We develop a site amplification model for a regional geologic condition that includes surficial deposits of peaty organic soils in Hokkaido, Japan. We use ground motion data from national Japanese networks along with local data from the study region. We apply a non-reference site approach to infer site effects from misfits of reference ground motion models to data from 10 subduction zone earthquakes. Application of this approach requires removal of source-specific biases and careful consideration of source-to-site path effects. These considerations are essential to avoid mapping source- or path-related model misfits into estimates of site response. We consider three subduction ground motion models as reference models. By paying special attention to the conditions for which the path models are effective, and making adjustments for between-island path misfits (Hokkaido to Honshu and vice versa), we identify regional site effects that are insensitive to the ground motion models used in their derivation. Observed site responses are characterized by strong resonances at first-mode site frequencies, and as a result the regional model is conditioned on peak frequency from horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios.
AbrahamsonNAYoungsRR (1992) A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America82(1): 505–510.
2.
AbrahamsonNAKuehnNGulerceZGregorNBozorgniaYParkerGAStewartJPChiouBIdrissIMCampbellKWYoungsRR (2018) Update of the BC hydro subduction ground-motion model using the NGA-subduction dataset. Report no. 2018/02, 12July. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
3.
AhdiSKKwakDYAnchetaTDContrerasVKishidaTKwokAOLMazzoniSRuzFStewartJP (2022) Site parameters applied in NGA-Sub database. Earthquake Spectra38(1): 494–520.
4.
Al AtikL (2015) NGA-East: Ground-motion standard deviation models for Central and Eastern North America. Report no. 2015/09. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, June.
5.
BatesDMMächlerMBolkerBWalkerS (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67: 1–48.
6.
BonillaLFSteidlJHGarielJ-CArchuletaRJ (2002) Borehole response studies at the Garner Valley downhole array, Southern California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America92(8): 3165–3179.
7.
BooreDM (2010) Orientation-independent, nongeometric-mean measures of seismic intensity from two horizontal components of motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America100(4): 1830–1835.
8.
Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) (2020) NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures. Washington, DC: BSSC.
9.
CadetHBardP-YDuvalA-MBertrandE (2012) Site effect assessment using KiK-net data: Part 2—Site amplification prediction equation based on f0 and Vsz. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering10(2): 451–489.
10.
ContrerasVStewartJPKishidaTDarraghRBChiouBSJMazzoniSYoungsRRKuehnNMAhdiSKWooddellKBoroschekRRojasFOrdenesJ (2022) NGA-Sub source and path database. Earthquake Spectrahttps://doi.org/10.1177/87552930211065054.
11.
CramerCHJamboE (2020) Impact of a larger fore-arc region on earthquake ground motions in South-Central Alaska including the 2018 M 7.1 Anchorage inslab earthquake. Seismological Research Letters91: 174–182.
12.
García-JerezAPiña-FloresJSánchez-SesmaFJLuzónFPertonM (2016) A computer code for forward calculation and inversion of the H/V spectral ratio under the diffuse field assumption. Computers & Geosciences97: 67–78.
13.
GhofraniHAtkinsonGM (2011) Forearc versus backarc attenuation of earthquake ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America101(6): 3032–3045.
14.
GhofraniHAtkinsonGM (2014) Site condition evaluation using horizontal-to-vertical response spectral ratios of earthquakes in the NGA-West 2 and Japanese databases. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering67: 30–43.
15.
GhofraniHAtkinsonGMGodaK (2013) Implications of the 2011 M9.0 Tohoku Japan earthquake for the treatment of site effects in large earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering11(1): 171–203.
16.
GriffithsSCCoxBRRathjeEMTeagueDP (2016) Surface-wave dispersion approach for evaluating statistical models that account for shear-wave velocity uncertainty. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering142(11): 04016061.
17.
HarmonJHashashYMAStewartJPRathjeEMCampbellKWSilvaWJIlhanO (2019) Site amplification functions for central and eastern North America—Part II: Modular simulation-based models. Earthquake Spectra35: 815–847.
18.
HassaniBAtkinsonGM (2018a) Application of a site-effects model based on peak frequency and average shear-wave velocity to California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America108: 351–357.
19.
HassaniBAtkinsonGM (2018b) Site-effects model for central and eastern North America based on peak frequency and average shear-wave velocity. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America108: 338–350.
20.
HassaniBYongAAtkinsonGMFengTMengL (2019) Comparison of site dominant frequency from earthquake and microseismic data in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America109(3): 1034–1040.
21.
Hokkaido River Disaster Prevention Research Center (HRDPRC) (2004) H15 Tokachi-Oki River Disaster Investigation Report. HRDPRC (in Japanese). Hokkaido, Japan.
22.
KawaseHSánchez-SesmaFJMatsushimaS (2011) The optimal use of horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios of earthquake motions for velocity inversions based on diffuse-field theory for plane waves. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America101(5): 2001–2014.
23.
KishidaTDarraghRBChiouBSJBozorgniaYMazzoniSContrerasVBoroschekRRojasFStewartJP (2020) Chapter 3: Ground motions and intensity measures. In: StewartJP (ed.) Data Resources for NGA-Subduction Project (Report no. 2020/02, 16March). Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, pp. 17–39.
24.
KwakDYStewartJPMandokhailS-JParkD (2017) Supplementing VS30 with H/V spectral ratios for predicting site effects. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America107(5): 2028–2042.
25.
LachetCHatzfeldDBardP-YTheodulidisNPapaioannouCSavvaidisA (1996) Site effects and microzonation in the city of Thessaloniki (Greece) comparison of different approaches. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America86(6): 1692–1703.
26.
LermoJChávez-GarcíaFJ (1993) Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America83(5): 1574–1594.
27.
ParkerGAStewartJPBooreDMHassaniBAtkinsonGM (2022) NGA-subduction global ground motion models with regional adjustment factors. Earthquake Spectra38: 456–493.
28.
Rodriguez-MarekAMontalvaGACottonFBonillaF (2011) Analysis of single-station standard deviation using the KiK-net Data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America101(3): 1242–1258.
29.
RyanH (1994) Ricker, Ormsby, Klauder, Butterworth—A choice of wavelets. CSEG Recorder, September, vol. 19, issue no. 7, pp. 8–9. September.
30.
SeyhanEStewartJP (2014) Semi-empirical nonlinear site amplification from NGA-West2 data and simulations. Earthquake Spectra30(3): 1241–1256.
31.
SeyhanEStewartJPAnchetaTDDarraghRBGravesRW (2014) NGA-West2 site database. Earthquake Spectra30(3): 1007–1024.
32.
Site Effects Assessment Using Ambient Excitations (SESAME) (2004) Guidelines for the implementation of the H/V spectral ratio technique on ambient vibrations—Measurements, processing and interpretation. European Commission, Project no. EVG1-CT-2000-00026. Available at: http://sesame.geopsy.org/Papers/HV_User_Guidelines.pdf (last accessed January 3, 2022).
33.
SkarlatoudisAPapazachosCB (2012) Preliminary study of the strong ground motions of the Tohoku, Japan, earthquake of 11 March 2011: Assessing the influence of anelastic attenuation and rupture directivity. Seismological Research Letters83: 119–129.
34.
StaffordPJ (2014) Crossed and nested mixed-effects approaches for enhanced model development and removal of the ergodic assumption in empirical ground-motion models. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America104(2): 702–719.
35.
StewartJPAfshariKGouletCA (2017) Non-ergodic site response in seismic hazard analysis. Earthquake Spectra33(4): 1385–1414.
36.
TheodulidisNBardP-YArchuletaRBouchonM (1996) Horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio and geological conditions: The case of Garner Valley Downhole Array in southern California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America86(2): 306–319.
37.
TsaiY-T (2018) Characterizing seismic performance of levees on peaty organic soils from case histories and simulations. PhD Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
38.
WakamatsuKMatsuokaM (2013) Nationwide 7.5-arc-second Japan engineering geomorphologic classification map and VS30 zoning. Journal of Disaster Research8(5): 904–911.
39.
WangPStewartJPBozorgniaYBooreDMKishidaT (2017) “R” package for computation of earthquake ground-motion response spectra. Report no. 2017/09. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, December.
40.
WangPZimmaroPGospeTAhdiSKYongAStewartJP (2021) Horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios from California sites: Open-source database and data interpretation to establish site parameters. Report GIRS 2021-06. Natural Hazards Risk and Resiliency Research Center, The B. John Garrick Institute for the Risk Sciences (GIRS), UCLA. Available at: https://doi.org/10.34948/n3kw20 (last accessed January 3, 2022).
41.
WangPZimmaroPBuckreisTEGospeTBrandenbergSJAhdiSKYongAStewartJP (2022). Relational database for Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratios. Seism. Research Letters93(2A): 1075–1088.
42.
WatheletMChatelainJ-LCornouCDi GiulioGGuillierBOhrnbergerMSavvaidisA (2020) Geopsy: A user-friendly open-source tool set for ambient vibration processing. Seismological Research Letters91: 1878–1889.
43.
ZhaoJXJiangFShiPXingHHuangHHouRZhangYYuPLanXRhoadesDASomervillePGIrikuraKFukushimaY (2016a) Ground-motion prediction equations for subduction slab earthquakes in Japan using site class and simple geometric attenuation functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America106(4): 1535–1551.
44.
ZhaoJXLiangXJiangFXingHZhuMHouRZhangYLanXRhoadesDAIrikuraKFukushimaYSomervillePG (2016b) Ground-motion prediction equations for subduction interface earthquakes in Japan using site class and simple geometric attenuation functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America106(4): 1518–1534.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
