The purpose of this literature review was to synthesize relevant research concerning the blended learning and flipped lesson models, and their potential role in performance-based music classrooms. I provide theoretical backgrounds of these models and introduce Puentedura’s Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition model as a possible framework for implementation. Overall effectiveness and challenges of the blended learning and flipped lesson models are discussed. Finally, research and experience-based suggestions for practice are provided to help music educators implement these learning models in their classrooms.
AbrilC. R.GaultB. M. (2008). The state of music in secondary schools: The principal’s perspective. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429408317516
2.
AkbelB. A. (2018). Students’ and instructors’ opinions on the implementation of flipped learning model for cello education in Turkish music. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(8), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i8.3256
ArmstrongA. (2014). Technology in the classroom: It’s not a matter of “if,” but “when” and “how.”Education Digest, 79(5), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432110391810
5.
Arnold-GarzaS. (2014). The flipped classroom teaching model and its use for information literacy instruction. Communications in Information Literacy, 8(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2014.8.1.161
6.
BazelaisP.DoleckT. (2018). Blended learning and traditional learning: A comparative study of college mechanics courses. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 2889–2900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9748-9
7.
BergmannJ.SamsA. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
8.
BirchH. J.WoodruffE. (2017). Technical exercise practice: Can piano students be motivated through gamification?Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 10(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.10.1.31_1
9.
BrownlowJ. A. (2017). A new approach to music history pedagogy using iPad technology and flipped learning. College Music Symposium, 57. https://jstor.org/stable/26574460
CollinsA.HalversonR. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press.
13.
DoiC. (2016). Applying the flipped classroom methodology in a first-year undergraduate research methods course. Music Reference Services Quarterly, 19(2), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10588167.2016.1167427
DziubanC.GrahamC. R.MoskalP. D.NorbergA.SiciliaN. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
16.
FernándezM. G.GuglielmoneM. V. G.MariñoS. I.BarriosW. G. (2018). Inverting the class or investing in the class? Flipped classroom in teaching technology for multimedia production. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 790, 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75214-3_28
HamiltonE. R.RosenbergJ. M.AkcaogluM. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. Tech Trends, 60(5), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0091-y
KeengweJ.SchnellertG.MillsC. (2011). Laptop initiative: Impact on instructional technology integration and student learning. Education and Informational Technologies, 17(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-010-9150-8
21.
KewalRamaniA.ZhangJ.WangX.RathbunA.CorcoranL.DilibertiM.ZhangJ. (2018). Student access to digital learning resources outside of the classroom (NCES 2017-098). National Center for Education Statistics. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED581891.pdf
22.
KintuM. J.ZhuC.KagambeE. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: The relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10-1186/s41239-017-0043-4
23.
KruseN. B.HarlosS. C.CallahanR. M.HerringM. L. (2013). Skype music lessons in the academy: Intersections of music education, applied music and technology. Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 6(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.6.1.43_1
24.
LandyL. (2011). Discovered whist entering a new millennium: A technological revolution that will radically influence both music making and music education. Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 4(2&3), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.4.2-3.181_1
25.
LoC. K.HewK. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K–12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2
26.
MassoumiD.LindströmB. (2011). Quality in e-learning: A framework for promoting and assuring quality in virtual institutions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00440.x
27.
MatthewsW. K. (2015). Flipped learning in the collegiate music classroom: Rethinking the undergraduate brass techniques and pedagogy class. ITG Journal, 40(1), 58–63. https://researchgate.net/publication/282646504
28.
McLaughlinJ. E.WhiteP. J.KhanovaJ.YurievE. (2016). Flipped classroom implementation: A case report of two higher education institutions in the United States and Australia. Computers in the Schools, 33(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2016.1137734
29.
MeshL. J. (2016). A curriculum-based approach to blended learning. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12(3), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1168
30.
MilheimW. D. (2006). Strategies for the design and delivery of blended learning courses. Educational Technology, 46(6), 44–47. https://jstor.org/stable/44429352
31.
NaritaF. M. (2018). Informal learning practices in distance music teacher education: Technology (de)humanizing interactions. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 17(3), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.22176/act17.3.57
32.
NetolickaJ.SimonovaI. (2017, June27-29). SAMR model and Bloom’s digital taxonomy applied in blended learning/teaching of general English and ESP. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Symposium on Education Technology, ISET 2017 (pp. 277–281). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET.2017.68
33.
NortvigA. M.PetersenA. K.BalleS. H. (2018). A literature review of the factors influencing e-learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcome, student satisfaction and engagement. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 16(1), 46–55. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1175336.pdf
SlomansonW. R. (2014). Blended learning: A flipped classroom experiment. Journal of Legal Education, 64(1), 93–102. https://jstor.org/stable/24716075
37.
StoverS.HambrightG.CollinsD. (2014). Effect of web conferring on social presence in a face-to-face choral ensemble class. Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 7(2), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.7.2.217_1
TiahrtT.PorterJ. C. (2016). What do I do with this flipping classroom: Ideas for effectively using class time in a flipped course. Business Education Innovation Journal, 8(2), 85–91. http://beijournal.com/images/V8N2_final.pdf#page=85
40.
UzR.UzunA. (2018). The influence of blended learning environment on self-regulated and self-directed learning skills of learners. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 877–886. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.877
41.
WhitesideA. L.DikkersA. G. (2016). “More confident going into college”: Lessons learned from multiple stakeholders in a new blended learning initiative. Online Learning, 20(4), 136–156. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1124646.pdf
