,G.T., Lyubanslcy,M., & Winfrey,T. (1998). Adult perspectives on behavior and emotional problems in African American children. Manuscripted submitted for publication.
38.
Lau V. Nichols, 414 U.S.563 (1974).
39.
Losen,D. & OrfieldG. (Eds.). (2002). Racial inequity in special education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Lyon,R. (1996, Spring). Special education for students with disabilities.The Future of Children,6 (1), 1–6.
41.
Lyon,R., Fletcher,J., Shaywitz,S., Shaywitz,B., Torgeson,J., Wood,F., Schulte,A., & Olson,R. (2001). Rethinking learning disabilities. In FinnC. E. & RothmanA. J. & HokansonC. R. (Eds.), Rethinking Special Education for a New Century (pp. 259–287). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation and the Progressive Policy Institute.
42.
Maheady,L. (1985). The assessment of the bilingual exceptional child: Trends and models. In BacaL. & StarksJ. & HartleyE. (Eds.), Third annual symposium: Exceptional Hispanic children and youth (Vol. 1, pp. 41–63). Boulder, CO: Bueno Center for Multicultural Education.
43.
Mather,N., & Healey,W. C. (1990). Deposing aptitude-achievement discrepancy as the imperial criterion for learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal,1 (2), 41–48.
44.
McIntyre,T. (1992). A primer on cultural diversity for educators. Multicultural Forum,1 (1), 6 & 13.
45.
McLaughlin,M.J., Pullin,D. & Artiles,A.J. (2001). Challenges for special education in the 21” century: Rethinking culture in school reform. Journal of Special Education Leadership,14 (2), 51–62.
46.
Melnick,S., & Pullin,D. (2000, Sept/Oct). Can you take dictation? Prescribing teacher quality through testing.Journal of Teacher Education,51, 262–275.
47.
Moll,L. C., & Ruiz,R. (2002). The schooling of Latino children. In Suarez-OrozcoM. M. & PaezM. M. (Eds.), Latinos: Remaking America (pp. 362–374): Berkeley: University of California Press.
48.
National Research Council. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Ochoa,S. H., Rivera,B. D., & Powell,M. P. (1997). Factors used to comply with the exclusionary clause with bilingual and limited English-proficient pupils: Initial guidelines. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,12 (3), 161–167.
51.
Olsen,L. (1988). Crossing the schoolhouse border: Immigrant students and the California Public Schools. Boston: A California Tomorrow Policy Research Project. National Coalition of Advocates for Students.
52.
Ortiz,A., & Yates,J. (1983). Incidence of exceptionality among Hispanics: Implications for manpower planning. NABE Journal,7, 41–54.
53.
Ortiz,A., & & Yates,J. R. (2001). A framework for serving English language learners with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Leadership,14 (2), 72–80.
54.
Poplin,M. (1988). Holistic/constructivist principles of the teaching/learning process: Implications for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7(21); 401–416.
55.
President's Advisory Committee on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans. (September, 1996). Our Nation on the fault line: Hispanic American Education. A report to the President of the United States, the Nation, and the Secretary of Education, Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
56.
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. (1985). U.S.C., 20, 104 (Sec 794.34).
57.
Reschly,D. J. (October 1997). Disproportionate minority representation in general and special education: Patterns, issues, and alternatives. Des Moines: Iowa Department of Education.
58.
Rueda,R., Artiles,A. J., Salazar,J. J., & Higareda,I. (2002). An analysis of special education as a response to the diminished academic achievement of Chicano/Latino students: An update. In ValenciaR. R. (Ed.), Chicano school failure and success: Past, present, and future (2nd ed., pp. 310–332). London: Routledge/Falmer.
59.
Shepard,L., & Smith,M. (1983). An evaluation of the identification of learning disabled students in Colorado. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 115–127.
60.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Digest of educational statistics. Washington, DC: Author.
61.
U.S. Department of Education. (2001). The longitudinal evaluation of school change and performance in Title I schools: Final report. Washington, DC: Planning and Evaluation Services.
62.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1998). The schools and staffing survey (SASS) and teacher follow up survey (TFS) CD-ROM: Electronic codebook and public use data for three cycles of SASS and TFS (CD-ROM data file).Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics. (NCES98-312)
63.
U.S. Department of Commerce & Bureau of the Census. (2000). Current population survey, March 1968–2000.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
64.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1993). School-age demographics: Recent trends pose new educational challenges.Washington, DC: Author.
65.
Valencia,R. (2002). Chicano school failure and success: Past, present, and future (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Farmer.
66.
Villegas,A., Chu Clewell,B., Taylor Anderson,B., Goertz,M., Ficklen Joy,M., Bruschi,B., & Irvine,J. (1993). Teaching for diversity: Models for expanding the supply of minority teachers.Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
67.
Wright,P., & Cruz,R. S. (1983). Ethnic composition of special education programs in California. Learning Disability Quarterly,6, 387–394.
