Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1988-3
A Descriptive Analysis of Relationships Between Verbal Behaviors of Teacher-Conductors and Ratings of Selected Junior and Senior High School Band Rehearsals
Amidon, E., & Hough, J. B. (Eds.). (1967). Interaction analysis: Theory, research, and application. Reading, MA: Addision Publishing.
2.
Anderson, H. H. (1939). The measurement of domination and of socially integrative behavior in teachers’ contacts with children. Child Development, 10, 73–57.
3.
Erbes, R. (1972). The development of an observational system for the analysis of interaction in the rehearsal of musical organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.
4.
Flanders, N. A. (1963). Teacher influence in the classroom. In A. A. Bellack (ed.), Theory and research in teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
Flanders, N. A. (1967). Intent, action, and feedback: A preparation for teaching. In E. J. Amidon & J. B. Hough (eds.), Interaction analysis: Theory, research, and application. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
6.
Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing teacher behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
7.
Madsen, C. K. & Madsen, C. H. (1981). Teaching/discipline: A positive approach for educational development. Raleigh, NC: Contemporary Publishing.
8.
Murray, C. K. (1975). The effect of teacher approval/disapproval on musical performance, attentiveness, and attitude of high school choruses. In C. K. Madsen, R. D. Greer, & C. H. Madsen, Jr. (eds.), Research in music behavior (pp. 165–180). New York: Teachers College Press.
9.
Pontious, M. (1982). A profile of rehearsal techniques and interaction of selected band conductors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.
10.
Price, H. E. (1983). The effect of conductor academic task presentation, conductor reinforcement, and ensemble practice on performers’ musical achievement, attentiveness, and attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 245–257.
11.
Reynolds, K. (1974). Modification of the observational system for instructional analysis focusing on appraisal behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
12.
Rosenshine, B. (1970). Some criteria for evaluating category systems (AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation. No. 6). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
13.
Rosenshine, B., & Furst, N. (1973). The use of direct observation to study teaching. In R. M. W. Travers (ed.), The second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
14.
Simon, A., & Boyer, E. G. (eds.). (1970). Mirrors for behavior: An anthology of observation instruments (Vols. 1–14 and summary). Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.
15.
Snapp, D. (1967). A study of the accumulative musical and verbal behaviors of teachers and students in fifth grade instrumental music classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
16.
Spradling, R. L. (1985). The effect of timeout from performance on attentiveness and attitude of university band students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 123–137.
17.
Thurman, V. L. (1976). A frequency and time description of selected rehearsal behaviors used by five conductors. Paper presented at the Music Educators National Conference National Convention, Atlantic City, NJ.
18.
Whithall, J. (1949). The development of a technique for the measurement of social-emotional climate in the classroom. Journal of Experimental Education, 17, 347–361.
19.
Yarbrough, C. (1975). Effects of magnitude of conductor behavior on students in selected mixed choruses. Journal of Research in Music Education, 17, 134–146.
20.
Yarbrough, C., & Price, H. (1981). Prediction of performer attentiveness by rehearsal activity and conductor behavior. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 209–217.