In this study, a new horizontal ground-motion model is developed for crustal and subduction earthquakes in Taiwan. A novel two-step maximum-likelihood method is used as a regression tool to develop this model. This method simultaneously considers both the correlation between records and the biased sampling because of random truncation. Moreover, additional ground-motion data can be considered to derive more reliable analysis results. The functional form of the proposed ground-motion model is constructed using the response spectrum of the reference ground-motion scenario and different scalings of the source, path, and site to illustrate the ground-motion characteristics. The variabilities in the ground-motion intensity that result from different events, stations, and records are developed individually to derive a single-station sigma. The proposed ground-motion model may be useful for predicting ground-motion intensity and performing site-specific probabilistic seismic hazard analysis in Taiwan.
AbrahamsonNAGregorNAddoK (2016) BC hydro ground motion prediction equations for subduction earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra32(1): 23–44.
2.
AbrahamsonNASilvaWJKamaiR (2014) Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthquake Spectra30(3): 1025–1055.
3.
AkkarSSandıkkayaMABommerJJ (2014) Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering12(1): 359–387.
4.
Al AtikLAbrahamsonNABommerJJ, et al. (2010) The variability of ground-motion prediction models and its components. Seismological Research Letters81: 794–801.
5.
BindiDMassaMLuziL, et al. (2014) Pan-European ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods up to 3.0 s using the RESORCE dataset. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering12(1): 391–430.
6.
BooreDM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. In: AkiK (ed.) Seismic Motion, Lithospheric Structures, Earthquake and Volcanic Sources: The Keiiti Aki Volume. Basel: Birkhäuser, pp. 635–676.
7.
BooreDM (2010) Orientation-independent, non geometric-mean measures of seismic intensity from two horizontal components of motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America100: 1830–1835.
8.
BooreDMStewartJPSeyhanE, et al. (2014) NGA-West2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra30(3): 1057–1085.
9.
BooreDMWatson-LampreyJAbrahamsonNA (2006) Orientation-independent measures of ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America96: 1502–1511.
10.
BragatoPL (2004) Regression analysis with truncated samples and its application to ground-motion attenuation studies. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America94: 1369–1378.
11.
CampbellKWBozorgniaY (2014) NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra. Earthquake Spectra30(3): 1087–1115.
12.
ChangTYCottonFAngelierJ (2001) Seismic attenuation and peak ground acceleration in Taiwan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America91(5): 1229–1246.
13.
ChangYWJeanWYLohCH (2012) A comparison of NGA ground-motion prediction models with Taiwan models and data. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon, 24 September.
14.
ChaoSHChenYH (2019) A novel regression analysis method for randomly truncated strong-motion data. Earthquake Spectra35(2): 977–1001.
15.
ChenYHTsaiCCP (2002) A new method for estimation of the attenuation relationship with variance components. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America92: 1984–1991.
16.
ChiouBSJYoungsRR (2008) An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthquake Spectra24(1): 173–215.
17.
ChiouBSJYoungsRR (2014) Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthquake Spectra30(3): 1117–1153.
18.
ChiouBSJYoungsRRAbrahamsonN, et al. (2010) Ground-motion attenuation model for small-to-moderate shallow crustal earthquakes in California and its implications on regionalization of ground-motion prediction models. Earthquake Spectra26(4): 907–926.
19.
ChungJK (2006) Prediction of peak ground acceleration in southwestern Taiwan as revealed by analysis of CHY array data. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences17(1): 139–167.
20.
FukushimaY (1996) Scaling relations for strong ground motion prediction models with M2 terms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America86: 329–336.
21.
HuttonLKBooreDM (1987) The ML scale in Southern California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America77: 2074–2094.
22.
IdrissIM (2014) An NGA-West2 empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values generated by shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra30(3): 1155–1177.
23.
JeanWYChangYWWenKL, et al. (2006) Early estimation of seismic hazard for strong earthquakes in Taiwan. Natural Hazards37: 39–53.
24.
JoynerWBBooreDM (1981) Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America71: 2011–2038.
25.
JoynerWBBooreDM (1993) Methods for regression analysis of strong-motion data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America83(2): 469–487.
26.
KamaiRAbrahamsonNASilvaWJ (2014) Nonlinear horizontal site amplification for constraining the NGA-West2 GMPEs. Earthquake Spectra30(3): 1223–1240.
27.
KaoCYChungJKYehYT (2010) A comparative study of the least squares method and the genetic algorithm in deducing peak ground acceleration attenuation. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences21(6): 869–878.
28.
KuoCHLinCMChangSC, et al. (2017) Site database for Taiwan strong motion stations. NCREE Report No. NCREE-17-004. Taipei, Taiwan: National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering.
29.
KwokOLAStewartJPKwakDY, et al. (2018) Taiwan-specific model for VS30 prediction considering between-proxy correlations. Earthquake Spectra34(4): 1973–1993.
30.
LinCMKuoCHHuangJY, et al. (2018) Shallow shear-wave velocity structures of TSMIP stations in Taiwan. NCREE Report No. NCREE-18-019. Taipei, Taiwan: National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering.
31.
LinPSLeeCT (2008) Ground-motion attenuation relationships for subduction-zone earthquakes in northeastern Taiwan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America98(1): 220–240.
32.
LinPSChiouBAbrahamsonN, et al. (2011a) Repeatable source, site, and path effects on the standard deviation for empirical ground-motion prediction models. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America101(5): 2281–2295.
33.
LinPSLeeCTChengCT, et al. (2011b) Response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes in Taiwan. Engineering Geology121: 150–164.
34.
LiuKSTsaiYB (2005) Attenuation relationships of peak ground acceleration and velocity for crustal earthquakes in Taiwan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America95(3): 1045–1058.
35.
LiuKSTsaiYB (2015) A refined Vs30 map for Taiwan based on ground motion attenuation relationships. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences26: 631–653.
36.
LiuKSTsaiYBLinPS (2013) A study on fault-type and site-effect (VS30) parameters in the attenuation relationships of peak ground acceleration and peak ground velocity in Ilan, Taiwan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America103(3): 1823–1845.
37.
LiuKSTsaiYBChangCH, et al. (2014) A study of site effects in Ilan, Taiwan, based on attenuation relationships of spectral acceleration. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America104(5): 2467–2490.
38.
LohCHYehYTJeanWY, et al. (1991) Probabilistic seismic risk analysis in the Taiwan area based on PGA and spectral amplitude attenuation formulas. Engineering Geology30(3–4): 277–304.
39.
McLaughlinKL (1991) Maximum likelihood estimation of strong-motion attenuation relationships. Earthquake Spectra7: 267–279.
40.
National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE) (2015) Reevaluation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard of Nuclear Facilities in Taiwan Using SSHAC Level 3 Methodology Project. Available at: http://sshac.ncree.org.tw (accessed 31 December 2019).
41.
National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE) (2018) Engineering Geological Database for TSMIP (EGDT). Available at: http://egdt.ncree.org.tw/Index.htm (accessed 27 June 2018).
42.
NiaziMBozorgniaY (1991) Behaviour of near-source peak horizontal and vertical ground motions over SMART-1 array, Taiwan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America81(3): 715–732.
43.
NiaziMBozorgniaY (1992) Behaviour of near-source vertical and horizontal response spectra at SMART-1 array, Taiwan. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics21: 37–50.
44.
Rodriguez-MarekACottonFAbrahamsonNA, et al. (2013) A model for single-station standard deviation using data from various tectonic regions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America103(6): 3149–3163.
45.
SokolovVWenzelFJeanWY, et al. (2010) Uncertainty and spatial correlation of earthquake ground motion in Taiwan. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Science21(6): 905–921.
46.
TavakoliBPezeshkS (2007) A new approach to estimate a mixed model–based ground motion prediction equation. Earthquake Spectra23(3): 665–684.
47.
TsaiCCPYHChenCHLiu (2006) The path effect in ground-motion variability: An application of the variance-components technique. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America96(3): 1170–1176.
48.
WangGQBooreDMIgelH, et al. (2004) Comparisons of ground motions from five aftershocks of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake with empirical predictions largely based on data from California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America94(6): 2198–2212.
49.
WangYJLeeYTMaKF, et al. (2016) New attenuation relationship for peak ground and pseudo-spectral acceleration of normal-faulting earthquakes in offshore Northeast Taiwan. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences27(1): 043.
50.
WuYMChangCHZhaoL, et al. (2008a) A comprehensive relocation of earthquakes in Taiwan from 1991 to 2005. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America98: 1471–1481.
51.
WuYMHsuYJChangCH, et al. (2010) Temporal and spatial variation of stress field in Taiwan from 1991 to 2007: Insights from comprehensive first motion focal mechanism catalog. Earth and Planetary Science Letters298: 306–316.
52.
WuYMShinTCChangCH (2001) Near real-time mapping of peak ground acceleration and peak ground velocity following a strong earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America91(5): 1218–1228.
53.
WuYMZhaoLChangCH, et al. (2008b) Focal-mechanism determination in Taiwan by genetic algorithm. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America98: 651–661.
54.
YenierEAtkinsonGM (2014) Equivalent point-source modeling of moderate-to-large magnitude earthquakes and associated ground-motion saturation effects. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America104(3): 1458–1478.
55.
ZhaoJXJiangFShiP, et al. (2016a) Ground-motion prediction equations for subduction slab earthquakes in Japan using site class and simple geometric attenuation functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America106(4): 1535–1551.
56.
ZhaoJXLiangXJiangF, et al. (2016b) Ground-motion prediction equations for subduction interface earthquakes in Japan using site class and simple geometric attenuation functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America106(4): 1518–1534.
57.
ZhaoJXZhouSZhouJ, et al. (2016c) Ground-motion prediction equations for shallow crustal and upper-mantle earthquakes in Japan using site class and simple geometric attenuation functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America106(4): 1552–1569.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
