Unreinforced stone masonry buildings represent a significant part of the building stock in the areas affected by the recent devastating earthquakes of 6 February 2023 in Turkey. Most of them were built before 2000, and, hence, they are not compliant with current seismic provisions. Severe damage or collapse was observed in a large number of low-rise stone masonry buildings, including many listed as monuments ones. The structural systems of masonry buildings in the historical center of two cities (namely, Gaziantep and Antakya) are presented herein, along with the typical damage observed. The causes of damage are qualitatively interpreted, wherever relevant evidence is available. To this purpose, the observed damage is compared to that occurred in other parts of the world, in structural systems similar to those of the area affected. Furthermore, the detrimental effect of inadequate pre-earthquake interventions is identified, while a critical discussion regarding frequently applied interventions, and the availability of design rules in current Codes and Guidelines, is initiated to pave the way toward efficient measures to be taken for the protection of surviving stone masonry buildings in Turkey and beyond.
AbrahamczykLSchwarzJLanghammerTGenesMCBikceMKacinSYakutAErberikAMGülkanP (2012) Empirical and analytical vulnerability assessment of the masonry building stock in Antakya (Hatay/Turkey). In: Proceedings of the 15th world Conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon, 24–28 September 2012.
2.
AFAD (2018) Türkiye’s new earthquake hazard map. Available at: https://en.afad.gov.tr/ (accessed 6 February 2024).
3.
AFAD (2023) Earthquake data centre system. Available at: https://tdvms.afad.gov.tr/ (accessed 6 February 2024).
4.
AhunbayZAltayGArunGAydemirOAtasagunFDCelepZAltug ErberikMİlkiAKuranFÜnalZGAközFOlgunNŞimşekMKayaYUçarY (2017) A guideline for earthquake risk management of historical structures in Turkey. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on earthquake engineering and engineering seismology, Anadolu University, Eskişehir, 11–13 October.
5.
AktasYDIoannouIMalciogluFSVatteriAPKontoeMDonmezKBlackJDanai Kazantzidou-FirtinidouDDermanisPDiri-AkyildizF (2022) Traditional structures in Turkey and Greece in 30 October 2020 Aegean sea earthquake: Field observations and empirical fragility assessment. Frontiers in Civil Engineering8: 840159.
6.
BalIEVatanM (2009) Earthquake resistance of traditional houses in Turkey: Timber-frame infilled structures. In: ChiltonJMunganI (eds) Timber Structures: From Antiquity to the Present. Istanbul: T.C. HaliçÜniversitesi.
CEN (2005) EN 1998-3. Eurocode 8: design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings.
10.
EERI (2011) A Tutorial: Improving the Seismic Performance of Stone Masonry Buildings (Bothara J and Brzev S). 1st ed. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 2011.
EPPO (2023) Code for Assessment and Structural Interventions to Masonry. Athens: Earthquake Planning and Protection Organization (in Greek).
13.
Eroğlu AzakTAyBŐ (2023) 6 Şubat 2023 Kahramanmaraş Depremlerinin Etkilediği İllerdeki Bina Stokunun Özellikleri, Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi47(1): 1294425 (in Turkish).
14.
GEER (Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance) (2023) EERI, GEER, Earthquake Engineering Association, Earthquake Engineering Foundation, February 6, 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes Report on Geoscience and Engineering Impacts, GEER Association, Report no 082.
15.
General Directorate of Foundation (2017) A guideline for earthquake risk management of historical structures. Ankara: METU IIS (in Turkish).
16.
ICOMOS/ISCARSAH (2003) Principles for the analysis, conservation and structural restoration of architectural heritage. In: ICOMOS / ISCARSAH Committee, ICOMOS 14th general assembly, Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, 27–31October.
ISO(2010) ISO 13822. Bases for design of structures—assessment of existing structures.
19.
MELISSA (1989) Greek Traditional Architecture (East Aegean-Sporades-Eptanissa). Vol.1. Athina: MELISSA, pp. 283 (in Greek).
20.
MihçioğluETümerEU (2020) Building typologies in between the vernacular and the modern: Antakya (Antioch) in the early 20th century. Sage Open10: 3318.
21.
Miltiadou-FezansATassiosThP (2022) Mix-design and Application of Hydraulic Grouts for Masonry Strengthening. 1st ed. New York: Springer, p. 283.
22.
Miltiadou-FezansAVintzileouEMouzakis Ch DourakopoulosJGiannopoulosPDelinikolasN (2018) Structural analyses of the Katholikon of Daphni Monastery with alternative interventions improving its overall behavior. In: Proceedings of the 16th European conference on earthquake engineering, Thessaloniki, 18–21June.
23.
Ministero per I and Beni e le attività culturali (2006) Linee Guida per la valutazione e riduzione del rischio sismico del patrimonio culturale con riferimento alle norme tecniche per le costruzioni. Roma: Gangemi Editore.
24.
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employments; The Earthquake Commission; The New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering; The Structural Engineering Society; The New Zealand Geotechnical Society (2018) The Seismic Assessment of Existing Buildings. Technical Guidelines for Engineering Assessments-part C, Unreinforced Masonry Buildings C8. Available at: https://www.building.govt.nz/building-code-compliance/b-stability/b1-structure/seismic-assessment-existing-buildings/ (assessed 30 October 2023).
MouzakisCAdamiC-EKarapittaLVintzileouE (2018) Seismic behaviour of timber-laced stone masonry buildings before and after interventions: Shaking table tests on a two-storey masonry model. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering16(2): 803–829.
27.
MüllerUMiccoliLFontanaP (2016) Development of a lime based grout for cracks repair in earthen constructions. Construction and Building Materials110: 323–332.
28.
MunariMda PortoFBartolozziAMocelliniMValdesoloAModenaC (2011) Analisi di vulnerabilità sismica e interventi di miglioramento strutturale di un aggregato nel centro storico di L’Aquila. In: Conference ANIDIS, Bari, 18–22September.
29.
NikolopoulouVAdamiCEKaragiannakiDVintzileouEMiltiadou-FezansA (2018) Grouts for strengthening two- and three-leaf stone masonry, made with earthen mortars. International Journal of Architectural Heritage13: 663–678.
30.
PapayianniIPachtaV (2015) Experimental study on the performance of lime-based grouts used in consolidating historic masonries. Materials and Structures48(7): 2111–2121.
31.
PiazzaM (2008) The role of in-plane floor stiffness in the seismic behaviour of traditional buildings. In: Proceedings of the14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China, 12–17October2008.
32.
RocaP (2020) The ISCARSAH Guidelines on the analysis, conservation and structural restoration of architectural heritage. In: Proceedings of the12th international conference on structural analysis of historical constructions (SAHC2020) (eds RocaPPelàLMolinsC), Barcelona, 16–18September.
33.
SayınEYönBCalayırYKaratonM (2013) Failures of masonry and adobe buildings during the June 23, 2011 Maden-(Elazığ) earthquake in Turkey. Engineering Failure Analysis34: 779–791.
34.
SextosADe RisiRPagliaroliAFotiSPasseriFAusilioECairoRCapattiMChChianbrandoFChiaradonnaADashtiSDe SilvaFDeziFDuranteMGGialliniSLanzoGSicaSSimonelliALZimmaroP (2018) Local site effects and incremental damage of buildings during the 2016 central Italy earthquake sequence. Earthquake Spectra34(4): 1639–1669.
35.
SezginHA (1992) Architecture Traditionelle des Balkans. Turquie. Athens: MELISSA Editions, p. 72 (in French).
36.
SilvaRASchueremansLOliveiraDVDekoningKGysselsT (2012) On the development of unmodified mud grouts for repairing earth constructions: Rheology, strength and adhesion. Materials and Structures45(10): 1497–1512.
37.
ToumbakariEE (2002) Lime-pozzolan-cement grouts and their structural effects on composite masonry walls. Doctor Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
38.
ValluzziMR (2000) Comportamento meccanico di murature storiche consolidate con materiali e tecniche a base di calce. Doctor Thesis, University of Trieste, Trieste (in Italian).
39.
ValluzziMRdi BellaAGarbinE (2013) Optimization of mechanical and acoustic performance of timber floors. Advanced Materials Research778: 690–697.
40.
ValluzziMRGarbin Dalla BenettaEMModenaC (2010) In-plane strengthening of timber floors for the seismic improvement of masonry buildings. In: Proceedings of the world conference on Timber Engineering, Riva Del Garda, 20–24 June.
41.
VintzileouE (2008) The effect of timber ties on the behaviour of historic masonry. ASCE, Journal of Structural Engineering134(6): 961–972.
42.
VintzileouE (2011) Timber-reinforced structures in Greece: 2500 BC–1900 AD. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Structures and Buildings164(3): 167–180.
43.
VintzileouEMiltiadou-FezansA (2008) Mechanical properties of three-leaf stone masonry grouted with ternary or hydraulic lime-based grouts. Engineering Structures30(8): 2265–2276.
44.
VintzileouETassiosTP (1995) Three leaf stone masonry strengthened by injecting cement grouts. ASCE, Journal of Structural Engineering121(5): 848–856.
45.
VintzileouETouliatosP (2005) Seismic behaviour of the historical structural system of the island of Lefkada, Greece. In: Proceedings of the Conference STREMAH, Malta, 22–24 June, pp. 291–300. Southampton: WIT Press.
46.
VintzileouEMouzakisCAdamiCEKarapittaL (2015) Seismic behavior of three-leaf stone masonry buildings before and after interventions: Shaking table tests on a two-storey masonry model. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering13(10): 3107–3133.
47.
WangMLiuKGuragainRShresthaHMaX (2019) Shake table tests on the two-storey dry-joint stone masonry structures reinforced with timber laces and steel wires. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering17: 2199–2218.
