Response study of the tallest California building inferred from the Mw7.1 Ridgecrest,California earthquake of 5 July 2019 and ambient motions

Abstract

The newly constructed tallest building in California, the 73-story Wilshire Grand in Los Angeles, California, is designed in conformance with performance-based design procedures. The building is designed with concrete core–shear walls, three outriggers with buckling restrained braces (BRBs) located along the height, and two three-story truss-belt structural systems. The building is equipped with a 36-channel accelerometric seismic monitoring array that recorded the recent Mw7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake of 5 July 2019, as well as the Mw6.4 Ridgecrest earthquake of 4 July 2019. In this article, only the Mw7.1 event of 5 July 2019 is studied because of a larger response of the subject building during that earthquake. The earthquake records of 5 July 2019 are specifically studied to determine its dynamic characteristics and building-specific behavior. The structure exhibits torsional behavior most likely due to abrupt asymmetrical changes in the thickness and size in-plan of the core–shear walls. The translational and torsional modes during the earthquake are not closely coupled, which does not lead to a beating effect even though there is an appearance of it in the records. Available ambient records are used only to identify modal frequencies of the building and compare them with those from the Mw7.1 event of 5 July 2019. Due to the relatively low amplitude of shaking during the earthquake, the drift ratios are too small to cause any damage. It is expected that during stronger shaking levels likely to be caused by future events, these characteristics may change and the effect of BRBs can be better assessed.

Keywords

Tall building Ridgecrest earthquake seismic instrumentation core–shear walls mode shape frequency damping basin effect

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

(2002) Check out the earthquake shock absorbers on LA’s newest skyscraper. Science. Available at: https://www.wired.com/2016/09/wilshire-grand-taking-risk-seismic-strategy/ (accessed 13 September 2016).

AMEC (2012) Report of Geotechnical consultation proposed Wilshire Grand project, Los Angeles, CA (Non-public report).

ASCE/SEI Standard 7-05 (2005) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.

Bendat

Piersol

(1980) Engineering Applications of Correlation and Spectral Analysis. New York: John Wiley.

Bodeux

J-B

Golinval

J-C

(2001) Application of ARMAV models to the identification and damage detection of mechanical and civil engineering structures. Smart Materials and Structures 10(3): 479.

Boroschek

Mahin

(1991) Investigation of the seismic response of a lightly-damped torsionally-coupled building. Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report UCB/EERC-91/18, University of California, Berkeley, 291 pp.

California Building Code (CBC) (2010) The California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 02.1: gov.ca.bsc.title24.2010.part02.1 (2010 California Building Code), California Building Standards Commission and the California State Legislature.

Çelebi

(2006) Recorded earthquake responses from the integrated seismic monitoring network of the Atwood Building, Anchorage, (AK). Earthquake Spectra 22(4): 847–864.

Çelebi

(2018) Quantifying the effect of beating inferred from recorded responses of tall buildings. In: Proceedings of the 11th National Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA. June 25–29, 2018.

10.

Çelebi

Sembera

(1985) Preliminary evaluation of performance of structures. In: Preliminary Report of Investigations of the Central Chile Earthquake of March 3 (ed. Algermissen

). U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 85-542. Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNABF571.pdf (accessed February 12, 2020). pp. 125–180.

11.

Çelebi

Hisada

Omrani

, et al. (2016a) Responses of two tall buildings in Tokyo, Japan, before, during, and after the M9.0 Tohoku Earthquake of March 11, 2011. Earthquake Spectra 32(1): 463–495.

12.

Çelebi

Hooper

Ron Klemencic

(2017a) Study of responses of 64-story Rincon Building to Napa, Fremont, Piedmont, San Ramon Earthquakes and Ambient Motions. Earthquake Spectra 33(3): 1125–1148.

13.

Çelebi

Kashima

Ghahari

, et al. (2017b) Before and after retrofit dynamic characteristics of a 55-story building. In: PROC.EVACES2017: Experimental vibration analysis for civil engineering structures, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 12–14 July.

14.

Çelebi

Kashima

Ghahari

, et al. (2018) Dynamic characteristics of a 55-story building before and after Retrofit. In: Conte

Astroza

Benzoni

, et al. (eds) Experimental Vibration Analysis for Civil Structures, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol. 5. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG, 2018, pp. 656–666.

15.

Çelebi

Okawa

Kashima

, et al. (2014) Response of a tall building far from the epicenter of the March 11, 2011 M=9.0 Great East Japan earthquake and its aftershocks. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 23: 427–441.

16.

Çelebi

Ulusoy

Nakata

(2016b) Responses of a tall building in Los Angeles, California as inferred from local and distant earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra 32(3): 1821–1843.

17.

Haskell

(1953) The dispersion of surface waves on multi-layered media. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 43(1): 17–34.

18.

Haskell

(1960) Crustal reflection of plane SH waves. Journal of Geophysical Research 65(12): 4147–4150.

19.

Instituto del Cemento y del Hormigon de Chile (ICH) (2002) Edificio Chilenos de Hormigon Armado. Providencia, Chile: ICH.

20.

Jennings

Bielak

(1973) Dynamics of building-soil interaction. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 63(1): 9–48.

21.

Lagos

Kupfer

Lindenberg

, et al. (2012) Seismic performance of high-rise concrete buildings in Chile. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings 1(3): 181–194.

22.

Lee

E-J

Chen

Jordan

, et al. (2014) Full-3-D tomography for crustal structure in southern California based on the scattering-integral and the adjoint-wavefield methods. Journal of Geophysical Research 119(8): 6421–6451.

23.

Los Angeles Tall Buildings Structural Design Council (LATBSDC) (2011) An Alternative Procedure for Seismic Analyses and Design of Tall Buildings Located in the Los Angeles Region: A Consensus Document. 2017 later ed. Los Angeles, CA: LATBSDC, 72 pp.

24.

Luco

(1980) Soil-structure interaction and identification of structural models. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ASCE conference on civil engineering and nuclear power, vol. 2, Knoxville, TN, 15–17 September.

25.

Pandit

(1991) Modal and Spectrum Analysis. New York: John Wiley.

26.

Safak

Kaya

Skolnik

, et al. (2014) Recorded response of a tall building in Abu Dhabi from a distant large earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 10th U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, May. DOI: 10.4231/D3C53F215.

27.

Shaw

Plesch

Tapea

, et al. (2015) Unified structural representation of the southern California crust and upper mantle. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 415: 1–15.

28.

Skolnik

Ciudad

Franke

, et al. (2013) Operation of the structural health monitoring network of unique structures in Abu Dhabi Emirate. In: 8th Gulf seismic forum, Oman, Muscat, 3–6 March.

29.

Stewart

Fenves

(1998.) System identification for evaluating soil–structure interaction effects in buildings from strong motion recordings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 27(8): 869–885.

30.

Taborda

Azizzadeh-Roodpish

Khoshnevis

, et al. (2016) Evaluation of the southern California seismic velocity models through simulation of recorded events. Geophysical Journal International 205: 1342–1364.

31.

Van Overschee

De Moor

(1994) N4SID: Subspace algorithms for the identification of combined deterministic-stochastic systems. Automatica 30(1): 75–93.

32.

Van Overschee

De Moor

(1996) Subspace Identification for Linear Systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.