This paper numerically solves the third-order fluid flow during calendering with slip condition at the rolls. The basic equations are transformed into dimensionless forms and simplified by adopting LAT (Lubrication Approximation Theory). The flow equations are then solved with the perturbation technique. Whereas a finite difference scheme along with TDMA (Tridiagonal Matrix Algorithm) is implemented to solve the energy equation. Engineering parameters like power input, exit distance, and roll separating force are computed. The impact of slip parameter and material parameter on the velocity profile, pressure, pressure gradient, temperature profile, power input, detachment point, and roll separating force is portrayed through graphs and discussed. It is noticed that both the parameters and exhibit opposite behaviors and give insight to the mechanisms that control the physical and engineering parameters.
SiddiquiAMZahidMRanaMA, et al.
Calendering analysis of a third-order fluid. J Plast Film Sheet2014;
30: 345–368.
13.
ZahidMRanaMASiddiquiAM, et al.
Modeling of non-isothermal flow of a magnetohydrodynamic, viscoplastic fluid during calendering. J Plast Film Sheet2016;
32: 74–96.
14.
AliNJavedMASajidM.Theoretical analysis of the exiting thickness of sheets in the calendering of FENE-P fluid. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech2015;
225: 28–36.
15.
SajidMAliNJavedMA.An exact solution for the calendering analysis of a third order fluid. J Plast Film Sheet2017;
33: 124–141.
16.
SajidMSiddiqueHAliN, et al.
Calendering of non-isothermal Rabinowitsch fluid. J Poly Eng2018;
38: 83–92.
17.
AliNJavedMAAtifHM.Non-isothermal analysis of calendering using couple stress fluid. J Plast Film Sheet2018;
34: 358–381.
18.
AliNAtifHMJavedMA, et al.
A mathematical model of the calendered exiting thickness of micropolar sheet. Polym Eng Sci2018;
58: 327–334.
19.
JavedMAAliNArshadS.Numerical analysis of the calendering process by using Giesekus fluid model. J Plast Film Sheet2020;
36: 167–190.
20.
KhaliqSAbbasZ.A theoretical analysis of roll-over-web coating assessment of viscous nanofluid containing Cu-water nanoparticles. J Plast Film Sheet2020;
36: 55–75.
21.
AbbasZKhaliqS.Calendering analysis of non-isothermal viscous nanofluid containing Cu-water nanoparticles using two co-rotating rolls. J Plast Film Sheet. Epub ahead of print 17 August 2020. DOI: 10.1177/8756087920951614.
22.
AzamMXuTKhanM.Numerical simulation for variable thermal properties and heat source/sink in flow of cross nanofluid over a moving cylinder. Int Comm Heat Mass Transf2020;
118: 104832.
23.
AzamMShakoorARasoolHF, et al.
Numerical simulation for solar energy aspects on unsteady convective flow of MHD cross nanofluid: a revised approach. Int J Heat Mass Transf2019;
131: 495–505.
24.
WakifA.A novel numerical procedure for simulating steady MHD convective flows of radiative Casson fluids over a horizontal stretching sheet with irregular geometry under the combined influence of temperature-dependent viscosity and thermal conductivity. Math Probl Eng2020;
2020: 1–20.
25.
WakifAChamkhaAThummaT.Thermal radiation and surface roughness effects on the thermo-magneto-hydrodynamic stability of alumina–copper oxide hybrid nanofluids utilizing the generalized Buongiorno’s nanofluid model. J Therm Analy Calorimetry. Epub ahead of print 16 March 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10973-020-09488-z.
26.
AzamMXuTShakoorA, et al.
Effects of Arrhenius activation energy in development of covalent bonding in axisymmetric flow of radiative-Cross nanofluid. Int Comm Heat and Mass Trans2020;
113: 104547.
27.
ZaydanMWakifAAnimasaunIL, et al.
Significances of blowing and suction processes on the occurrence of thermo-magneto-convection phenomenon in a narrow nanofluidic medium: a revised Buongiorno's nanofluid model. Case Studies Therm Eng2020;
22: 100726.
28.
WakifABoulahiaZAliF, et al.
Numerical analysis of the unsteady natural convection MHD couette nanofluid flow in the presence of thermal radiation using single and two-phase nanofluid models for Cu–water nanofluids. Int J Appl Comp Math2018;
4: 81.
29.
FosdickRLRajagopalKR.Thermodynamics and stability of fluids of third grade. Proc R Soc A3391980; 369: 351–377.
30.
SiddiquiAMKaloniPN.Plane steady flows of a third grade fluid. Int J Eng Sci1987;
25: 171–188.
31.
HayatTQureshiMUAliN.The influence of slip on the peristaltic motion of a third order fluid in an asymmetric channel. Physics Letters A2008;
372: 2653–2664.
32.
SahooBDoY.Effects of slip on sheet-driven flow and heat transfer of a third grade fluid past a stretching sheet. Int Comm Heat and Mass Trans2010;
37: 1064–1071.
33.
HayatTMehmoodOU.Slip effects on MHD flow of third order fluid in a planar channel. Comm Nonlin Sci Num Sim2011;
16: 1363–1377.
34.
CarapauFCorreiaPGriloLM. Specific shear-dependent viscoelastic third-grade fluid model. In: International conference of computational methods in sciences and engineering (ICCMSE 2016). College Park, MD: AIP Conf. Proc, 1790, pp.140008-1–140008-4.
35.
BejanA.Convection heat transfer.
New York:
Wiley, 2004.
36.
SpaldingMHyunKVlachopoulosJ. The SPE guide on extrusion technology and troubleshooting (ch. 6). In: Resin processing properties. Dallas: SPE, 2001.
