Restricted accessReplyFirst published online 2022-8
RESPONSE TO Discussion by J. Ruiz-García and E. Miranda on “Post-earthquake fast damage assessment using residual displacement and seismic energy: Application to Mexico City”
BojórquezERuiz-GarcíaJ (2013) Residual drift demands in moment-resisting steel frames subjected to narrow-band earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics42: 1583–1598.
2.
BojórquezERuizSETerán-GilmoreA (2008) Reliability-based evaluation of steel structures using energy concepts. Engineering Structures30(6): 1745–1759.
3.
Bravo-HaroMAElghazouliAY (2018) Permanent seismic drifts in steel moment frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research148: 589–610.
4.
ChristopoulosCPampaninSNigel PriestleyMJ (2003) Performance-based seismic response of frame structures including residual deformations. Part I: Single-degree of freedom systems. Journal of Earthquake Engineering7: 97–118.
5.
ChristidisAADimitroudiEGHatzigeorgiouGDBeskosDE (2013) Maximum seismic displacements evaluation of steel frames from their post-earthquake residual deformation. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering11: 2233–2248
6.
FEMA (2012) Seismic performance assessment of buildings, Vol. 1—Methodology. Report FEMA P-58-1, prepared by Applied Technology Council.
7.
GuerreroHRuiz-GarcíaJJiT (2017) Residual displacement demands of conventional and dual oscillators subjected to earthquake ground motions characteristic of the soft soils of Mexico City. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering98: 206–221.
8.
HatzigeorgiouGDPapagiannopoulosGABeskosDE (2011) Evaluation of maximum seismic displacements of SDOF systems from their residual deformation. Engineering Structures33: 3422–3431.
9.
JiDWenWZhaiCKatsanosEI (2018) Residual displacement ratios of SDOF systems subjected to ground motions recorded on soft soils. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering115: 331–335. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.001.
10.
LiossatouEFardisMN (2015) Residual displacements of RC structures as SDOF systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics44: 713–734.
11.
MacraeGAKawashimaK (1997) Post-earthquake residual displacements of bilinear oscillators. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics26: 701–716.
12.
MahinSABerteroVV (1981) An evaluation of inelastic seismic design spectra. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 107 (ST9), 1777–1795.
13.
QuindePTerán-GilmoreAReinosoE (2019) Cumulative structural damage due to low cycle fatigue: An energy-based approximation. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. Epub ahead of print 21November. DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2019.1692736.
14.
QuindePTerán-GilmoreAReinosoE (2020) Residual displacement estimation for soft soils: Application to Mexico city lake-bed. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering130: 105970.
15.
QuindePTerán-GilmoreAReinosoE (2021) Post-earthquake fast damage assessment using residual displacement and seismic energy: Application to Mexico City. Earthquake Spectra37(4): 2795–2812. DOI: 10.1177/87552930211021872
16.
RamirezCMMirandaE (2012) Significance of residual drifts in building earthquake loss estimation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics41: 1477–1493.
17.
ReinosoEQuindePBuendíaLRamosS (2021) Intensity and damage statistics of the September 19, 2017 Mexico earthquake: influence of soft story and corner asymmetry on the damage reported during the earthquake. Earthquake Spectra. DOI: 10.1177/8755293020981981
18.
RiddellRNewmarkNM (1979) Statistical analysis of the response of nonlinear systems subjected to earthquakes. Research Report 468, Un. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, ILL, pp. 291.
19.
Ruiz-GarcíaJAguilarJD (2015) Aftershock seismic assessment taking into account postmainshock residual drifts. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics44: 1391–1407.
20.
Ruiz-GarcíaJCárdenasY (2021) Seismic performance assessment of weak first-storey RC buildings designed with old and new seismic provisions for Mexico City. Engineering Structures232: 111803.
21.
Ruiz-GarcíaJGuerreroH (2017) Estimation of residual displacement ratios for simple structures built on soft-soil sites. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering100: 555–558.
22.
Ruiz-GarcíaJGuerreroH (2019) Prediction of residual displacement ratios for simple structures built on soft-soil sites of Mexico City. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering126: 105809.
23.
Ruiz-GarcíaJMirandaE (2004) Inelastic displacement ratios for design of structures on soft soils sites. Journal of Structural Engineering130: 1475–1486.
24.
Ruiz-GarcíaJMirandaE (2005) Performance-based assessment of existing structures accounting for residual displacements. PhD Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
25.
Ruiz-GarcíaJMirandaE (2006a) Residual displacement ratios for assessment of existing structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics35: 315–336.
26.
Ruiz-GarcíaJMirandaE (2006b) Evaluation of residual drift demands in regular multi-storey frames for performance-based seismic assessment. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics35: 1609–1629.
27.
Ruiz-GarcíaJMirandaE (2006c) Inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of structures built on soft soil sites. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics35: 679–694.
28.
Ruiz-GarcíaJMirandaE (2007) Probabilistic estimation of maximum inelastic displacement demands for performance-based design. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics36: 1235–1254.
29.
Ruiz-GarcíaJRamos-CruzJM (2020) Assessment of permanent drift demands in steel moment-resisting steel buildings due to recorded near-fault forward directivity earthquake ground motions and velocity pulse models. Structures27: 1260–1273.
30.
Terán-GilmoreAJirsaJO (2005) A damage model for practical seismic design that accounts for low cycle fatigue. Earthquake Spectra21(3): 803–832.
31.
YazganUDazioA (2011) The use of post-earthquake residual displacements as a performance indicator in seismic assessment. Georisk5: 59–76.