This study investigates the impact of system effects on the dynamic behavior of light frame timber buildings (LFTBs) through shake table tests and numerical analysis. Here, the term “system effects” encompasses the influence of the transverse shear walls, the out-of-plane bending stiffness of the diaphragms, and the gravity load, particularly in LFTBs with non-planar shear walls. The findings of this research reveal that system effects notably reduce story drift demands and enhance the lateral stiffness and damping ratio of LFTBs with respect to results from numerical models that do not consider component interactions. This observation highlights a discrepancy between the actual lateral stiffness and that predicted by existing models, particularly at relatively small levels of story drift. The underestimation of these engineering parameters is more apparent at the lower stories, underscoring the significant role of the gravity load in amplifying the beneficial effects of the transverse shear walls and the out-of-plane bending stiffness of the diaphragms. These insights are vital to refine the seismic design and analysis of LFTBs and underscore the importance of incorporating system effects into both numerical and analytical models. This enhanced understanding of component interactions in LFTBs sets the stage for increasing adoption of LFTBs as a sustainable and resilient building solution in earthquake-prone areas.
ANSI/ AWC (2021) ANSI/AWC SDPWS-2021 Special Design Provisions for Wind and Seismic. Leesburg, VA: American Wood Council.
2.
APA (2012) Panel Design Specification. Tacoma, WA: The Engineered Wood Association.
3.
ASTM (2019) ASTM E2126-19 Standard Test Methods for Cyclic (Reversed) Load Test for Shear Resistance of Vertical Elements of the Lateral Force Resisting Systems for Buildings. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
4.
BenedettiFJara-CisternaAGrandónJCAstrozaNOpazo-VegaA (2022) Numerical analysis of the seismic performance of light-frame timber buildings using a detailed model. Buildings12(7): 981.
5.
BerwartSEstrellaXMontañoJSanta-MaríaHAlmazánJLGuindosP (2022) A simplified approach to assess the technical prefeasibility of multistory wood-frame buildings in high seismic zones. Engineering Structures257: 114035.
6.
BrownJRLiMPalermoAPampaninSSartiF (2021) Experimental testing of a low-damage post-tensioned C-shaped CLT core-wall. Journal of Structural Engineering147(3): 04020357.
7.
BSI (2012) BS EN 14592: 2008+ A1: 2012, Timber Structures—Dowel-Type Fasteners—Requirement. London: British Standards Institution.
CasagrandeDGrossiPTomasiR (2016) Shake table tests on a full-scale timber-frame building with gypsum fibre boards. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products74: 425–442.
10.
CeccottiA (2008) New technologies for construction of medium-rise buildings in seismic regions: The XLAM case. Structural Engineering International18(2): 156–165.
11.
CeccottiASandhaasCOkabeMYasumuraMMinowaCKawaiN (2013) SOFIE project–3D shaking table test on a seven-storey full-scale cross-laminated timber building. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics42(13): 2003–2021.
12.
D’ArenzoGRuggeriEMFossettiM (2024) Lateral performance of cross-laminated timber shear walls connected to perpendicular walls: Experimental tests and analytical modeling. Journal of Structural Engineering150(8): 04024080.
13.
D’ArenzoGSchwendnerSSeimW (2021) The effect of the floor-to-wall interaction on the rocking stiffness of segmented CLT shear-walls. Engineering Structures249: 113219.
14.
DolanJHeineC (1997) Sequential Phased Displacement Tests of Wood Framed Shear Walls with Corners. Blacksburg, VA: Prepared for the NAHB Research Center, Inc. by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
15.
EstrellaXGuindosPAlmazánJLMalekS (2020) Efficient nonlinear modeling of strong wood frame shear walls for mid-rise buildings. Engineering Structures215: 110670.
16.
EstrellaXGuindosPAlmazánJLMalekSSanta MaríaHMontañoJBerwartS (2021) Seismic performance factors for timber buildings with woodframe shear walls. Engineering Structures248: 113185.
17.
FiliatraultAChristovasilisIPWanitkorkulAVan de LindtJW (2010) Experimental seismic response of a full-scale light-frame wood building. Journal of Structural Engineering136(3): 246–254.
18.
FiliatraultAFischerDFolzBUangCM (2001) Shake table testing of a full-scale two-story woodframe house. In: Proceedings, structures 2001: a structural engineering Odyssey, Washington, DC, 21–23 May.
19.
FiliatraultAFischerDFolzBUangCM (2002) Seismic testing of two-story woodframe house: Influence of wall finish materials. Journal of Structural Engineering128(10): 1337–1345.
20.
FiorinoLMacilloVLandolfoR (2017) Shake table tests of a full-scale two-story sheathing-braced cold-formed steel building. Engineering Structures151: 633–647.
21.
FolzBFiliatraultA (2004a) Seismic analysis of woodframe structures. I: Model formulation. Journal of Structural Engineering130(9): 1353–1360.
22.
FolzBFiliatraultA (2004b) Seismic analysis of woodframe structures. II: Model implementation and verification. Journal of Structural Engineering130(9): 1361–1370.
23.
HernándezFDíazPAstrozaROchoa-CornejoFZhangX (2021) Time variant system identification of superstructures of base-isolated buildings. Engineering Structures246: 112697.
24.
HopkinsAFellBDeierleinGMirandaE (2014) Large-scale tests of seismically enhanced planar walls for residential construction. Report No. 186. Stanford, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center.
25.
INN (2009) Norma Chilena Oficial NCh 433 Of1996 Mod2009 Diseño Sísmico de Edificios. Santiago, Chile: Instituto Nacional de Normalizacion (in Spanish).
26.
INN (2024) Norma Chilena Oficial NCh 1198 Of2024 Madera—Construcciones en Madera—Calculo. Santiago, Chile: Instituto Nacional de Normalizacion (in Spanish).
27.
IsodaHMatsudaMTesfamariamSTamoriS (2021) Shake table test of full-size wooden houses versus wall test result: Comparison of load-deformation relationship. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities35(5): 04021043.
28.
JayamonJRLinePCharneyFA (2018) State-of-the-art review on damping in wood-frame shear wall structures. Journal of Structural Engineering144(12): 03118003.
29.
JuangJ-NCooperJWrightJ (1988) An Eigensystem Realisation Algorithm using Data Correlations (ERA/DC) for modal parameter identification. Control—Theory and Advanced Technology4(1): 5–14.
30.
KochkinVMcKeeS (2001) Wood shear walls with corners. Upper Marlboro, MD: Prepared for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research by NAHB Research Center, Inc.
31.
LeungTAsizAChuiYHuLJMohammadM (2010) Predicting lateral deflection and fundamental natural period of multi-storey wood frame buildings. In: Proceedings of the world conference on timber engineering, 2010, Trentino, 20–24 June.
32.
LopezNBerwartSGuindosP (2025) The link frame model (LFM), a tool for the seismic analysis of timber frame buildings considering system effects. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products83: 52.
33.
MartinKGGuptaRPrevattDODatinPLVan de LindtJW (2011) Modeling system effects and structural load paths in a wood-framed structure. Journal of Architectural Engineering17(4): 134–143.
34.
OrellanaPSanta MaríaHAlmazánJLEstrellaX (2021) Cyclic behavior of wood-frame shear walls with vertical load and bending moment for mid-rise timber buildings. Engineering Structures240: 112298.
35.
PanYVenturaCEBebamzadehAMotamediM (2021) Modeling of a shake-table tested retrofitted wood-frame building subjected to subduction ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics50(9): 2510–2528.
36.
PangWHassanzadeh ShiraziSM (2013) Corotational model for cyclic analysis of light-frame wood shear walls and diaphragms. Journal of Structural Engineering139(8): 1303–1317.
37.
PeiSVan de LindtJW (2009) Coupled shear-bending formulation for seismic analysis of stacked wood shear wall systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics38(14): 1631–1647.
38.
PeiSVan de LindtJW (2011) Seismic numerical modeling of a six-story light-frame wood building: Comparison with experiments. Journal of Earthquake Engineering15(6): 924–941.
39.
QuizangaDAlmazánJLValdiviesoDLopez-GarciaDGuindosP (2024) Shaking table test of a timber building equipped with a novel cost-effective, impact-resilient seismic isolation system. Journal of Building Engineering82: 108402.
40.
RuggeriEMD’ArenzoGCavoliDLCottonaroRDFossettiM (2023) Experimental investigation on the lateral performance of CLT shear walls connected to perpendicular walls. Procedia Structural Integrity44: 464–471.
41.
SartoriTCasagrandeDTomasiRPiazzaM (2012) Shake table test on 3-storey light-frame timber building. In: Proceedings of the world conference on timber engineering 2012, Auckland, New Zealand, 15–19 July.
42.
SeibleFFiliatraultAUangCM (1999) Proceedings of the invitational workshop on seismic testing, analysis and design of woodframe construction. Preface, CUREE Publication No. W-01. Richmond, CA: Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering.
43.
ShahnewazMPopovskiMTannertT (2020) Deflection of cross-laminated timber shear walls for platform-type construction. Engineering Structures221: 111091.
TamagnoneGRinaldinGFragiacomoM (2018) A novel method for non-linear design of CLT wall systems. Engineering Structures167: 760–771.
47.
TamagnoneGRinaldinGFragiacomoM (2020) Influence of the floor diaphragm on the rocking behavior of CLT walls. Journal of Structural Engineering146(3): 04020010.
48.
TomasiRSartoriTCasagrandeDPiazzaM (2015) Shaking table testing of a full-scale prefabricated three-story timber-frame building. Journal of Earthquake Engineering19(3): 505–534.
49.
UangCMGattoK (2003) Effects of finish materials and dynamic loading on the cyclic response of woodframe shearwalls. Journal of Structural Engineering129(10): 1394–1402.
50.
UgaldeDLopez-GarciaD (2020) Analysis of the seismic capacity of Chilean residential RC shear wall buildings. Journal of Building Engineering31: 101369.
51.
Valdivieso CascanteDQuizangaDAlmazánJLopez-GarciaDLielALópezNHernándezFGuindosP (2025) Shake table testing for system effects analysis in a 1:2 scale three-story light frame timber building. Designsafe-CI. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-2kfj-8g47 (accessed 5 June 2025).
52.
ValdiviesoDAlmazánJLLopez-GarciaDMontañoJLielABGuindosP (2024) System effects in T-shaped timber shear walls: Effects of transverse walls, diaphragms, and axial loading. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics53(8): 2532–2554.
53.
ValdiviesoDGuindosPMontañoJLopez-GarciaD (2023a) Experimental investigation of multi-layered strong wood-frame shear walls with nonstructural Type X gypsum wallboard layers under cyclic load. Engineering Structures282: 115797.
54.
ValdiviesoDLopez-GarciaDAlmazanJMontañoJGuindosP (2023b) Testing the influence of 3D coupling effects on the lateral response of non-planar T-shape wood frame shear walls. In: Proceedings of the world conference on timber engineering, Oslo, 19–22 June.
55.
Van De LindtJW (2008a) Energy-based similitude for shake table testing of scale woodframe structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering12(2): 281–292.
56.
Van de LindtJW (2008b) Experimental investigation of the effect of multiple earthquakes on woodframe structural integrity. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction13(3): 111–117.
57.
Van de LindtJWLiuHPeiS (2007) Performance of a woodframe structure during full-scale shake-table tests: Drift, damage, and effect of partition wall. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities21(1): 35–43.
58.
Van de LindtJWPeiSLiuHFiliatraultA (2010a) Three-dimensional seismic response of a full-scale light-frame wood building: Numerical study. Journal of Structural Engineering136(1): 56–65.
59.
Van de LindtJWPeiSPryorSEShimizuHIsodaH (2010b) Experimental seismic response of a full-scale six-story light-frame wood building. Journal of Structural Engineering136(10): 1262–1272.
60.
Van de LindtJWPryorSEPeiS (2011) Shake table testing of a full-scale seven-story steel–wood apartment building. Engineering Structures33(3): 757–766.
WuDYamazakiYSawadaSSakataH (2018) Shaking table tests on 1/3-scale model of wooden horizontal hybrid structure. Journal of Structural Engineering144(8): 04018123.
63.
XueJGuoRXuDQiLHeZ (2020) Shaking table test on 1/2-scale model of column-and-tie timber structure filled with wooden walls. Journal of Structural Engineering146(12): 04020281.
64.
YasumuraM (1999) Testing and evaluation of seismic performance of woodframe structures in Japan— State-of-the-art and research needs. In: Proceedings of the invitational workshop on seismic testing, analysis and design of woodframe construction, Preface, CUREE Publication No. W-01. Richmond, CA: Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
