This paper presents new empirical models for estimating displacements on surface-fault ruptures for reverse faults within a hazard forecasting framework. These models include revised relationships between earthquake magnitude and maximum or average displacement and revised distributions of normalized principal displacement as a function of location along fault strike. This work has been in conjunction with the Fault Displacement Hazard Initiative (FDHI) and utilizes the recently released database that contains surface-fault displacement and rupture trace data from global reverse and reverse-oblique mechanism earthquakes.
AllenT.I.WaldD.J. (2009). On the use of high-resolution topographic data as a proxy for seismic site conditions (VS 30). Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 99(2A), 935–943.
2.
BaizeS.NurminenF.SarmientoA.DawsonT.TakaoM.ScottiO.AzumaT.BoncioP.ChampenoisJ.CintiF.R.CivicoR.CostaC.GuerrieriL.MartiE.McCalpinJ.OkumuraK.VillamorP. (2020). A worldwide and Unified Database of Surface Ruptures (SURE) for fault displacement hazard analyses, Seismological Research Letters, 91(1), 499–520.
3.
BaldwinJ.N.KelsonK.I.RandolphC.E. (2000). Late quaternary fold deformation along the Northridge Hills fault, Northridge, California: Deformation coincident with past Northridge blind-thrust earthquakes and other nearby structures?Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90(3), 629–642.
4.
BiasiG.P.WeldonR.J. (2006). Estimating surface rupture length and magnitude of paleoearthquakes from point measurements of rupture displacement. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96(5), 1612–1623.
5.
BuwaldaJ.P.AmandP.S. (1955). Geological effects of the Arvin-Tehachapi earthquake. Earthquakes in Kern County, California During 1952, 171, 41–56.
6.
CaskeyJ. (1995). Geometric relations of dip slip to a faulted ground Surface: New nomograms for estimating components of fault displacement, Journal of Structural Geology, 17(8), 1197–1202.
7.
ChenR.PetersenM. (2019). Improved implementation of rupture location uncertainty in fault displacement hazard assessment. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 109(5), 2132–2137.
8.
ChiouB.S.J.YoungsR.R. (2008). NGA model for average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. PEER Report No. 2008/09, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
9.
D’AgostinoR.StephensM. (1986). Goodness-of-fit Techniques, Dekker, New York, New York.
10.
DolanJ.HaravitchB. (2014). How well do surface slip measurements track slip at depth in large strike-slip earthquakes? The importance of fault structural maturity in controlling on-fault slip versus off-fault surface deformation, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 388, 38–47.
11.
EllsworthW. (2003). Appendix D—Magnitude and area data for strike slip earthquakes. In Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP), 2003, Earthquake probabilities in the San Francisco Bay region; 2002–2031: U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2003–214, 13p., available online: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2003/of03-214/.
12.
FerrarioM.F.LivioF. (2021). Conditional probability of distributed surface rupturing during normal-faulting earthquakes. Solid Earth, 12, 1197–1209.
13.
FialkoY.SandwellD.SimonsM.RosenP. (2005). Three-dimensional deformation caused by the Bam, Iran, earthquake and the origin of shallow slip deficit, Nature, 435, 295–299.
14.
GlenJ.M.McKeeE.H.LudingtonS.PonceD.A.HildenbrandT.G.HopkinsM.J. (2004). Geophysical terranes of the Great Basin and parts of surrounding provinces. US Geological Survey Open-File Report, 1008, 303.
15.
GouletC.BozorgniaY.AbrahamsonN.KuehnN.Al AtikL.YoungsR.GravesR.AtkinsonG. (2018). Central and eastern North America ground-motion characterization. PEER Report No. 2018/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
16.
HanksT.BakunW. (2002). A bilinear source-scaling model for M-log A observations of continental earthquakes, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92(5), 1841–1846.
17.
HanksT.BakunW. (2008). M-log A observations for recent large earthquakes, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 98, 490–494.
18.
HanksT.BakunW. (2014). M-log A models and other curiosities, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 104(5), 2, 604–2, 610.
19.
HanksT.C.KanamoriH. (1979). A moment magnitude scale. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 84(B5), 2348–2350.
20.
HeatonT.TajimaF.MoriA. (1986). Estimating ground motions using recorded accelerograms, Surveys in Geophysics, 8(1), 25–83.
21.
HeckerS.AbrahamsonN.WooddellK. (2013). Variability of displacement at a point: Implications for earthquake-size distribution and rupture hazard on faults, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103, 651–674.
22.
KanamoriH. (1977). The energy release in great earthquakes. Journal of geophysical research, 82(20), 2981–2987.
23.
KuehnN.M.KottkeA.R.SarmientoA.C.MadugoC.M.BozorgniaY. (2024). A fault displacement model based on the FDHI database. Earthquake Spectra doi:10.1177/87552930241262766.
24.
LavrentiadisG.AbrahamsonN.A.Fault-displacement models for aggregate and principal displacements. Earthquake Spectra (this volume). Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/87552930231201531.
25.
LeeJ.M.AndersonJ.BeauducelF.NicolskyD. (2019). Geophys: Geophysics, Continuum Mechanics, Gravity Modeling. Codes for analyzing various problems of geophysics, continuum mechanics, and gravity models. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/geophys/index.html
26.
LeonardM. (2010). Earthquake fault scaling: Self-consistent relating of rupture length, width, average displacement, and moment release. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 100(5A), 1971–1988.
27.
LeonardM. (2014). Self-consistent earthquake fault-scaling relations: Update and extension to stable continental strike-slip faults. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 104(6), 2953–2965.
28.
LettisW.R.WellsD.L.BaldwinJ.N. (1997). Empirical observations regarding reverse earthquakes, blind thrust faults, and quaternary deformation: Are blind thrust faults truly blind?Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 87(5), 1171–1198.
29.
MaY.ClaytonR.W. (2016) Structure of the Los Angeles Basin from ambient noise and receiver functions, Geophysical Journal International, 206(3), 1645–1651, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw236.
30.
ManighettiI.CampilloM.SammisC.MaiP.M.KingG. (2005). Evidence for self-similar, triangular slip distributions on earthquakes: Implications for earthquake and fault mechanics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 110(B5).
31.
MarchandonM.HollingsworthJ.RadiguetM. (2021). Origin of the shallow slip deficit on a strike slip fault: influence of elastic structure, topography, data coverage, and noise, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 554, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116696.
32.
MossR.E.S.BuelnaM.StantonK.V. (2018). Physical, analytical, and numerical modeling of reverse-fault displacement through near-surface soils. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 108(6), 3149–3159.
33.
MossR.E.S.RossZ. (2011). Probabilistic Fault Displacement Hazard Analysis for Reverse Faults. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, 101(4), 1542–1553.
34.
MossR.E.S.StantonK.V.BuelnaM.I. (2013). The impact of material stiffness on the likelihood of fault rupture propagating to the ground surface. Seismological Research Letters, 84(3), 485–488.
NurminenF.BaizeS.BoncioP.BlumettiA.M.CintiF.R.CivicoR.GuerrieriL. (2022). SURE 2.0–New release of the worldwide database of surface ruptures for fault displacement hazard analyses. Scientific Data, 9(1), 729.
37.
OettleN.K.BrayJ.D. (2013). Fault rupture propagation through previously ruptured soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139(10), 1637–1647.
38.
OkadaY. (1985). Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 75(4), 1135–1154.
39.
PetersenM.D.DawsonT.E.ChenR.CaoT.WillsC.J.SchwartzD.P.FrankelA.D. (2011). Fault displacement hazard for strike-slip faults. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101(2), 805–825.
40.
PizzaM.FerrarioM.F.ThomasF.TringaliG.LivioF. (2023). Likelihood of primary surface faulting: updating of empirical regressions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 113(5), 2106–2118
41.
ProctorR.J.CrookR.Jr.McKeownM.H.MorescoR.L. (1972). Relation of known faults to surface ruptures, 1971 San Fernando earthquake, southern California, Geological Society of America Bulletin, 83(6), 1601–1618.
42.
SarmientoA.MadugoD.BozorgniaY.ShenA.MazzoniS.LavrentiadisG.DawsonT.MadugoC.KottkeA.ThompsonS.BaizeS.MillinerC.NurminenF.BoncioP.VisiniF. (2021). Fault displacement hazard initiative database: GIRS Report 2021-08, B. John Garrick Institute for the Risk Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, available online: https://www.risksciences.ucla.edu/girs-reports/2021/08.
43.
SarmientoA.LavrentiadisG.BozorgniaY.AbrahamsonN.ChenR.ChiouB.DawsonT.KottkeA.KuehnN.MadugoC.MossR.ThompsonS.ZandiehA. (2024). Comparisons of FDHI fault displacement models for principal and aggregate displacement, Earthquake Spectra. XXXX
44.
SarmientoA.MadugoD.ShenA.DawsonT.MadugoC.ThompsonS.BozorgniaY.BaizeS.BoncioP.KottkeA.LavrentiadisG.MazzoniS.MillinerC.NurminenF.VisiniF. (2024). Database for the Fault Displacement Hazard Initiative Project. Earthquake Spectra. First published Jul 30, 2024
45.
SavageH.M.BrodskyE.E. (2011). Collateral damage: Evolution with displacement of fracture distribution and secondary fault strands in fault damage zones. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 116(B3).
46.
ShawB.E. (2009). Constant stress drop from small to great earthquakes in magnitude-area scaling, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 99(2A), 871, doi:10.1785/0120080006.
47.
ShawB.E. (2013a). Earthquake surface slip-length data is fit by constant stress drop and is useful for seismic hazard analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103(2A), 876–893.
48.
ShawB.E. (2013b). Appendix E—evaluation of magnitude-scaling relationships and depth of rupture. In FieldE.H., et al., Uniform California earthquake rupture forecast, version 3 (UCERF3) - The time-independent model. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013–1165_Appendix E., 23 pp.
49.
SteppJ.C.WongI.WhitneyJ.QuittmeyerR.AbrahamsonN.ToroG.YoungsR.CoppersmithK.SavyJ.SullivanT., and Yucca Mountain PSHA Project Members, 2001. Probabilistic seismic hazard analyses for fault displacement and ground motions at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, Earthquake Spectra, 17(1), 113–151.
50.
StreigA.R.RubinC.M.ChenWen-ShanChenYue-GauLeeLong-ShengThompsonS.C.MaddenC.Shih-TingLu (2007). Evidence for prehistoric coseismic folding along the Tsaotun segment of the Chelungpu fault near Nan-Tou, Taiwan. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 112, no. B3.
51.
TakaoM.AnnakaT.KuritaT. (2018). Establishment of evaluation formulae for probabilistic fault displacement hazard analysis (PFDHA) in Japan. In Best Practices in Physics-Based Fault Rupture Models for Seismic Hazard Assessment of Nuclear Installations, IAEA TECDOC1833, 16 p.
52.
TakaoM.TsuchiyamaJ.AnnakaT.KuritaT. (2013). Application of probabilistic fault displacement hazard analysis in Japan. Journal of Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering, 13(1), 17–36.
53.
TakaoM.UetaK.AnnakaT.KuritaT.MakaseH.KyoyaT.KatoJ. (2014). Reliability improvement of probabilistic fault displacement hazard analysis. Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering, 14(2), 16–36.
54.
TerzaghiK. (1943). Theoretical Soil Mechanics, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
55.
USGS (1971). The San Fernando, California, earthquake of February 9, 1971: a preliminary report published jointly by the U.S. Geological Survey and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 733.
56.
ValentiniA.FukushimaY.ContriP.OnoM.SakaiT.ThompsonS.C.VialletE.AnnakaT.ChenR.MossR.E.S.PetersenM.D.VisiniF.YoungsR.R. (2021). Probabilistic Fault Displacement Hazard Assessment (PFDHA) for nuclear installations according to IAEA safety standards. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 111(5), 2661–2672.
57.
WaldD.J.AllenT.I. (2007). Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site conditions and amplification. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(5), 1379–1395.
58.
WalkerR.BergmanE.JacksonJ.GhorashiM.TalebianM. (2005). The 22 June 2002 Changureh (Avaj) earthquake in Qazvin province, NW Iran: epicentral re-location, source parameters, surface deformation and geomorphology, Geophysical Journal International, 160, 707–720.
59.
WellsD.L.CoppersmithK.J. (1994). New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84(4), 974–1002.
60.
WesnouskyS.G. (2008). Displacement and geometrical characteristics of earthquake surface ruptures: Issues and implications for seismic-hazard analysis and the process of earthquake rupture. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 98(4), 1609–1632.
YangX.LiW.ZhenQ. (2015). Calculation of reverse-fault-related parameters using topographic profiles and fault bedding, Geodesy and Geodynamics, 6(2), 106–112.
63.
YoungsR.R.ArabaszW.J.AndersonR.E.RamelliA.R.AkeJ.P.SlemmonsD.B.McCalpinJ.P.DoserD.I.FridrichC.J.SwanF.H.IIIRogersA.M. (2003). A methodology for probabilistic fault displacement hazard analysis (PFDHA). Earthquake Spectra, 19(1), 191–219.
