Seismic fragility of mobile (manufactured) homes is investigated. Compiled is a catalog of home performance in past earthquakes. Intensity measures causing damage are characterized by peak ground acceleration and velocity. Damage is defined as when the home is knocked out of position necessitating repairs and re-installation. Four categories of support conditions are identified: unanchored, tie-downs, proprietary systems, and perimeter wall foundations. Suggested fragility curves for unanchored homes and homes with tie-downs are derived from computer simulations. As a benchmark, a fragility curve for proprietary and perimeter wall systems is taken as the same as that for conventional wood homes. Shortcomings of using tie-down and proprietary systems in high seismic zones are discussed. The suggested fragility curves account for the different categories of support conditions thereby representing advancement to those in the Hazus national standardized risk modeling methodology.
BakerJLinTShahiSJayaramN (2011) New Ground Motion Selection Procedures and Selected Motions for the PEER Transportation Research Program. PEER Report 2011/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, March.
California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) (1989) Evaluation of Manufactured Housing Support System Performance in the Loma Prieta Earthquake. Sacramento, CA: HCD.
6.
EidingerJMaisonBMcDonoughP (2021) Natural gas system performance in Magna M5.7 2020 earthquake. Manuscript submitted for publication in Earthquake Spectra, July.
HallJF (2006) Problems encountered from the use (or misuse) of Rayleigh damping. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics35: 525–545.
12.
JohnABlume Associates (JAB) (1972) Observations of damage to Glendale swimming pools, mobile homes, and commercial buildings resulting from the San Fernando Earthquake of 1971. Report JAB-99-91, JAB Research Division, October.
13.
MaisonBCobeenK (2016) Analytical study of mobile home response to the 2014 South Napa earthquake. Earthquake Spectra32: 1–22.
MarshallRD (1977) The measurement of wind loads on a full-scale mobile home. NBSIR Report 77-1289. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards, 120 pp.
19.
National Conference of States on Building Codes and Standards (NCSBCS) (1994) Northridge Earthquake Effect on Manufactured Housing in California. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (1995) Minimizing Damage and Repair Costs to Manufactured Homes during an Earthquake. Office of Policy Development and Research. Available at: https://www.huduser.gov/publications/pdf/pdrbrch.pdf (accessed 4 November 2021).
25.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (2002) Guide to Foundation and Support Systems for Manufactured Homes. Prepared by Manufactured Housing Research Alliance, New York, March. Office of Policy Development and Research. Available at: https://huduser.gov/Publications/PDF/foundations_guide.pdf (accessed 4 November 2021).
26.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (2008) Research and Analysis for Manufactured Housing Foundations: Ground Anchor Verification Testing. Office of Policy Development and Research. Available at: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/destech/grnd_anchor_2d.html (accessed: 4 November 2021).
27.
WaldDJQuitorianoVHeatonTHKanamoriH (1999) Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California. Earthquake Spectra15(3): 557–564.
