Risk-based bridge component importance measures under seismic loads

Abstract

This article formulates risk-based component importance measures (RCIMs) to identify critical components for a bridge subjected to earthquakes. RCIM, unlike traditional reliability-based importance measures, is well suited for complex systems like bridges as it uses a flexible system failure definition using bridge level risk consequences or performance objectives. Contrasting traditional notions of risk and reliability related to structural system failures, the RCIMs embrace a broader definition of risk which includes consequences of system failure to society and the environment. System failure is defined as exceedance of a user-defined threshold of system risk (e.g. based on cost, emissions, embodied energy, or other metrics). Our definition of system failure using global performance metrics helps relating component to system reliability explicitly and offers an alternative perspective to aggregate joint failure events of bridge components into relevant damage states. RCIM combines information about the reliability of a component and its contribution to the system performance and hence the importance measures developed offer risk mitigation indicators for decision makers as to which components may require upgrade to achieve a given performance objective. The proposed RCIMs generalize existing importance measures through analytical exploration of the entire space of system configurations with correlated component failures, while also considering multiple risk-based criteria beyond reliability. These RCIMs, demonstrated through a seismic bridge system case study, further show that as the bridge components age and the hazard intensity varies, the relative contribution of the components to system risk also shifts.