The research to practice gap continues to be a prominent concern among professionals in the field of education. Traditional staff development in which teachers attend presentations and workshops for a few days each year has been one method for attempting to bring empirically validated instructional practices into the classroom. Unfortunately, traditional staff development has had little effect on classroom practice. This paper will present an alternative strategy for bridging the research to practice gap—bringing university researchers and classroom teachers together to collaboratively plan and execute classroom research. Because a great many universities are located in or near rural areas, rural school districts can provide rich opportunities for collaborative partnerships. This paper will provide guidelines for uniting researchers and practitioners in the endeavor of collaboratively designing and implementing classroom research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottM., WaltonC., TapiaY., & GreenwoodC.R. (1999). Research to practice: A “blueprint” for closing the gap in local schools. Exceptional Children, 65, 339–352.
2.
AlbertoP.A., & TroutmanA.C. (1998). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
3.
AyresB.J., & HedeenD.L. (1998). Creating positive behavior support plans for students with significant behavior challenges. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 17, 27–35.
4.
BillupsL.H. (1997). Response to bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 525–527.
5.
CarnineD. (1997). Bridging the research to practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 513–522.
6.
CooperJ.O., HeronT.E., Heward, W. L. (1987). Applied behavior analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall/Merrill.
7.
CubanL. (1988). A fundamental puzzle of school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 341–344.
8.
CubanL. (1993). The lure of curricular reform and its pitiful history. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 182–185.
9.
GerstenR., VaughnS., DeshlerD., & SchillerE. (1997). What we know about using research findings: Implications for improving special education practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 466–476.
10.
GerstenR., MorvantM., & BrengelmanS. (1995). Close to the classroom is close to the bone: Coaching as a means to translate research into practice. Exceptional Children, 62, 56–67.
11.
GreenwoodC.R., DelquadriJ., & BulgrenJ. (1993). Current challenges to behavioral technology in the reform of schooling: Large-scale, high-quality implementation and sustained use of effective instructional practices. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 401–440.
12.
GreenwoodC.R., & MaheadyL. (1997). Measurable change in student performance: Forgotten standard in teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 265–275.
13.
HubermanM. (1990). Linkage between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 363–391.
14.
JoyceB., & ShowersB. (1995). Student achievement through staff development (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
15.
KaestleC.F. (1993). Research news and comment: The awful reputation of education research. Educational Researcher, January-February, 23–31.
16.
KellerK.A. (1998). Resolving conflicts in rural schools. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 17, 18–26.
17.
KnapczykD., RhodesP., & BrushT. (1994). Improving staff development in rural communities using distance education and communication technology. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 13, 19–24.
18.
LiebermanA., & MillerL. (1991). Teachers—Their world and their work: Implications for school improvement. New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
LombardR.C. (1994). The collaborative transition model: An interdisciplinary approach to meeting the transition needs of rural communities. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 13, 24–26.
20.
MaloufD.B., & SchillerE.P. (1995). Practice and research in special education. Exceptional Children, 61, 414–424.
21.
PurvisJ.R., & TiceT.A. (1996). Making staff development work. Jackson, MS: The Southern Education Consortium.
22.
RichardsonV. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–10.
23.
SashkinM. & EgermeierJ. (1993). School change models and processes: A review and synthesis of research and practice. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 362 960).
24.
SeyfarthJ.T. (1996). Personnel management for effective schools (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
25.
StorerJ.H., & CrosswaitD.J. (1995). Delivering staff development to the small rural school. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 14, 23–30.
26.
ViadaroD. (1994). The great divide: The gap between research and practice is wider in education than in other fields, such as medicine and business. Teacher Magazine, October, 22–24.
27.
WoodF.H., & ThompsonS.R. (1993). Assumptions about staff development based on research and best coaching. Journal of Staff Development, 14, 52–57.
28.
WoodwardJ. (1993). The technology of technology-based instruction: Comments on the research, development, and dissemination approach to innovation. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 345–360
