The Vermont Self-Determination Project is a model program for enhancing the self-determination of people with developmental disabilities in a rural state. Definitions of self-determination differ in a larger political perspective from those used in systems of supports and for people with disabilities. A brief historical overview demonstrates individualized funding and self-managed supports in Canada and the United States.
Rural Vermont's developmental services system enhances opportunities for self-determination through the unique program qualities of the Self-Determination Project. These qualities include circles of support, facilitating self-advocacy, system-wide change, and a triad team approach, in addition to approaches to self-determination that include self-management and self-direction. Significant project outcomes point to areas for future exploration by rural as well as urban researchers and practicioners.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AberyB. (1994a). Self-determination: It's not just for everyone. IMPACT, 6(4), 2–3.
2.
AberyB. (1994b). A conceptual framework for enhancing self-determination. In HaydenM. & AberyB. (Eds.) Challenges for a service system in transition: Ensuring quality community experiences for persons with developmental disabilities (pp. 345–380) Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
3.
AberyB., RudrudL., ArndtK., SchaubenL. & EggebeenA, (1995). Evaluating a multicomponent program for enhancing the self-determination of youth with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30, 170–179.
4.
AberyB. & StancliffeR. (1996). The ecology of self-determination. In SandsD. & WehmeyerM. (Eds.) Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 111–145). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
BachM. (1998). Securing self-determination: Building the agenda in Canada. TASH Newsletter, 24(6/7), 8–10.
7.
BeckwithR. (1994). People First! facilitates student self-determination. IMPACT, 6(4), 11.
8.
BissonetteL. (May 1999). Beyond questions and answers: Free expression through arts and words.Keynote address at the Moving On: Facilitated Communication in the 21st Century Conference, Portland, ME
9.
BrothersonM.J., CookC., Cunconan-LahrR., & WehmeyerM. (1995). Policy supporting self-determination in the environments of children with disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 3–14.
10.
BrownF. & GothelfC. (1996). Self-determination for all individuals. In LehrD. & BrownF. (Eds.) People with disabilities who challenge the system (pp. 335–354). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
11.
Campaign for Freedom (1999). Polk Center: Close the doors! Speaking for Ourselves, 15 (Spring 1999), 5–8.
12.
Center on Human Policy (1999). Accomplishments and contributions of the Vermont Self-Determination Project toward promoting choice and control for people with developmental disabilities in Vermont: Summary of findings.Syracuse, NY: Author.
13.
CharltonJ. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability, oppression, and empowerment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14.
ConroyJ. & YuskauskasA. (1996). Independent evaluation of the Monadnock Self Determination Project. Ardmore, PA: Center for Outcome Analysis.
15.
Coon-ComeM. (1992). The right to self-determination of native and indigenous peoples: The case of the Cree nation [Online]. Available: http://elias.ens.fr/Surfaces/vol2/coon
CrowleyR. & NerneyT. (1995, Spring). New Hampshire Self Determination Project. Paper presented at New England Regional TASH Conference, Hartford, CT.
18.
CummingsE. (1997a). A visit with Sean and his team. TASH Newsletter, 23(10), 14.
19.
CummingsE. (1997b). The journey toward self determination: Two people's stories. TASH Newsletter, 23(10), 2–21, 29.
20.
DanforthS. (1997). On what basis hope? Modern progress and postmodern possibilities. Mental Retardation, 35, 93–106.
21.
DavisS. (1994a). Report Card to the Nation on Inclusion of People with Mental Retardation in Community Housing.Arlington, Texas: The Arc of the United States.
22.
DavisS. (1994b). Update on inclusion in education of children with mental retardation. Arlington, Texas: The Arc of the United States.
23.
DehamJ. & ChapmanL. (1997). Self-determination: Transferring agency control by re-thinking its role. TASH Newsletter, 23(10), 9–11.
24.
DennisR., WilliamsW., GiangrecoM., & CloningerC. (1993). Quality of life as context for planning and evaluation of services for people with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 499–512.
25.
DurlakC., RoseE., & BursuckW. (1994). Preparing high school students with learning disabilities for the transition to postsecondary education: Teaching the skills of self-determination. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 51–59.
26.
DybwadG. & BersaniH. (1996). New voices: Self-advocacy by people with disabilities. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
27.
ErtekunN. & NecatigilZ. (1996). The right of self-determination in historical perspective [Online]. Available: http://www.super-cyprus.com/selfdet
28.
EstevaG. & PrakashM.S. (1998). Grassroots postmodernism: Remaking the soil of cultures. NY: Zed Books.
29.
EwaltP. & MokuauN. (1995). Self-determination from a Pacific perspective. Social Work, 40, 168–175.
30.
FalveyM., ForestM., PearpointJ., & RosenbergR. (1994). Building connections. In ThousandJ., VillaR., & NevinA. (Eds.) Creativity and collaborative learning: A powerful guide to empowering students and teachers (pp. 347–368). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
31.
FentonM., EntrikinT., MorrillS., MarburgG., ShumwayD., & NerneyT. (1997). Beyond managed care, volume II: An owner's manual for self-determination. Concord, NH: Self-Determination for Persons With Developmental Disabilities.
32.
FergusonD. (1998). Relating to self-determination: One parent's thoughts. Journal of the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 44–46.
33.
ForestM. & PearpointJ. (1992). Common sense tools: MAPS and circles. In PearpointJ., ForestM., & SnowJ. (Eds.) The inclusion papers: Strategies to make inclusion work (p. 40–51). Toronto, CA: Inclusion Press.
34.
FriedlandB. (1999). How are students with mild intellectual disabilities involved in planning their own transitions? In MontgomeryD. (Ed.) Rural special education for the new millenium. Conference proceedings of the American Council on Rural Special Education (pp. 375–385). Salt Lake City, Utah: American Council on Rural Special Education.
35.
FurneyK., GlesneC., KervickC., PillaiM., & SmithP. (November 1998). The social construction of disability: A scripted conversation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Studies Association, Philadelphia, PA.
36.
GiangrecoM., CloningerC., DennisR., & EdelmanS. (2000). Problem-solving methods to facilitate inclusive education. In VillaR. & ThousandJ. (Eds.) Restructuring for caring and effective education: Piecing the puzzle together. (pp. 293–327). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
37.
GiangrecoM., CloningerC., & IversonV. (1998). Choosing outcomes and accommodations for children: A guide to educational planning for students with disabilities (2nd. Ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
38.
GonzalesL. (1992). Independent living in the future: Ready to meet the challenges. Human Services in the Rural Environment, 15(3), 26–29.
39.
GrochS. (1998). Pathways to protest: The making of oppositional consciousness by people with disabilities. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(12)4533A. (University Microfilms No. 9913804)
40.
HingsburgerD. (2000). Power tools: Thoughts about power and control in service to people with developmental disabilities. Eastman, Quebec: Diverse City Press.
41.
HoffmanA. & FieldS. (1995). Promoting self-determination through effective curriculum development. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30, 134–141.
42.
HuangG. (1999). Socioeconomic changes: Promise and problems for rural education (ERIC Digest). Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Problems for Rural Education. (ERIC # ED425048)
43.
Human Services Research Institute (1997). Participant-driven managed supports: Breaking new ground. Cambridge, MA: Author.
44.
Human Services Research Institute (1999). The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Self-Determination Initiative: Year one impact assessment report.Cambridge, MA: Author.
45.
InnesB., EndersA., SeekinsT., MerrittD., KirshenbaumA., & ArnoldN. (2000). Assessing the geographic distribution of centers for independent living across urban and rural areas: Toward a policy of universal access. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 10, 207–224.
46.
Institute on Disability (1997). MCARE: National clearinghouse on managed care and long term services and supports for adults with developmental disabilities and their families [On-line]. Available: http://iodunh.edu/projects/mcare.htm
47.
Just Do It Committee (1995). Self determination: A transfer of power.Waterbury, VT: Vermont Division of Mental Retardation.
48.
KelkerK., GarthwaitC., & SeligmanM. (1992). Rural special education options. Human Services in the Rural Environment, 15(3), 14–17.
49.
KennedyM. (1998). Response to articles on self-determination. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 47–49.
LakinK.C., AndersonL., ProutyR., & SandlinJ. (1998). Institution closures continue at an average of more than 12 per year. TASH Newsletter, 24(3), 8–9.
52.
Lively Lifelines Integrated Training Group (1997). Self-advocates discuss what self-determination has meant to them. TASH Newsletter, 23(10), 15–17.
MartinJ. & Marshall (1995). ChoiceMaker: A comprehensive self-determination transition program. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30, 147–156.
55.
MendenhallJ. & McBrideM. (1994). Daily self-determination for young children. IMPACT, 6(4), 5.
56.
MeyerL. (1991). Advocacy, research, and typical practices: A call for the reduction of discrepancies between what is and what ought to be, and how to get there. In MeyerL., PeckC., & BrownL. (Eds.) Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp. 629–649). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
57.
MithaugD. (1996). The optimal prospects principle: A theoretical basis for rethinking instructional practices for self-determination. In SandsD. & WehmeyerM. (Eds.) Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 147–165). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
58.
MithaugD. (1998). Your right, my obligation?Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps23, 41–43.
59.
MontgomeryD., BullK., & CutbirthD. (1995). Creativity in rural special education settings: An example with transition. In MontgomeryD. (Ed.) Reaching to the future: Boldly facing challenges in rural communities. Conference proceedings of the American Council on Rural Special Education (pp. 19–24). Salt Lake City, Utah: American Council on Rural Special Education.
60.
NashR. (1996). “Real world” ethics: Frameworks for educators and human service professionals. NY: Teachers College Press.
61.
National Institute on the Education of At-Risk Students (November 1996). Proceedings of the rural education issues meeting. Washington, DC: Author.
NerneyT. & ShumwayD. (1996). Beyond managed care: Self determination for people with disabilities. Concord, NH: Institute on Disability/UAP, University of New Hampshire.
64.
New Hampshire Self Determination Project (1995). An affirmation of community: A revolution of vision and goals (Part 2). TASH Newsletter, 21(8), 19–23.
O'BrienJ. & O'BrienC. L. (1996). Members of each other: Building community in company with people with developmental disabilities. Toronto, Canada: Inclusion Press.
67.
O'BrienJ. & O'BrienC. L. (1998). A little book about person-centered planning. Toronto, Canada: Inclusion Press.
68.
OffnerR., SeekinsT., & ClarkF. (1992). Disability and rural independent living: Setting an agenda for rural rehabilitation. Human Services in the Rural Environment, 15(3), 6–8.
69.
O'LooneyJ. (1993). Organizing services in rural communities: Moving toward service integration and flexible specialization. Part II: Building supports for a flexible model. Human Services in the Rural Environment, 17(1), 5–10.
70.
ParkerK. (March 1996). Republik Maluku: The case for self-determination. Briefing paper presented to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Geneva, Switzerland.
71.
PearpointJ., O'BrienJ., & ForestM. (1993). PATH: A workbook for planning positive possible futures. Planning alternative tomorrows with hope for schools, organizations, businesses, families. Toronto, CA: Inclusion Press.
72.
PerskeR. (1988). Circles of friends: People with disabilities and their friends enrich the lives of one another. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.
73.
ReindalS.M. (1999). Independence, dependence, interdependence: Some reflections on the subject and personal autonomy. Disability and Society, 14, 355–367.
74.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (1996). Request for proposal. Independent choices: Enhancing consumer direction for people with disabilities.Princeton, NJ: Author.
75.
Roeher Institute (1993). Direct dollars: A study of individualized funding in Canada. North York, Ontario: Author.
76.
RojewskiJ. (1990). Issues in vocational education for special populations in rural areas. TASSP: Champaign, IL.
77.
SandovalC. (1997). Grant opens opportunities for disabled. Burlington Free Press, Feb. 24, 1997, 1B.
78.
SathanamthanS. (March 1999). Tamil Eelam: Right to self-determination. Paper presented at the Seminar on Self-Determination and Conflict Prevention. Sponsored by Centre UNESCO de Catalunya and the UNESCO Etxea UNESCO Centre of the Basque Country, Geneva, Switzerland.
79.
ShoultzB. (1996). More thoughts on self-advocacy: The movement, the group, and the individual. TASH Newsletter, 22(10/11), 22–25.
80.
ShoultzB., WalkerP., HulginK., BogdanR., TaylorS., & MoseleyC. (1999). Closing Brandon Training School: A Vermont story. Syracuse, NY: Center on Human Policy.
SmithP. (1999a). Drawing new maps: A radical cartography of developmental disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 69, 117–144.
83.
SmithP. (1999b). “I know how to do”: Choice, control, and power in the lives of people with developmental disabilities. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(11) A (University Microfilms No. 9951862).
84.
SmithP. (1999c). Ideology, politics, and science in understanding developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation, 37, 71–72.
SnowJ. (1998). A review of three papers on self-determination. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 38–40.
87.
SnowJ. (July, 2000). Self-Determination and Citizenship: Opening Plenary. Presentation at the International Conference on Self-Determination and Individualized Funding, Seattle, Washington.
88.
ThousandJ. & VillaR. (2000). Collaborative teams: A powerful tool in school restructuring. In VillaR. & ThousandJ. (Eds.) Restructuring for caring and effective education: Piecing the puzzle together. (pp. 254–292) Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
89.
TopperK.; WilliamsW.; LeoK.; HamiltonR.; & FoxT. (1994). A positive approach to understanding and addressing challenging behaviors: Supporting educators and families to include students with emotional and behavioral difficulties in regular education. Burlington: Center for Developmental Disabilities, University of Vermont.
90.
Van der KliftE. & KuncN. (1994). Beyond benevolence: Friendship and the politics of help. In ThousandJ., VillaR., & NevinA. (Eds.) Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers (pp. 391–401). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co..
91.
Vermont Division of Developmental Services (1996). “Just do it:” Creating an environment that enables self-directed services.Grant proposal submitted to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.Waterbury, VT: Author.
92.
Vermont Division of Developmental Services (1998). Individual support agreement guidelines. Waterbury, VT: Author.
93.
Vermont Division of Developmental Services (1999). Annual report, 1999: Division of developmental services. Waterbury, VT: Author.
94.
Vermont Division of Developmental Services (2000). Annual report, 2000: Division of developmental services. Waterbury, VT: Author.
95.
Vermont Division of Mental Retardation (1993). Closing the doors of the institution, opening the hearts of our community: Brandon Training School, 1915–1993. Waterbury, VT: Author.
Vermont Self-Determination Project (2000). You can get there from here: Finding your way through the service system. Waterbury, VT: Vermont Division of Developmental Services.
98.
WalkerP., ShoultzB., HallM., & HarrisP. (1999). “Learning community” discussion paper: Self-determination in Vermont. Syracuse, NY: Center on Human Policy.
99.
WardM. (1994). Self-determination: A means to an end. IMPACT, 6(4), 8.
100.
WehmeyerM. (1992). Self-determination and the education of students with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27, 302–314.
101.
WehmeyerM. (1994). Self-determination as an educational outcome. IMPACT, 6(4), 6–7.
102.
WehmeyerM., KelchnerK., & RichardsS. (1996). Essential characteristics of self-determined behavior of individuals with mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 100, 632–642.
103.
WehmeyerM. & LawrenceM. (1995). Whose future is it? Promoting student involvement in transition planning. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 18, 69–82.
104.
WehmeyerM. & MetzlerC. (1995). How self-determined are people with mental retardation? The national survey. Mental Retardation, 33, 111–119.
YuanS., Baker-McCueT., & WitkinK. (1996). Coalition for family support and the creation of two flexible funding programs. In SingerG., PowersL., OlsonA. (Eds.) Redefining family support: Innovations in public-private partnerships (pp. 357–385). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
