This short-form manuscript in an ongoing line of research reports the effects of three listening approaches on rhythmic dictation scores. Forty-three undergraduate music majors completed dictations under each of three conditions, after hearing orienting tempo clicks: (a) immediate listening, (b) pulse tapping, and (c) silent, equivalent interval. A one-way repeated measures analysis of variance revealed no significant difference in test scores, F(2, 84) = .341, p = .712, partial η² = .008, based on condition. Results suggest that physically tapping a pulse prior to dictation neither helped nor hindered students’ success rates. Some students may find it beneficial, so aural skills teachers might consider introducing it as a strategy. However, once tried and practiced, students should be given the option to decline tapping. Teachers can help students discover their own best strategies for focused attention, short-term memory, understanding, and notation during dictation by guiding them through hands-on exploration of multiple options.
AbrilC.FlowersP. (2007). Attention, preference, and identity in music listening by middle school students of different linguistic backgrounds. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55(3), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242940705500303
2.
AcevedoS.TemperleyD.PfordresherP. Q. (2014). Effects of metrical encoding on melody recognition. Music Perception, 31(4), 372–386. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2014.31.4.372
3.
BeckettC. A. (1997). Directing student attention during two–part dictation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(4), 613–625. https://doi:10.2307/3345426
4.
BuonviriN. O. (2014). An exploration of undergraduate music majors’ melodic dictation strategies. Update: Applications of Research in Muwsic Education, 33(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123314521036
5.
BuonviriN. O. (2018). Effects of silence, sound, and singing on melodic dictation accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 66, 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429418801333
6.
BuonviriN. O. (2021). Effects of two approaches to rhythmic dictation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 68, 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429420946308
7.
ChenJ. L.PenhuneV. B.ZatorreR. J. (2008). Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions of the brain. Cerebral Cortex, 18(12), 2844–2854. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn042
8.
ChenetteT. (2021). Attentional control: A perceptual fundamental. In ClelandC. D.FleetP. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to aural skills pedagogy: Before, in, and beyond higher education (pp. 47–57). Routledge.
9.
DiazF. M. (2015). Listening and musical engagement: An exploration of the effects of different listening strategies on attention, emotion, and peak affective experiences. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 33(2), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123314540665
10.
DukeR. A. (1994). When tempo changes rhythm: The effect of tempo on nonmusicians’ perception of rhythm. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345334
11.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
GrahnJ. A.BrettM. (2007). Rhythm and beat perception in motor areas of the brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 893–906. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.893
14.
HenryM. J.GrahnJ. A. (2017). Music, brain, and movement: Time, beat, and rhythm. In AshleyR.TimmersR. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to music cognition (pp. 63–73). Routledge.
15.
HewittM. P. (2001). The effects of self-evaluation, self–listening, and modeling on junior high instrumentalists’ music performance and practice attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(4), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345614
16.
JonesM. R.PfordresherP. Q. (1997). Tracking musical patterns using joint accent structure. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 51(4), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/1196–1961.51.4.271
17.
KarpinskiG. S. (2000). Aural skills acquisition. Oxford University Press.
18.
KarpinskiG. S. (2021). The seeing ear: Toward a rationale for dictation. In ClelandC. D.FleetP. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to aural skills pedagogy (pp. 37–46). Routledge.
19.
KinneyD. W.ForsytheJ. L. (2012). Does melody assist in the reproduction of novel rhythm patterns?Contributions to Music Education, 39, 69–85. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24127245
LondonJ. (2012). Hearing in time: Psychological aspects of musical meter. Oxford University Press.
22.
MadsenC. K.GeringerJ. M. (2000–2001). A focus of attention model for meaningful listening. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 147, 103–108. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319396
23.
MadsenC. K.GeringerJ. M. (2008). Reflections on Puccini’s La Boheme: Investigating a model for listening. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429408323072
24.
ManningF.SchutzM. (2013). “Moving to the beat” improves timing perception. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20, 1133–1139. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423–013–0439–7
25.
MclaughlinP.BoalsA. (2010). Perceptual organization can affect performance on rhythmic tasks. Psychology of Music, 38(4), 395–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735609351916
26.
NicholsB. E.StambaughL. A. (2022). Melody, not beat perception, predicts rhythmic error detection. Journal of Research in Music Education, 70(2), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224294211032160
27.
PaananenP. A. (2007). Melodic improvisation at the age of 6–11 years: Development of pitch and rhythm. Musicae Scientiae, 11(1), 89–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/102986490701100104
28.
PaneyA. S.BuonviriN. O. (2017). Developing melodic dictation pedagogy: A survey of college theory instructors. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 36(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123316686815
29.
PatelA. D.IversenJ. R. (2014). The evolutionary neuroscience of musical beat perception: The Action Simulation for Auditory Prediction (ASAP) hypothesis. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8(57), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00057
30.
PatelA. D.IversenJ. R.ChenY.ReppB. H. (2005). The influence of metricality and modality on synchronization with a beat. Experimental Brain Research, 163, 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221–004–2159–8
31.
PembrookR. G. (1986). Interference of the transcription process and other selected variables on perception and memory during melodic dictation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34(4), 238–261. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345259
32.
PembrookR. G. (1987). The effect of vocalization on melodic memory conservation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35(3), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344958
SuY. H.PöppelE. (2012). Body movement enhances the extraction of temporal structures in auditory sequences. Psychological Research, 76, 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426–011–0346–3
35.
WaggonerD. T. (2011). Effects of listening conditions, error types, and ensemble textures on error detection skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59(1), 56–71. https://doi:10.1177/0022429410396094
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
