The conventional approach to modeling electro-optic sensor systems is to develop separate models for individual systems or classes of system, depending on the detector technology employed in the sensor and the application. However, this ignores commonality in design and in components of these systems. A generic approach is presented for modeling a variety of sensor systems, operating in the infrared waveband, that also allows systems to be modeled with different levels of detail and at different stages of the product life cycle. The provision of different model types (parametric and image-flow descriptions) within the generic framework can allow valuable insights to be gained.
[1] Ulgen, O. M., D. Berkin, M. Brazier, et al. “Management of Simulation Technology in Large Companies: A Panel Discussion,” In Proceedings of the 1995 Summer Simulation Conference, edited by T. J. Ören and L. G. Birta, 361–366. Ottawa, Canada, July 24–26, 1995.
2.
[2] Smith, M. I., D. Hickman, and D. J. Murray-Smith. “Mathematical Modeling of Electro-Optic Systems Using a Generic Modeling Environment,” In Proceedings SPIE, vol. 3061, 443–454. Washington: SPIE Press, 1997.
3.
[3] Barron, D., M. I. Smith, and D. Hickman. “Evaluation of Synthetic IR Scene Generators for Their Use in Electro-Optic Modeling and Simulation,” In Proceedings of the SPIE Aerosense 97 Conference.Orlando. Washington: SPIE Press, 1997.
4.
[4] Smith, M. I. “The Design, Verification and Validation of a Generic Electro-optic Sensor Model for System Performance Evaluation,” Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, University of Glasgow, 1999.
5.
[5] Smith, M. I., and D. Hickman. “An Approach to the Development of a Generic Electro-Optic System Model,” In Proceedings of the NATO IRIS Conference, London, 1996.
6.
[6] Smith, M. I., and D. Hickman. “Modeling of an IRST System,” In Proceedings of the SPIE Aerosense 96 Conference, vol. 27, 44–61. Washington: SPIE Press.
7.
[7] Smith, M. I., D Hickman, and G. W. Lane. “Modeling and Analysis of Missile Approach Warner Sensors,” In Proceedings of the NATO IRIS Conference.Canada. 1998.
8.
[8] Visser, W. P. J., and M. J. Broomhead. GSP “A Generic Object-Oriented Gas Turbine Simulation Environment,” National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, Flight Division, Technical Report NLR-TP-2000–267, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000.
9.
[9] Ericsen, T. S.“Physics Based Design, The Future of Modeling and Simulation,”Acta Polytechnica45 (4, 2005): 59–64.
10.
[10] Ericsen, T.“Power Electronic Building Blocks-A Systematic Approach to Power Electronics,” In Proceedings IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, vol. 2, 1216–1218, 2000.
11.
[11] Valasek, M., P. Steinbauer, Z. Sika, et al. “Knowledge Support of Simulation Model Development by Reuse,” In Proceedings 5th MATHMOD Vienna, edited by I. Troch and P. Breitenecker. February 2006, ARGESIM, Vienna, 2006.
12.
[12] Smith, M. I., D. J. Murray-Smith, and D. Hickman. “Verifcation and Validation Issues in a Generic Model of Electro-Optic Sensor Systems,”Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation4(1)2007.
[16] Rogers, S. K., and M. Kabrisky. An Introduction to Artificial and Biological Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition.Washington: SPIE Optical Engineering Press, 1991.
17.
[1] Guleyuponglu, S., and H. Ng.“Linking Real-Time and Faster- Than-Real-Time Federations,” paper no. 01S-SIW-131. In Proceedings of the Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 2001.
18.
[2] Hanna, J., J. Reaper, T. Cox, and M. Walter. “Course of Action Simulation Analysis.” In Proceedings of the 10th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. (Accessed July 6, 2006), 2005. Available from: htp://www.dodccrp.org/events/2005/10th/CD/papers/113.pdf
19.
[3] Gilmour, D. A., J. P. Hanna, W. E. McKeever, Jr., and M. J. Walter. “Real-Time Course of Action Analysis.” In Proceedings of the 10th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. (Accessed July 6, 2006), 2005. Available from: htp://www.dodccrp.org/events/2005/10th/CD/papers/073.pdf
20.
[4] Mathews, K. “Development of a Course of Action Simulation Capability.” Scientific & Technical Report, Australian Government Department of Defence, Defence Science and Technology Organisation. (Accessed July 6, 2006). Available from: htp://www.dsto.defence.gov.au/publications/3437/DSTO-CR-0376.pdf
21.
[5] Smith, R.“Simulation: The Engine Behind The Virtual World,”Simulation 2000 Series, Vol. 1. (Accessed August 5, 2006), 2000. Available from: htp://www.modelbenders.com/papers/sim2000/SimulationEngine.PDF
22.
[6] Smith, R.“Strategic Directions in Distributed Simulation,”Simulation 2000 Series, Vol. 2. (Accessed August 5, 2006), 2000. Available from: htp://www.modelbenders.com/papers/sim2000/SimulationDirections.PDF
23.
[7] IEEE Std 1278.1, “IEEE Standard for Distributed Interactive Simulation-Application Protocols.”New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.,1995.
24.
[8] Wilson, A. L., and R. M. Weatherly. “The Aggregate Level Simulation Protocol: An Evolving System,”781–787. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 1994.
25.
[9] IEEE Std. 1516.1, “IEEE Standard for Modeling and Simulation (M&S), High Level Architecture (HLA)-Federate Interface Specification,” i-467, 2000.
26.
[10] Browers, A., and A. L. Prochnow. “JTLS-JCATS Federation Support of Emergency Response Training.” In Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference. (Accessed August 5, 2006), 2003. Available from: htp://www.informs-cs.org/wsc03papers/130.pdf
27.
[11] Myjak, M. D., D. Clark, and T. Lake. “RTI Interoperability Study Group Final Report,” paper no. 99F-SIW-001. In Proceedings of the 1999 Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, FL, USA, 1999.
28.
[12] Myjak, M. D., and S. T. Sharp. “Implementations of Hierarchical Federations,” paper no. 99F-SIW-180. In Proceedings of the Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, FL, USA, 1999.
29.
[13] Wood, D. D., and M. D. Pety. “HLA Gateway 1999,” paper no. 99S-SIW-051. In Proceedings of the Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 1999.
30.
[14] Filsinger, J.“HLA Security Guard Federate,”1015–1023. In Proceedings of the Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, FL, USA.1997.
31.
[15] Chen, D., B. S. Lee, W. Cai, and S. J. Turner. “Design and Development of a Cluster Gateway for Cluster-based HLA Distributed Virtual Simulation Environments,”193–200. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Simulation Symposium (ANSS′03), 2003.
32.
[16] Braudaway, W, and R. Little. “The High Level Architecture's Bridge Federate,” paper no. 97F-SIW-078. In Proceedings of the Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, FL, USA, 1997.
33.
[17] Dingel, J., D. Garlan, and C. Damon. “Bridging the HLA: Problems and Solutions,”33–42. In Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Workshop on Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications, 2002.
34.
[18] Paterson, D. J., E. S. Hougland, and J. J. Sanmiguel. “A Gateway/Middleware HLA Implementation and the Extra Services that can be Provided to the Simulation,” paper no. 00F-SIW-007. In Proceedings of the Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 2000.
35.
[19] “Extended Air Defense Simulation (EADSIM).” (Accessed July 27, 2006. Available from: htp://www.asc.hpc.mil/sofware/info/eadsim/
36.
[20] Simon, R., W.S. Chang, and J. M. Pullen. “An Agent Architecture for Network Support of Distributed Simulation Systems,”68–75. In Proceedings of the Symposium of the Seventh IEEE Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications, 2003.
37.
[21] Fujimoto, R. M.“Time Management in the High Level Architecture,”Simulation71 (6, 1998) 388–400.
38.
[1] Kelly, L. L.The Pilot Maker, p. 38. New York: Grosset & Dunlap, 1970.
39.
[2] U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Harrisburg Flight Standards District Office, February 11, 2002.
40.
[3] Proctor, M. D., M. Panko, and S. Donovan. “Considerations for Training Team Situation Awareness and Task Performance through PC-Gamer Simulated Multi-Ship Helicopter Operations,”International Journal of Aviation Psychology14 (2, 2004): 191–205.
41.
[4] Proctor, M. D., M. Bauer, and T. Lucario. “Serious Gaming for Search and Rescue Helicopter Flight Training”International Journal of Aviation Psychology, (Under Review).
42.
[5] Proctor, M. D, J. Curley, and W. C. Williams. “Interoperable Training through a Simulation Game,” 2002 European Simulation Interoperability Workshop. 2002.
43.
[6] U.S. Military Academy. 2006. Available from: htp://www.usma.edu/dmi/warcen.htm
44.
[7] Barlow, M., et al. “Factors in Team Performance in a Virtual Squad Environment,”94–99. In SimTecT 2004 Conference Proceedings, Canberra, Australia, May 2004, 2004.
45.
[8] Morrison, P., and M. Barlow. “Child's Play? Coercing a COTS Game into a Military Experimentation Tool,”72–77. In Proceedings of SimTecT 2004, Canberra, Australia, May 2004, 2004.
46.
[9] Krulak, General Charles H. Interview with Jim Lehrer, Public Broadcasting System, June 1999.
47.
[10] Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory. 2001. Available from: htp://www.mcwl.quantico.usmc.mil
48.
[11] Department of the Navy. “The Batle for Hue: Casualty and Disease Rates During Urban Warfare,” 2000.
49.
[12] Defense Science Board. “Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Training Superiority & Training Surprise,” 2001.
50.
[13] Gundersen, M. “Opportunities for Collaboration Between the Defense and Entertainment Research Communities.” Position Paper, Commitee on Modeling and Simulation. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1997
51.
[14] Thurman, R. A., and J. S. Matoon. “Virtual Reality: Toward Fundamental Improvements in Simulation-Based Training.”Educational Technology (October, 1994): 56–64.
52.
[15] McCarty, C. T.“Playing with Computer Games: An Exploration of Computer Game Simulations and Learning.”University of London Institute of Education, 2001.
53.
[16] Laird, J. E.“An Exploration into Computer Games and Computer Generated Forces.”The Eighth Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavior Representation. Orlando, FL, May 2000.
54.
[17] Laird, J. E., and M. C. van Lent. “Human-level AI's Killer Application: Interactive Computer Games.”American Association for Artificial Intelligence Spring Symposium Series: Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Entertainment, Orlando, FL, 1999.
55.
[18] Pillay, H., J. Brownlee, and L. Wilss. “Cognition and Recreational Computer Games: Implications for Education Technology.”Journal of Research on Computing in Education32 (1, 1999): 203–215.
[20] Yin, R. K.Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 2003.
58.
[21] Commanding Officer. “Leter of Instruction for Close Quarters Batle Course 1–06.” Marine Corps Security Force, Training Company Letter 1500 CQB/JSD, September 22, 2005.
59.
[22] Fowlkes, J., D. J. Dwyer, R. L. Oser, and E. Salas. “Event-Based Approach to Training (EBAT).”The International Journal of Aviation Psychology8 (3, 1998): 209–221.
60.
[23] “Marine Corps Security Force Battalion Training and Readiness Manual,” NAVMC Directive 3500.80, July 25, 2005.
